StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Platform as a Service
  4. Platform As A Service
  5. CapRover vs Red Hat OpenShift

CapRover vs Red Hat OpenShift

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Stacks1.6K
Followers1.4K
Votes517
GitHub Stars885
Forks510
CapRover
CapRover
Stacks56
Followers94
Votes54
GitHub Stars14.6K
Forks941

CapRover vs Red Hat OpenShift: What are the differences?

  1. Deployment and Scalability: CapRover offers a simple and straightforward deployment process that is ideal for small to medium-sized projects. On the other hand, Red Hat OpenShift provides more robust deployment and scaling capabilities, making it suitable for enterprise-level applications with complex requirements.

  2. Ease of Use: CapRover is known for its user-friendly interface and ease of use, making it preferred by developers who value simplicity and efficiency in their workflow. Red Hat OpenShift, while powerful, has a steeper learning curve due to its extensive feature set and enterprise-grade capabilities.

  3. Community Support: CapRover has a growing community of users and contributors, offering a more agile and responsive support system for developers. Red Hat OpenShift, being an enterprise solution from a well-established company, provides comprehensive support options, including professional services and a dedicated support team.

  4. Cost Structure: CapRover is open-source software, making it free to use and customize according to your needs without any licensing fees. Red Hat OpenShift, on the other hand, offers both a free version (OpenShift Origin) and commercial versions (OpenShift Container Platform), which come with licensing costs and additional features tailored for enterprise use.

  5. Security Features: Red Hat OpenShift is renowned for its robust security measures, including built-in compliance controls, role-based access control, and security scanning tools. CapRover, while providing fundamental security features, may require additional configuration and third-party tools for advanced security needs in a production environment.

  6. Integration Ecosystem: Red Hat OpenShift has a larger ecosystem of integrated technologies and tools, making it easier to work with other popular platforms and services in the cloud-native space. CapRover, while capable of integration through APIs and extensions, does not have the same level of pre-built integrations and partnerships as Red Hat OpenShift.

In Summary, CapRover is a user-friendly and cost-effective platform suitable for small to medium projects, while Red Hat OpenShift offers enterprise-grade features, scalability, and security, making it a preferred choice for large-scale applications with complex requirements.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
CapRover
CapRover

OpenShift is Red Hat's Cloud Computing Platform as a Service (PaaS) offering. OpenShift is an application platform in the cloud where application developers and teams can build, test, deploy, and run their applications.

It is an extremely easy to use app/database deployment & web server manager for your NodeJS, Python, PHP, ASP.NET, Ruby, MySQL, MongoDB, Postgres, WordPress (and etc...) applications! It's blazingly fast and very robust as it uses Docker, nginx, LetsEncrypt and NetData under the hood behind its simple-to-use interface.

Built-in support for Node.js, Ruby, Python, PHP, Perl, and Java (the standard in today's Enterprise);OpenShift is extensible with a customizable cartridge functionality that allows developers to add any other language they wish. We've seen everything from Clojure to Cobol running on OpenShift;OpenShift supports frameworks ranging from Spring, to Rails, to Play;Autoscaling- OpenShift can scale your application by adding additional instances of your application and enabling clustering. Alternatively, you can manually scale the amount of resources with which your application is deployed when needed;OpenShift by Red Hat is built on open-source technologies (Red Hat Enterprise Linux- RHEL);One Click Deployment- Deploying to the OpenShift platform is as easy a clicking a button or entering a "Git push" command
CLI for automation and scripting; Web GUI for ease of access and convenience; No lock-in! Remove CapRover and your apps keep working!; Docker Swarm under the hood for containerization and clustering; Nginx (fully customizable template) under the hood for load-balancing; Let's Encrypt under the hood for free SSL (HTTPS)
Statistics
GitHub Stars
885
GitHub Stars
14.6K
GitHub Forks
510
GitHub Forks
941
Stacks
1.6K
Stacks
56
Followers
1.4K
Followers
94
Votes
517
Votes
54
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 99
    Good free plan
  • 63
    Open Source
  • 47
    Easy setup
  • 43
    Nodejs support
  • 42
    Well documented
Cons
  • 2
    Decisions are made for you, limiting your options
  • 2
    License cost
  • 1
    Behind, sometimes severely, the upstreams
Pros
  • 12
    Mangage complex infrastructure easily
  • 12
    Opensource
  • 8
    Auto SSL
  • 6
    Docker
  • 6
    Easy instalation
Integrations
No integrations available
MongoDB
MongoDB
Docker
Docker
Node.js
Node.js
PostgreSQL
PostgreSQL
MySQL
MySQL
NGINX
NGINX
Ruby
Ruby
PHP
PHP
ASP.NET
ASP.NET
WordPress
WordPress

What are some alternatives to Red Hat OpenShift, CapRover?

Heroku

Heroku

Heroku is a cloud application platform – a new way of building and deploying web apps. Heroku lets app developers spend 100% of their time on their application code, not managing servers, deployment, ongoing operations, or scaling.

Clever Cloud

Clever Cloud

Clever Cloud is a polyglot cloud application platform. The service helps developers to build applications with many languages and services, with auto-scaling features and a true pay-as-you-go pricing model.

Google App Engine

Google App Engine

Google has a reputation for highly reliable, high performance infrastructure. With App Engine you can take advantage of the 10 years of knowledge Google has in running massively scalable, performance driven systems. App Engine applications are easy to build, easy to maintain, and easy to scale as your traffic and data storage needs grow.

AWS Elastic Beanstalk

AWS Elastic Beanstalk

Once you upload your application, Elastic Beanstalk automatically handles the deployment details of capacity provisioning, load balancing, auto-scaling, and application health monitoring.

Render

Render

Render is a unified platform to build and run all your apps and websites with free SSL, a global CDN, private networks and auto deploys from Git.

Hasura

Hasura

An open source GraphQL engine that deploys instant, realtime GraphQL APIs on any Postgres database.

Cloud 66

Cloud 66

Cloud 66 gives you everything you need to build, deploy and maintain your applications on any cloud, without the headache of dealing with "server stuff". Frameworks: Ruby on Rails, Node.js, Jamstack, Laravel, GoLang, and more.

Jelastic

Jelastic

Jelastic is a Multi-Cloud DevOps PaaS for ISVs, telcos, service providers and enterprises needing to speed up development, reduce cost of IT infrastructure, improve uptime and security.

Dokku

Dokku

It is an extensible, open source Platform as a Service that runs on a single server of your choice. It helps you build and manage the lifecycle of applications from building to scaling.

PythonAnywhere

PythonAnywhere

It's somewhat unique. A small PaaS that supports web apps (Python only) as well as scheduled jobs with shell access. It is an expensive way to tinker and run several small apps.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase