Checkstyle vs TSLint

Overview

Checkstyle

Stacks132

Followers107

Votes0

GitHub Stars8.7K

Forks3.9K

TSLint

Stacks3.4K

Followers234

Votes0

Checkstyle vs TSLint: What are the differences?

Introduction:

Markdown code is a lightweight markup language used for formatting text on websites. It allows users to easily create headers, lists, links, and other formatting elements. In this task, we will format the provided text as Markdown code that can be used in a website.

Key Differences between Checkstyle and TSLint:

Architecture: Checkstyle is written in Java and operates on Java source code, while TSLint is written in TypeScript and operates on TypeScript source code. This difference in architecture makes Checkstyle more suitable for Java projects and TSLint for TypeScript projects.
Supported Languages: Checkstyle primarily focuses on Java and supports only a limited number of other languages, such as XML and properties files. On the other hand, TSLint focuses solely on TypeScript and does not support any other languages. This difference in language support makes Checkstyle a more versatile tool for projects involving multiple languages.
Rule Definitions: Checkstyle and TSLint have different rule sets and rule definitions. Checkstyle's rule definitions are based on XML files, allowing for more flexibility and customization. TSLint, on the other hand, uses JSON-based configuration files for rule definitions, which have a simpler structure but may not offer the same level of configurability as Checkstyle.
Integration: Checkstyle can be easily integrated with various build tools such as Ant, Maven, and Gradle, making it convenient for Java projects. TSLint, on the other hand, is primarily configured through its command-line interface or IDE plugins, making it more suitable for TypeScript projects that may not rely heavily on build tools.
Rule Coverage: Checkstyle has a comprehensive set of rules that cover various aspects of Java coding conventions, code style, and potential bugs. TSLint, being a specialized linter for TypeScript, also has an extensive set of rules that cover TypeScript-specific coding conventions and best practices. The difference lies in the coverage of language-specific rules, with Checkstyle being more extensive for Java and TSLint for TypeScript.
Community Support: Checkstyle has been around for a longer time and has a larger community of users and contributors. This means that there are more resources, plugins, and support available for Checkstyle. TSLint, being a relatively newer tool, has a smaller community but is backed by the popularity and support of the TypeScript ecosystem.

In summary, Checkstyle and TSLint differ in terms of architecture, language support, rule definitions, integration options, rule coverage, and community support, making each tool more suitable for specific use cases in Java or TypeScript projects.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Checkstyle , TSLint

Budi

Programmer

Aug 19, 2020

Review

I think you scan skip MongoDB for now and focussing on creating web component with Reactjs or Vue, I would also recommend to use TypeScript for type hinting support.

For styling, learn CSS first then upgrade to SASS/SCSS or LESS (pick one as mostly same concept) to make CSS more maintainable.

Also to improve your skill on both sectors, install linters if available. For TypeScipt, there are TSLint and for styling, i think there are Stylint. Linter will help you adapt to make a clean code and understand how other peoples usually styled their code.

41.6k views41.6k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Checkstyle	TSLint
It is a development tool to help programmers write Java code that adheres to a coding standard. It automates the process of checking Java code to spare humans of this boring (but important) task. This makes it ideal for projects that want to enforce a coding standard.	An extensible static analysis tool that checks TypeScript code for readability, maintainability, and functionality errors. It is widely supported across modern editors & build systems and can be customized with your own lint rules, configurations, and formatters.
-	Extensive set of core rules; Custom lint rules; Custom formatters (failure reporters); Configuration presets; Composition; Automatic fixing of formatting & style violations
Statistics
GitHub Stars 8.7K	GitHub Stars -
GitHub Forks 3.9K	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 132	Stacks 3.4K
Followers 107	Followers 234
Votes 0	Votes 0
Integrations
IntelliJ IDEA Java	Vim Visual Studio Code TypeScript Atom WebStorm Emacs gulp Sublime Text Visual Studio Grunt

What are some alternatives to Checkstyle , TSLint?

Code Climate

After each Git push, Code Climate analyzes your code for complexity, duplication, and common smells to determine changes in quality and surface technical debt hotspots.

Codacy

Codacy automates code reviews and monitors code quality on every commit and pull request on more than 40 programming languages reporting back the impact of every commit or PR, issues concerning code style, best practices and security.

Phabricator

Phabricator is a collection of open source web applications that help software companies build better software.

PullReview

PullReview helps Ruby and Rails developers to develop new features cleanly, on-time, and with confidence by automatically reviewing their code.

Gerrit Code Review

Gerrit is a self-hosted pre-commit code review tool. It serves as a Git hosting server with option to comment incoming changes. It is highly configurable and extensible with default guarding policies, webhooks, project access control and more.

SonarQube

SonarQube provides an overview of the overall health of your source code and even more importantly, it highlights issues found on new code. With a Quality Gate set on your project, you will simply fix the Leak and start mechanically improving.

RuboCop

RuboCop is a Ruby static code analyzer. Out of the box it will enforce many of the guidelines outlined in the community Ruby Style Guide.

CodeFactor.io

CodeFactor.io automatically and continuously tracks code quality with every GitHub or BitBucket commit and pull request, helping software developers save time in code reviews and efficiently tackle technical debt.

ESLint

A pluggable and configurable linter tool for identifying and reporting on patterns in JavaScript. Maintain your code quality with ease.

Amazon CodeGuru

It is a machine learning service for automated code reviews and application performance recommendations. It helps you find the most expensive lines of code that hurt application performance and keep you up all night troubleshooting, then gives you specific recommendations to fix or improve your code.

Related Comparisons

Checkstyle vs TSLint: What are the differences?

Introduction:

Key Differences between Checkstyle and TSLint:

Architecture: Checkstyle is written in Java and operates on Java source code, while TSLint is written in TypeScript and operates on TypeScript source code. This difference in architecture makes Checkstyle more suitable for Java projects and TSLint for TypeScript projects.
Supported Languages: Checkstyle primarily focuses on Java and supports only a limited number of other languages, such as XML and properties files. On the other hand, TSLint focuses solely on TypeScript and does not support any other languages. This difference in language support makes Checkstyle a more versatile tool for projects involving multiple languages.
Rule Definitions: Checkstyle and TSLint have different rule sets and rule definitions. Checkstyle's rule definitions are based on XML files, allowing for more flexibility and customization. TSLint, on the other hand, uses JSON-based configuration files for rule definitions, which have a simpler structure but may not offer the same level of configurability as Checkstyle.
Integration: Checkstyle can be easily integrated with various build tools such as Ant, Maven, and Gradle, making it convenient for Java projects. TSLint, on the other hand, is primarily configured through its command-line interface or IDE plugins, making it more suitable for TypeScript projects that may not rely heavily on build tools.
Rule Coverage: Checkstyle has a comprehensive set of rules that cover various aspects of Java coding conventions, code style, and potential bugs. TSLint, being a specialized linter for TypeScript, also has an extensive set of rules that cover TypeScript-specific coding conventions and best practices. The difference lies in the coverage of language-specific rules, with Checkstyle being more extensive for Java and TSLint for TypeScript.
Community Support: Checkstyle has been around for a longer time and has a larger community of users and contributors. This means that there are more resources, plugins, and support available for Checkstyle. TSLint, being a relatively newer tool, has a smaller community but is backed by the popularity and support of the TypeScript ecosystem.

Checkstyle vs TSLint

Overview