Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!


+ 1

+ 1
Add tool

Chocolatey vs Homebrew: What are the differences?

Chocolatey and Homebrew are two popular package managers used in different operating systems. Let's discuss the key differences between them:

  1. Installation Process: One major difference is the installation process. Chocolatey is supported on Windows operating systems, and it requires the installation of a package manager first. It provides a PowerShell command-line interface to install, upgrade, and uninstall software packages. On the other hand, Homebrew is designed for macOS and requires the installation of Xcode command-line tools, which include the Clang compiler. It leverages Terminal for managing packages.

  2. System Compatibility: Chocolatey is specifically built for Windows, providing a package management solution in a Windows environment. It can manage native Windows applications as well as Windows-specific libraries. On the contrary, Homebrew is designed exclusively for macOS, providing a package manager only for macOS and not for other operating systems.

  3. Package Repositories: Chocolatey has a centralized package repository called the Chocolatey Community Package Repository. It contains a wide range of packages that users can easily search, install, and manage. Homebrew, on the other hand, utilizes a decentralized model. It has its own package repository, called Homebrew Core, which is maintained by the Homebrew community. Users can contribute packages to Homebrew Core, and it also supports taps, which are additional repositories created by third-party developers.

  4. Package Management: Chocolatey and Homebrew have slightly different approaches to package management. Chocolatey uses NuGet packages, which are essentially ZIP archives with a specific folder structure. It automates package installations by scripting a series of commands. Homebrew, on the other hand, uses formulae, which are Ruby scripts that specify how to install and manage a particular package. It provides a more developer-focused approach by allowing users to modify the formulae to suit their needs.

  5. User Interface: Another difference lies in the user interface. Chocolatey provides a command-line interface (CLI) using PowerShell, which allows users to interact with the package manager through commands. It also offers a GUI package manager called Chocolatey GUI, which provides a graphical interface for managing packages. Homebrew, on the other hand, is primarily a command-line tool and relies on Terminal for all package management tasks. It does not have a graphical user interface.

  6. Supported Operating Systems: As mentioned earlier, Chocolatey is designed specifically for Windows and works on Windows 7 and higher, as well as Windows Server 2003 and higher. Homebrew, on the other hand, is exclusively for macOS and requires macOS 10.7 (Lion) or higher.

In summary, Chocolatey is a package manager for Windows, while Homebrew is for macOS. Chocolatey requires the installation of a package manager, supports a centralized repository, uses NuGet packages, and offers both command-line and GUI interfaces. On the other hand, Homebrew relies on Terminal, has a decentralized repository, uses formulae, and is exclusively for macOS.

Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More
Pros of Chocolatey
Pros of Homebrew
    Be the first to leave a pro
    • 3
      Clean, neat, powerful, fast and furious

    Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

    - No public GitHub repository available -

    What is Chocolatey?

    It is based on a developer-centric package manager called NuGet. Unlike manual installations, It adds, updates, and uninstalls programs in the background requiring very little user interaction.

    What is Homebrew?

    Homebrew installs the stuff you need that Apple didn’t. Homebrew installs packages to their own directory and then symlinks their files into /usr/local.

    Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

    What companies use Chocolatey?
    What companies use Homebrew?
    See which teams inside your own company are using Chocolatey or Homebrew.
    Sign up for StackShare EnterpriseLearn More

    Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

    What tools integrate with Chocolatey?
    What tools integrate with Homebrew?

    Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

    What are some alternatives to Chocolatey and Homebrew?
    A free and open-source package manager designed for the Microsoft development platform. It is also distributed as a Visual Studio extension.
    Bazel is a build tool that builds code quickly and reliably. It is used to build the majority of Google's software, and thus it has been designed to handle build problems present in Google's development environment.
    It installs programs to your home directory by default. So you don’t need admin permissions to install programs, and you won’t see UAC popups every time you need to add or remove a program.
    npm is the command-line interface to the npm ecosystem. It is battle-tested, surprisingly flexible, and used by hundreds of thousands of JavaScript developers every day.
    A free and open-source distribution of the Python and R programming languages for scientific computing, that aims to simplify package management and deployment. Package versions are managed by the package management system conda.
    See all alternatives