StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Build Automation
  4. Package Managers
  5. Chocolatey vs Scoop.sh

Chocolatey vs Scoop.sh

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Chocolatey
Chocolatey
Stacks96
Followers124
Votes0
Scoop.sh
Scoop.sh
Stacks24
Followers29
Votes0

Chocolatey vs Scoop.sh: What are the differences?

  1. Installation Process: Chocolatey is installed through PowerShell commands or through an executable installer, while Scoop.sh is installed through a PowerShell script or via command prompt with a curl command.
  2. Package Management: Chocolatey focuses on installing and managing packages globally on the system, while Scoop.sh emphasizes user-level installation and management, keeping packages isolated within the user's profile.
  3. Package Repository: Chocolatey has a centralized package repository hosted on its website, providing a vast collection of packages maintained by the community, whereas Scoop.sh uses a decentralized approach with individual users maintaining their own package repositories, giving users more control over packages.
  4. Package Format: Chocolatey uses NuGet packages, which are essentially ZIP files with specific metadata, allowing for more complex installations and dependencies, including software with Windows features. Scoop.sh, on the other hand, utilizes ZIP files containing the binaries and scripts needed for installation, focusing on standalone applications.
  5. Updates and Upgrades: Chocolatey has built-in functionality to update all installed packages with a single command or automatically at predefined intervals. Scoop.sh requires users to manually run an update command for individual packages or global updates for all installed packages.
  6. Community and Support: Chocolatey has a larger and more established community, providing comprehensive documentation, forums, and support channels. Scoop.sh, though continually growing, has a smaller community, resulting in limited official documentation and user support resources.

In Summary, Chocolatey offers a centralized package repository, supports complex installations, and has a larger community and support base, while Scoop.sh focuses on user-level installation, decentralized package repositories, and offers a simpler package format.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Chocolatey
Chocolatey
Scoop.sh
Scoop.sh

It is based on a developer-centric package manager called NuGet. Unlike manual installations, It adds, updates, and uninstalls programs in the background requiring very little user interaction.

It installs programs to your home directory by default. So you don’t need admin permissions to install programs, and you won’t see UAC popups every time you need to add or remove a program.

works with all existing software installation technologies; works with runtime binaries and zip archives
GUI wizard-style installers;Scriptable;Minimal amount of friction
Statistics
Stacks
96
Stacks
24
Followers
124
Followers
29
Votes
0
Votes
0
Integrations
Ansible
Ansible
Windows
Windows
Windows
Windows

What are some alternatives to Chocolatey, Scoop.sh?

Meteor

Meteor

A Meteor application is a mix of JavaScript that runs inside a client web browser, JavaScript that runs on the Meteor server inside a Node.js container, and all the supporting HTML fragments, CSS rules, and static assets.

Bower

Bower

Bower is a package manager for the web. It offers a generic, unopinionated solution to the problem of front-end package management, while exposing the package dependency model via an API that can be consumed by a more opinionated build stack. There are no system wide dependencies, no dependencies are shared between different apps, and the dependency tree is flat.

Elm

Elm

Writing HTML apps is super easy with elm-lang/html. Not only does it render extremely fast, it also quietly guides you towards well-architected code.

Julia

Julia

Julia is a high-level, high-performance dynamic programming language for technical computing, with syntax that is familiar to users of other technical computing environments. It provides a sophisticated compiler, distributed parallel execution, numerical accuracy, and an extensive mathematical function library.

Racket

Racket

It is a general-purpose, multi-paradigm programming language based on the Scheme dialect of Lisp. It is designed to be a platform for programming language design and implementation. It is also used for scripting, computer science education, and research.

PureScript

PureScript

A small strongly typed programming language with expressive types that compiles to JavaScript, written in and inspired by Haskell.

Composer

Composer

It is a tool for dependency management in PHP. It allows you to declare the libraries your project depends on and it will manage (install/update) them for you.

pnpm

pnpm

It uses hard links and symlinks to save one version of a module only ever once on a disk. When using npm or Yarn for example, if you have 100 projects using the same version of lodash, you will have 100 copies of lodash on disk. With pnpm, lodash will be saved in a single place on the disk and a hard link will put it into the node_modules where it should be installed.

Starship (Shell Prompt)

Starship (Shell Prompt)

Starship is the minimal, blazing fast, and extremely customizable prompt for any shell! The prompt shows information you need while you're working, while staying sleek and out of the way.

picocli

picocli

Library and framework for easily building professional command line applications on the JVM (Java, Groovy, Kotlin, Scala, etc). Usage help with ANSI colors. Autocomplete. Nested subcommands. Annotations and programmatic API. Easy to include as source to avoid adding dependencies. More than just a command line parser.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot