Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Cisco Spark

9
16
+ 1
1
Microsoft Teams

2.3K
1.7K
+ 1
141
Add tool

Cisco Spark vs Microsoft Teams: What are the differences?

## Introduction

## 1. Key Integration Features: 
Cisco Spark offers seamless integration with popular applications like Microsoft Office, Trello, Salesforce, and Google Drive. In contrast, Microsoft Teams focuses primarily on integrating with other Microsoft products such as Office 365, SharePoint, and Outlook.

## 2. Guest Access: 
In Cisco Spark, external guests can be easily added to collaborate on projects without the need for creating an account. However, Microsoft Teams requires guests to have a Microsoft account, making it slightly less flexible for collaboration with external parties.

## 3. Voice and Video Calling Capabilities: 
Cisco Spark places a strong emphasis on its voice and video calling features, offering high-quality calls and conferencing capabilities. On the other hand, Microsoft Teams provides similar calling features but may not match the same level of quality and reliability as Cisco Spark.

## 4. Inclusive Pricing: 
Cisco Spark provides a straightforward pricing model with all features included in one package, making it easier for businesses to budget. Microsoft Teams, on the other hand, offers various pricing tiers and additional costs for advanced features, potentially making it more complex to manage costs effectively.

## 5. Native Integration with Hardware: 
Cisco Spark is closely integrated with Cisco's hardware solutions, such as video conferencing systems, enhancing the overall user experience. In contrast, Microsoft Teams does not have the same level of integration with hardware, which can impact the seamless use of conference room setups.

## 6. Mobile Application User Experience: 
While both platforms offer mobile applications, Cisco Spark's app is known for its intuitive design and user-friendly interface, providing a smoother user experience compared to Microsoft Teams' mobile app, which may have a steeper learning curve for new users.

In Summary, Cisco Spark and Microsoft Teams differ in their integration features, guest access, voice and video calling capabilities, pricing structures, hardware integration, and mobile application user experiences.
Decisions about Cisco Spark and Microsoft Teams
Mohammad Hossein Amri
Chief Technology Officer at Planally · | 3 upvotes · 250.4K views

we were using slack and at the same time we had a subscription with office 365. after a while we hit the slack free limitation quota. and it got annoying. the search ability was useless in free tier. and more annoying whenever you search, it opens a webpage and doesn't do it in the app.

on mobile there were many cases that I didn't get notification of important discussions. rooms was the way to separate a talk. but it become tedious. each time for a new subject that you wanted to discuss, you needed to add all the team members into a new room. and after a while the room goes silent. you will end up with a tons of not-in-use rooms that you don't want to clean up them for history purposes. also the slack UI for sub discussion is very stupid. if someone forget to check the checkbox to post the subdiscussion in the main discussion thread, other team members even won't notice such discussion is in progress.

we was paying for office 365 and thought why not give the teams a shot. we won't be in worth situation than we are. we moved to teams and we loved it instantly, we had a separate tab aggregated all the files upload. we could reply on other talk. no need of creating a new room. this way room belongs to a team and not a certain topic. our sub discussion was visible to the whole team. enjoyed integration with azure and unlimited history. the best part was integration with outlook. it was a full suit solution. our stats become busy on outlook meeting events. we get weekly analyse. we didn't need to host our wiki seperated. we've created wiki per team. the communication was much more fun.

See more
Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
Learn More
Pros of Cisco Spark
Pros of Microsoft Teams
  • 1
    Open with outside company Spark User
  • 28
    Work well with the rest of Office 365 work flow
  • 24
    Mobile friendly
  • 19
    Free
  • 12
    Great integrations
  • 12
    Well-thought Design
  • 10
    Channels
  • 8
    Easy setup
  • 6
    Unlimited users
  • 5
    Strong search and data archiving
  • 5
    Easy to integrate with
  • 4
    Multi domain switching support
  • 3
    Web interface
  • 3
    Same interface on multiple platforms
  • 2
    Great voice quality

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of Cisco Spark
Cons of Microsoft Teams
    Be the first to leave a con
    • 17
      Confusing UI
    • 12
      Bad performance on init and after quite a use
    • 10
      Bad Usermanagement
    • 6
      No desktop client (only fat and slow electron app)
    • 6
      Can't see all members in a video meeting
    • 5
      Unable to Mute users
    • 5
      No Markdown Support
    • 4
      You don't really own your messages
    • 4
      MIssing public channels
    • 4
      Forced WYSIWYG
    • 3
      Stubborn, unused friendly
    • 3
      Challenging Onboarding
    • 3
      No linux support
    • 1
      Audio support problems

    Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

    What is Cisco Spark?

    It is an app-centric cloud-based service that provides a complete collaboration suite for teams to create, meet, message, call, whiteboard, and share, regardless of whether they're together or apart; in one continuous workstream before, during, and after meetings.

    What is Microsoft Teams?

    See content and chat history anytime, including team chats with Skype that are visible to the whole team. Private group chats are available for smaller group conversations.

    Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

    What companies use Cisco Spark?
    What companies use Microsoft Teams?
    Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
    Learn More

    Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

    What tools integrate with Cisco Spark?
    What tools integrate with Microsoft Teams?

    Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

    What are some alternatives to Cisco Spark and Microsoft Teams?
    Zoom
    Zoom unifies cloud video conferencing, simple online meetings, and cross platform group chat into one easy-to-use platform. Our solution offers the best video, audio, and screen-sharing experience across Zoom Rooms, Windows, Mac, iOS, Android, and H.323/SIP room systems.
    Webex
    Collaborate with colleagues across your organization, or halfway across the planet. Meet online and share files, information, and expertise. Collaborate from wherever you are with Webex mobile apps for IPhone, iPad, Android, or Blackberry. If you can get online, you can work together.
    Slack
    Imagine all your team communication in one place, instantly searchable, available wherever you go. That’s Slack. All your messages. All your files. And everything from Twitter, Dropbox, Google Docs, Asana, Trello, GitHub and dozens of other services. All together.
    Skype for Business
    With one click, anyone can join your online meeting, from any device. You can choose to meet right away, or schedule from Outlook for later. The meeting URL is personalized just for you.
    Jira
    Jira's secret sauce is the way it simplifies the complexities of software development into manageable units of work. Jira comes out-of-the-box with everything agile teams need to ship value to customers faster.
    See all alternatives