StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Databases
  4. Big Data As A Service
  5. Cloudera Enterprise vs RabbitMQ

Cloudera Enterprise vs RabbitMQ

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Cloudera Enterprise
Cloudera Enterprise
Stacks126
Followers172
Votes5
RabbitMQ
RabbitMQ
Stacks21.8K
Followers18.9K
Votes558
GitHub Stars13.2K
Forks4.0K

Cloudera Enterprise vs RabbitMQ: What are the differences?

<Cloudera Enterprise vs RabbitMQ - Key Differences>

1. **Scale and Purpose**: Cloudera Enterprise is a big data platform focused on managing and analyzing large volumes of data, whereas RabbitMQ is a messaging broker that facilitates communication between distributed systems and microservices. Cloudera is more geared towards data processing and analytics, while RabbitMQ is designed for messaging and communication between applications.

2. **Framework and Technology**: Cloudera Enterprise is built on Hadoop and offers a comprehensive suite of tools for managing and analyzing big data, including HDFS, Spark, and Hive. On the other hand, RabbitMQ is built on the AMQP protocol and is specifically designed for asynchronous messaging and communication between applications. Cloudera focuses on data storage and processing, while RabbitMQ focuses on message queuing and delivery.

3. **Scalability and Performance**: Cloudera Enterprise is designed to handle large-scale data processing and analysis, providing scalability and high performance for big data workloads. RabbitMQ, on the other hand, excels in message queuing and delivery, offering high throughput and low latency for communication between distributed systems and applications. The scalability and performance requirements for Cloudera and RabbitMQ differ based on their respective primary functions.

4. **Data vs Message Handling**: Cloudera Enterprise deals with the storage, processing, and analysis of large volumes of structured and unstructured data, enabling organizations to derive insights and value from their data assets. RabbitMQ, on the other hand, focuses on the reliable and efficient delivery of messages between applications and systems, ensuring that communication is seamless and robust. The distinction lies in the handling of data versus messages as the core function of each platform.

5. **Monitoring and Management**: Cloudera Enterprise offers comprehensive monitoring and management tools for tracking data workflows, ensuring data quality, and optimizing performance in a big data environment. RabbitMQ provides monitoring and management capabilities for message queues, ensuring message delivery, monitoring queue performance, and managing message processing. The focus of monitoring and management differs between Cloudera for data workflows and RabbitMQ for message queues.

6. **Integration and Ecosystem**: Cloudera Enterprise integrates with a wide range of data processing technologies, tools, and applications to build a complete data analytics ecosystem. RabbitMQ integrates with various programming languages, frameworks, and messaging protocols to support seamless communication between diverse applications and systems. The integration and ecosystem support different requirements for data analytics in Cloudera and message exchange in RabbitMQ.

In Summary, the key differences between Cloudera Enterprise and RabbitMQ lie in their focus on data storage and processing versus messaging and communication, the underlying frameworks and technologies they are built upon, scalability and performance characteristics, core functionalities of data handling versus message delivery, monitoring and management capabilities, and the integration and ecosystem support for different use cases.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Cloudera Enterprise, RabbitMQ

viradiya
viradiya

Apr 12, 2020

Needs adviceonAngularJSAngularJSASP.NET CoreASP.NET CoreMSSQLMSSQL

We are going to develop a microservices-based application. It consists of AngularJS, ASP.NET Core, and MSSQL.

We have 3 types of microservices. Emailservice, Filemanagementservice, Filevalidationservice

I am a beginner in microservices. But I have read about RabbitMQ, but come to know that there are Redis and Kafka also in the market. So, I want to know which is best.

933k views933k
Comments
Pulkit
Pulkit

Software Engineer

Oct 30, 2020

Needs adviceonDjangoDjangoAmazon SQSAmazon SQSRabbitMQRabbitMQ

Hi! I am creating a scraping system in Django, which involves long running tasks between 1 minute & 1 Day. As I am new to Message Brokers and Task Queues, I need advice on which architecture to use for my system. ( Amazon SQS, RabbitMQ, or Celery). The system should be autoscalable using Kubernetes(K8) based on the number of pending tasks in the queue.

474k views474k
Comments
Kirill
Kirill

GO/C developer at Duckling Sales

Feb 16, 2021

Decided

Maybe not an obvious comparison with Kafka, since Kafka is pretty different from rabbitmq. But for small service, Rabbit as a pubsub platform is super easy to use and pretty powerful. Kafka as an alternative was the original choice, but its really a kind of overkill for a small-medium service. Especially if you are not planning to use k8s, since pure docker deployment can be a pain because of networking setup. Google PubSub was another alternative, its actually pretty cheap, but I never tested it since Rabbit was matching really good for mailing/notification services.

266k views266k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Cloudera Enterprise
Cloudera Enterprise
RabbitMQ
RabbitMQ

Cloudera Enterprise includes CDH, the world’s most popular open source Hadoop-based platform, as well as advanced system management and data management tools plus dedicated support and community advocacy from our world-class team of Hadoop developers and experts.

RabbitMQ gives your applications a common platform to send and receive messages, and your messages a safe place to live until received.

Unified – one integrated system, bringing diverse users and application workloads to one pool of data on common infrastructure; no data movement required;Secure – perimeter security, authentication, granular authorization, and data protection;Governed – enterprise-grade data auditing, data lineage, and data discovery;Managed – native high-availability, fault-tolerance and self-healing storage, automated backup and disaster recovery, and advanced system and data management;Open – Apache-licensed open source to ensure your data and applications remain yours, and an open platform to connect with all of your existing investments in technology and skills
Robust messaging for applications;Easy to use;Runs on all major operating systems;Supports a huge number of developer platforms;Open source and commercially supported
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
13.2K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
4.0K
Stacks
126
Stacks
21.8K
Followers
172
Followers
18.9K
Votes
5
Votes
558
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 1
    Scalability
  • 1
    Multicloud
  • 1
    Hybrid cloud
  • 1
    Easily management
  • 1
    Cheeper
Pros
  • 235
    It's fast and it works with good metrics/monitoring
  • 80
    Ease of configuration
  • 60
    I like the admin interface
  • 52
    Easy to set-up and start with
  • 22
    Durable
Cons
  • 9
    Too complicated cluster/HA config and management
  • 6
    Needs Erlang runtime. Need ops good with Erlang runtime
  • 5
    Configuration must be done first, not by your code
  • 4
    Slow

What are some alternatives to Cloudera Enterprise, RabbitMQ?

Kafka

Kafka

Kafka is a distributed, partitioned, replicated commit log service. It provides the functionality of a messaging system, but with a unique design.

Celery

Celery

Celery is an asynchronous task queue/job queue based on distributed message passing. It is focused on real-time operation, but supports scheduling as well.

Amazon SQS

Amazon SQS

Transmit any volume of data, at any level of throughput, without losing messages or requiring other services to be always available. With SQS, you can offload the administrative burden of operating and scaling a highly available messaging cluster, while paying a low price for only what you use.

Google BigQuery

Google BigQuery

Run super-fast, SQL-like queries against terabytes of data in seconds, using the processing power of Google's infrastructure. Load data with ease. Bulk load your data using Google Cloud Storage or stream it in. Easy access. Access BigQuery by using a browser tool, a command-line tool, or by making calls to the BigQuery REST API with client libraries such as Java, PHP or Python.

NSQ

NSQ

NSQ is a realtime distributed messaging platform designed to operate at scale, handling billions of messages per day. It promotes distributed and decentralized topologies without single points of failure, enabling fault tolerance and high availability coupled with a reliable message delivery guarantee. See features & guarantees.

Amazon Redshift

Amazon Redshift

It is optimized for data sets ranging from a few hundred gigabytes to a petabyte or more and costs less than $1,000 per terabyte per year, a tenth the cost of most traditional data warehousing solutions.

ActiveMQ

ActiveMQ

Apache ActiveMQ is fast, supports many Cross Language Clients and Protocols, comes with easy to use Enterprise Integration Patterns and many advanced features while fully supporting JMS 1.1 and J2EE 1.4. Apache ActiveMQ is released under the Apache 2.0 License.

ZeroMQ

ZeroMQ

The 0MQ lightweight messaging kernel is a library which extends the standard socket interfaces with features traditionally provided by specialised messaging middleware products. 0MQ sockets provide an abstraction of asynchronous message queues, multiple messaging patterns, message filtering (subscriptions), seamless access to multiple transport protocols and more.

Qubole

Qubole

Qubole is a cloud based service that makes big data easy for analysts and data engineers.

Apache NiFi

Apache NiFi

An easy to use, powerful, and reliable system to process and distribute data. It supports powerful and scalable directed graphs of data routing, transformation, and system mediation logic.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase