Cloudflow vs Delta Lake

Overview

Delta Lake

Stacks105

Followers315

Votes0

GitHub Stars8.4K

Forks1.9K

Cloudflow

Stacks5

Followers13

Votes0

GitHub Stars323

Forks89

Cloudflow vs Delta Lake: What are the differences?

# Introduction
In this comparison, we will outline the key differences between Cloudflow and Delta Lake.

1. **Data Processing Methodology**: Cloudflow is a stream processing platform focused on real-time data handling, where data is processed as soon as it arrives. Delta Lake, on the other hand, is a storage layer that adds reliability to data lakes by providing ACID transactions and data versioning capabilities for batch and streaming data.

2. **Data Formats**: Cloudflow supports various data formats, including Avro, JSON, and Parquet, allowing flexibility in data processing. In contrast, Delta Lake primarily focuses on Parquet and Delta transaction log formats for optimized performance and compatibility with Spark.

3. **Architecture Integration**: Cloudflow integrates well with Kubernetes for container orchestration, providing scalability and resource management within a cloud-native environment. Delta Lake is tightly integrated with Apache Spark, allowing users to leverage Spark's processing capabilities and SQL queries directly on Delta tables.

4. **Data Consistency and Reliability**: Cloudflow ensures end-to-end data consistency in streaming pipelines by providing fault-tolerant and scalable processing. Delta Lake guarantees data reliability through features like schema enforcement, data compaction, and schema evolution without compromising data integrity.

5. **Data Versioning and Management**: Cloudflow does not provide native data versioning capabilities, whereas Delta Lake offers snapshot isolation and time travel features, enabling users to access historical versions of data for auditing, compliance, or rollbacks.

6. **Community Support and Adoption**: Cloudflow, being a relatively newer framework, has a growing community but may have limited use cases and user support compared to Delta Lake, which is widely adopted in the data engineering and analytics space with a strong open-source community backing.

In Summary, Cloudflow and Delta Lake differ in data processing methodology, data formats, architecture integration, data consistency, data versioning, and community support.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Delta Lake	Cloudflow
An open-source storage layer that brings ACID transactions to Apache Spark™ and big data workloads.	It enables you to quickly develop, orchestrate, and operate distributed streaming applications on Kubernetes. With Cloudflow, streaming applications are comprised of small composable components wired together with schema-based contracts. It can dramatically accelerate streaming application development—reducing the time required to create, package, and deploy—from weeks to hours.
ACID Transactions; Scalable Metadata Handling; Time Travel (data versioning); Open Format; Unified Batch and Streaming Source and Sink; Schema Enforcement; Schema Evolution; 100% Compatible with Apache Spark API	Apache Spark, Apache Flink, and Akka Streams; Focus only on business logic, leave the boilerplate to us; We provide all the tooling for going from business logic to a deployable Docker image; We provide Kubernetes tooling to deploy your distributed system with a single command, and manage durable connections between processing stages; With a Lightbend subscription, you get all the tools you need to provide insights, observability, and lifecycle management for evolving your distributed streaming application
Statistics
GitHub Stars 8.4K	GitHub Stars 323
GitHub Forks 1.9K	GitHub Forks 89
Stacks 105	Stacks 5
Followers 315	Followers 13
Votes 0	Votes 0
Integrations
Apache Spark Hadoop Amazon S3	Kubernetes Apache Spark Akka Apache Flink

What are some alternatives to Delta Lake, Cloudflow?

Kubernetes

Kubernetes is an open source orchestration system for Docker containers. It handles scheduling onto nodes in a compute cluster and actively manages workloads to ensure that their state matches the users declared intentions.

Rancher

Rancher is an open source container management platform that includes full distributions of Kubernetes, Apache Mesos and Docker Swarm, and makes it simple to operate container clusters on any cloud or infrastructure platform.

Docker Compose

With Compose, you define a multi-container application in a single file, then spin your application up in a single command which does everything that needs to be done to get it running.

Docker Swarm

Swarm serves the standard Docker API, so any tool which already communicates with a Docker daemon can use Swarm to transparently scale to multiple hosts: Dokku, Compose, Krane, Deis, DockerUI, Shipyard, Drone, Jenkins... and, of course, the Docker client itself.

Tutum

Tutum lets developers easily manage and run lightweight, portable, self-sufficient containers from any application. AWS-like control, Heroku-like ease. The same container that a developer builds and tests on a laptop can run at scale in Tutum.

Portainer

It is a universal container management tool. It works with Kubernetes, Docker, Docker Swarm and Azure ACI. It allows you to manage containers without needing to know platform-specific code.

Apache Spark

Spark is a fast and general processing engine compatible with Hadoop data. It can run in Hadoop clusters through YARN or Spark's standalone mode, and it can process data in HDFS, HBase, Cassandra, Hive, and any Hadoop InputFormat. It is designed to perform both batch processing (similar to MapReduce) and new workloads like streaming, interactive queries, and machine learning.

Presto

Distributed SQL Query Engine for Big Data

Amazon Athena

Amazon Athena is an interactive query service that makes it easy to analyze data in Amazon S3 using standard SQL. Athena is serverless, so there is no infrastructure to manage, and you pay only for the queries that you run.

Codefresh

Automate and parallelize testing. Codefresh allows teams to spin up on-demand compositions to run unit and integration tests as part of the continuous integration process. Jenkins integration allows more complex pipelines.

Related Comparisons

Cloudflow vs Delta Lake: What are the differences?

# Introduction
In this comparison, we will outline the key differences between Cloudflow and Delta Lake.

1. **Data Processing Methodology**: Cloudflow is a stream processing platform focused on real-time data handling, where data is processed as soon as it arrives. Delta Lake, on the other hand, is a storage layer that adds reliability to data lakes by providing ACID transactions and data versioning capabilities for batch and streaming data.

2. **Data Formats**: Cloudflow supports various data formats, including Avro, JSON, and Parquet, allowing flexibility in data processing. In contrast, Delta Lake primarily focuses on Parquet and Delta transaction log formats for optimized performance and compatibility with Spark.

3. **Architecture Integration**: Cloudflow integrates well with Kubernetes for container orchestration, providing scalability and resource management within a cloud-native environment. Delta Lake is tightly integrated with Apache Spark, allowing users to leverage Spark's processing capabilities and SQL queries directly on Delta tables.

4. **Data Consistency and Reliability**: Cloudflow ensures end-to-end data consistency in streaming pipelines by providing fault-tolerant and scalable processing. Delta Lake guarantees data reliability through features like schema enforcement, data compaction, and schema evolution without compromising data integrity.

5. **Data Versioning and Management**: Cloudflow does not provide native data versioning capabilities, whereas Delta Lake offers snapshot isolation and time travel features, enabling users to access historical versions of data for auditing, compliance, or rollbacks.

6. **Community Support and Adoption**: Cloudflow, being a relatively newer framework, has a growing community but may have limited use cases and user support compared to Delta Lake, which is widely adopted in the data engineering and analytics space with a strong open-source community backing.

In Summary, Cloudflow and Delta Lake differ in data processing methodology, data formats, architecture integration, data consistency, data versioning, and community support.

Cloudflow vs Delta Lake

Overview