StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Code Collaboration
  4. Documentation As A Service And Tools
  5. CMS.js vs Swagger UI

CMS.js vs Swagger UI

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Swagger UI
Swagger UI
Stacks2.1K
Followers1.8K
Votes207
GitHub Stars28.3K
Forks9.2K
CMS.js
CMS.js
Stacks5
Followers38
Votes0

CMS.js vs Swagger UI: What are the differences?

Introduction:

In this comparison, we will outline the key differences between CMS.js and Swagger UI, which are both popular tools in web development for managing content and documenting APIs, respectively.

  1. Purpose and Functionality: CMS.js is a lightweight content management system that enables users to create and manage digital content on their websites easily. On the other hand, Swagger UI is specifically designed for documenting APIs, allowing developers to visualize and interact with the API resources.

  2. User Interface: CMS.js provides a user-friendly and intuitive interface for content management, making it suitable for non-technical users. In contrast, Swagger UI focuses on providing a clean and organized interface for developers to view and test API endpoints.

  3. Customization Options: CMS.js offers more flexibility in terms of design customization and content layout, allowing users to tailor their websites to specific needs. Swagger UI, while customizable to some extent, prioritizes adherence to the OpenAPI specification for documenting APIs.

  4. Supported Technologies: CMS.js is primarily geared towards managing content on static websites, making it easy to integrate into various web development projects. Swagger UI, on the other hand, is specifically tailored for APIs built using REST or GraphQL, providing dedicated support for these technologies.

  5. Deployment Considerations: When deploying CMS.js, users typically integrate it into their existing website structure, allowing for seamless content management. In comparison, Swagger UI is usually hosted separately from the API servers it documents, ensuring independence and portability in the development process.

  6. Learning Curve: CMS.js is relatively straightforward to set up and use, making it an accessible choice for beginners or those with limited technical expertise. Conversely, Swagger UI may have a steeper learning curve for individuals unfamiliar with API documentation standards, requiring some time to grasp its full capabilities.

In Summary, the key differences between CMS.js and Swagger UI lie in their distinct purposes, user interfaces, customization options, supported technologies, deployment considerations, and learning curves.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Swagger UI, CMS.js

StackShare
StackShare

May 1, 2019

Needs advice

From a StackShare Community member: "I just started working for a start-up and we are in desperate need of better documentation for our API. Currently our API docs is in a README.md file. We are evaluating Postman and Swagger UI. Since there are many options and I was wondering what other StackSharers would recommend?"

382k views382k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Swagger UI
Swagger UI
CMS.js
CMS.js

Swagger UI is a dependency-free collection of HTML, Javascript, and CSS assets that dynamically generate beautiful documentation and sandbox from a Swagger-compliant API

CMS.js is fully client-side, Javascript site generator in the spirit of Jekyll that uses plain ol' HTML, CSS and Javascript to generate your website. CMS.js is like a file-based CMS. It takes your content, renders Markdown and delivers a complete website in Single-Page App fashion...without the aid of server-side scripting (no Node.js, PHP, Ruby, etc.).

The UI works in any development environment, be it locally or in the web;Allow end developers to effortlessly interact and try out every single operation your API exposes for easy consumption;Quickly find and work with resources and endpoints with neatly categorized documentation;Cater to every possible scenario with Swagger UI working in all major browsers
Can serve full GitHub repos as a site; Can serve files from an Apache server as a site
Statistics
GitHub Stars
28.3K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
9.2K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
2.1K
Stacks
5
Followers
1.8K
Followers
38
Votes
207
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 49
    Open Source
  • 34
    Can execute api calls from the documentation
  • 29
    Free to use
  • 19
    Customizable
  • 14
    Easy to implement in .Net
Cons
  • 3
    Need to learn YAML and RAML
  • 2
    Documentation doesn't look that good
  • 1
    Does not support hypermedia
  • 1
    Doesn't generate code snippets in different languages
  • 1
    You don’t actually get in-line error highlighting
No community feedback yet
Integrations
Node.js
Node.js
Git
Git
Microsoft Edge
Microsoft Edge
Safari
Safari
Firefox
Firefox
Google Chrome
Google Chrome
GitHub
GitHub

What are some alternatives to Swagger UI, CMS.js?

Postman

Postman

It is the only complete API development environment, used by nearly five million developers and more than 100,000 companies worldwide.

Jekyll

Jekyll

Think of Jekyll as a file-based CMS, without all the complexity. Jekyll takes your content, renders Markdown and Liquid templates, and spits out a complete, static website ready to be served by Apache, Nginx or another web server. Jekyll is the engine behind GitHub Pages, which you can use to host sites right from your GitHub repositories.

Hugo

Hugo

Hugo is a static site generator written in Go. It is optimized for speed, easy use and configurability. Hugo takes a directory with content and templates and renders them into a full html website. Hugo makes use of markdown files with front matter for meta data.

Gatsby

Gatsby

Gatsby lets you build blazing fast sites with your data, whatever the source. Liberate your sites from legacy CMSs and fly into the future.

Apiary

Apiary

It takes more than a simple HTML page to thrill your API users. The right tools take weeks of development. Weeks that apiary.io saves.

Hexo

Hexo

Hexo is a fast, simple and powerful blog framework. It parses your posts with Markdown or other render engine and generates static files with the beautiful theme. All of these just take seconds.

ReadMe.io

ReadMe.io

It is an easy-to-use tool to help you build out documentation! Each documentation site that you publish is a project where there is space for documentation, interactive API reference guides, a changelog, and much more.

Middleman

Middleman

Middleman is a command-line tool for creating static websites using all the shortcuts and tools of the modern web development environment.

Gridsome

Gridsome

Build websites using latest web tech tools that developers love - Vue.js, GraphQL and Webpack. Get hot-reloading and all the power of Node.js. Gridsome makes building websites fun again.

Docusaurus

Docusaurus

Docusaurus is a project for easily building, deploying, and maintaining open source project websites.

Related Comparisons

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

Mapbox
Google Maps

Google Maps vs Mapbox

Mapbox
Leaflet

Leaflet vs Mapbox vs OpenLayers

Twilio SendGrid
Mailgun

Mailgun vs Mandrill vs SendGrid

Runscope
Postman

Paw vs Postman vs Runscope