Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
COBOL vs Common Lisp: What are the differences?
Key Differences between COBOL and Common Lisp
COBOL (Common Business-Oriented Language) and Common Lisp are two programming languages with distinct characteristics and purposes. Here are the key differences between the two:
Syntax and Purpose: COBOL is primarily used for business-oriented applications and system programming, whereas Common Lisp is a general-purpose language often used in artificial intelligence (AI) and symbolic computing. COBOL's syntax is more verbose and English-like, while Common Lisp uses a more flexible and concise syntax with strong support for functional programming.
Data Types and Abstraction: COBOL has a fixed set of built-in data types designed for traditional data processing, such as numbers and strings. In contrast, Common Lisp offers a rich set of built-in data types and supports user-defined data structures, making it more suitable for complex data manipulation and abstraction.
Procedural vs Functional Paradigm: COBOL follows a procedural programming paradigm where computations are organized as a sequence of steps, while Common Lisp supports both procedural and functional programming. Lisp's functional programming features, such as higher-order functions and anonymous functions, provide powerful abstractions and enable elegant solutions to complex problems.
Legacy vs Modern Usage: COBOL has a long history, dating back to the 1960s, and is still widely used in legacy systems, particularly in the financial industry. On the other hand, Common Lisp is often used in modern applications that require advanced language features, such as AI, expert systems, and rapid prototyping.
Libraries and Ecosystem: COBOL has a more limited set of libraries and frameworks compared to Common Lisp, as it is often used in specialized domains with specific requirements. Common Lisp, being more versatile, has a larger ecosystem of libraries and frameworks that cover a wide range of application domains, providing developers with ample tools and resources.
Level of Standardization: COBOL has a well-defined ANSI standard and multiple language versions, with some variations existing between implementations. Conversely, Common Lisp has a common standard called ANSI Common Lisp, which ensures code portability across different implementations.
In Summary, COBOL is a business-oriented programming language with a focus on traditional data processing, while Common Lisp is a versatile language used for a broader range of applications, including AI and symbolic computing. Lisp offers a richer feature set, functional programming capabilities, and a more extensive ecosystem compared to COBOL.
Pros of COBOL
- Business Oriented Language2
Pros of Common Lisp
- Flexibility24
- High-performance22
- Comfortable: garbage collection, closures, macros, REPL17
- Stable13
- Lisp12
- Code is data8
- Can integrate with C (via CFFI)6
- Multi paradigm6
- Lisp is fun5
- Macros4
- Easy Setup4
- Parentheses3
- Open source3
- Purelly functional3
- Elegant3
- DSLs1
- Multiple values1
- CLOS/MOP1
- Clean semantics1
- Will still be relevant 100 years from now1
- Still decades ahead of almost all programming languages1
- Best programming language1
- Simple syntax1
- Powerful1
- Generic functions1
- Can implement almost any feature as a library1
- Formal specification, multiple implementations1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of COBOL
- Extremely long code for simple functions2
Cons of Common Lisp
- Too many Parentheses4
- Standard did not evolve since 19943
- Small library ecosystem2
- No hygienic macros2
- Inadequate community infrastructure1
- Ultra-conservative community1