StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Code Review
  4. Code Review
  5. Code Climate vs Hound

Code Climate vs Hound

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Code Climate
Code Climate
Stacks740
Followers497
Votes285
Hound
Hound
Stacks41
Followers47
Votes14

Code Climate vs Hound: What are the differences?

  1. Integration with Multiple Languages: Code Climate supports various programming languages like Ruby, Java, JavaScript, PHP, Python, and more, while Hound focuses specifically on Ruby code.
  2. Detailed Code Review: Code Climate provides a detailed code review analysis with various metrics like complexity, duplication, style violations, security vulnerabilities, and more, whereas Hound solely focuses on style guide adherence.
  3. Customizable Configuration: Code Climate allows users to customize and configure the analysis tools and create specific rules for their projects, whereas Hound has a fixed set of style guide rules that cannot be modified or customized.
  4. Automated Pull Request Comments: Code Climate can automatically post comments on pull requests in GitHub with analysis results and suggestions, whereas Hound does not have this feature.
  5. Support for Code Repositories: Code Climate can analyze code from Git repositories hosted on various platforms like GitHub, Bitbucket, and GitLab, while Hound is specifically designed for GitHub repositories.
  6. Support for Continuous Integration: Code Climate provides integration with popular CI/CD tools like Jenkins, Travis CI, and CircleCI, enabling automated code quality checks in the CI pipeline, whereas Hound lacks this integration.

In Summary, Code Climate offers a more comprehensive code analysis experience with support for multiple languages, detailed metrics, customization options, automated pull request comments, code repository compatibility, and continuous integration support, while Hound focuses on Ruby code with a primary emphasis on style guide adherence.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Code Climate, Hound

vipul
vipul

Aug 18, 2022

Needs adviceonJavaJavaSonarQubeSonarQube

We have heavy Oracle ERP customizations in the company and some amount of Java/JSP customizations, for which the QA team has to do code review manually. For Java code review SonarQube may be good, but is it the best? And for PL/SQL, Oracle Forms/Oracle reports which tool can do Code review automation?

Please suggest.

27.6k views27.6k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Code Climate
Code Climate
Hound
Hound

After each Git push, Code Climate analyzes your code for complexity, duplication, and common smells to determine changes in quality and surface technical debt hotspots.

Automated code review for GitHub pull requests. It comments on code quality and style issues, allowing you and your team to better review and maintain a clean codebase.

Automated Git Updates- Nothing to install. Code Climate runs everytime you push a new commit.;Activity Feeds- Up-to-the-minute information so you can see when and how code changes.;Instant Notifications- Major security and quality changes pushed to where you work: email, Campfire, HipChat, and RSS feeds.;Team Sharing- Instant access for your whole team to maximize code visibility across projects.;Hotspots- A hit list for refactoring. Target your messiest areas one-by-one.;Duplication Detection- Fuzzy matching algorithm finds DRY-violations that human reviewers might miss.;Email Notification- Instant email notifications to let you know when new security and code issues arise;Security Dashboard- Organized listing of your app's vulnerabilities, including when they were first introduced and how to address them.;Alerts for New Rails Disclosures- Going beyond Gemfile analysis to let you know whether you're at high risk based on how your specific code uses a vulnerable library.;Start Fixing with One Click- Full integration with Pivotal Tracker, GitHub Issues, and Lighthouse lets you open tickets instantly.;GitHub Integration- Post-receive hooks for instant updates and GitHub drilldown links throughout.;Test Coverage Integration- Surfacing coverage information at the repo, class, and source listing level.;Private, Safe, and Secure- All data is private by default. SSL encryption everywhere.
Open source; Free for public repos; Automated reviews of GitHub pull requests;GitHub App
Statistics
Stacks
740
Stacks
41
Followers
497
Followers
47
Votes
285
Votes
14
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 71
    Auto sync with Github
  • 49
    Simple grade system that motivates to keep code clean
  • 45
    Better coding
  • 30
    Free for open source
  • 21
    Hotspots for quick refactoring candidates
Cons
  • 2
    Learning curve, static analysis comparable to eslint
  • 1
    Complains about small stylistic decisions
Pros
  • 4
    Comments on style so I don't have to
  • 3
    Easy configuration
  • 3
    Fast
  • 2
    Inline comments
  • 2
    Free for OSS
Integrations
GitHub
GitHub
HipChat
HipChat
Campfire
Campfire
Semaphore
Semaphore
ESLint
ESLint
GitHub
GitHub
SwiftLint
SwiftLint
RuboCop
RuboCop
Credo
Credo

What are some alternatives to Code Climate, Hound?

Codacy

Codacy

Codacy automates code reviews and monitors code quality on every commit and pull request on more than 40 programming languages reporting back the impact of every commit or PR, issues concerning code style, best practices and security.

Phabricator

Phabricator

Phabricator is a collection of open source web applications that help software companies build better software.

PullReview

PullReview

PullReview helps Ruby and Rails developers to develop new features cleanly, on-time, and with confidence by automatically reviewing their code.

Gerrit Code Review

Gerrit Code Review

Gerrit is a self-hosted pre-commit code review tool. It serves as a Git hosting server with option to comment incoming changes. It is highly configurable and extensible with default guarding policies, webhooks, project access control and more.

SonarQube

SonarQube

SonarQube provides an overview of the overall health of your source code and even more importantly, it highlights issues found on new code. With a Quality Gate set on your project, you will simply fix the Leak and start mechanically improving.

RuboCop

RuboCop

RuboCop is a Ruby static code analyzer. Out of the box it will enforce many of the guidelines outlined in the community Ruby Style Guide.

CodeFactor.io

CodeFactor.io

CodeFactor.io automatically and continuously tracks code quality with every GitHub or BitBucket commit and pull request, helping software developers save time in code reviews and efficiently tackle technical debt.

ESLint

ESLint

A pluggable and configurable linter tool for identifying and reporting on patterns in JavaScript. Maintain your code quality with ease.

Amazon CodeGuru

Amazon CodeGuru

It is a machine learning service for automated code reviews and application performance recommendations. It helps you find the most expensive lines of code that hurt application performance and keep you up all night troubleshooting, then gives you specific recommendations to fix or improve your code.

Reviewable

Reviewable

A code review tool for GitHub pull requests inspired by Google's internal tool. Powerful diffing and workflow features wrapped in a beautiful UI, with seamless GitHub integration. Free for public repos.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana