StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Code Review
  4. Code Review
  5. Code Climate vs JaCoCo

Code Climate vs JaCoCo

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Code Climate
Code Climate
Stacks740
Followers497
Votes285
JaCoCo
JaCoCo
Stacks223
Followers82
Votes0
GitHub Stars4.4K
Forks1.2K

Code Climate vs JaCoCo: What are the differences?

Introduction

Code Climate and JaCoCo are both code analysis tools used in software development to measure and improve code quality. While they serve similar purposes, there are key differences between the two tools.

1. Code Analysis Scope: Code Climate focuses on analyzing code quality and identifying technical debt, providing insights on code complexity, duplication, and potential bugs. It offers a wide range of code metrics and helps developers maintain code quality standards. In contrast, JaCoCo is specifically designed for code coverage analysis, measuring how much of the code is exercised by tests, ensuring thorough testing coverage.

2. Supported Languages: Code Climate supports a wide variety of programming languages, including Ruby, JavaScript, Java, Python, and more. It offers language-specific engines and plugins to analyze code in different languages. On the other hand, JaCoCo is primarily used for Java applications and provides extensive code coverage analysis specifically for Java projects.

3. Integration with CI/CD: Code Climate seamlessly integrates with popular continuous integration and delivery (CI/CD) tools like GitHub Actions, Bitbucket Pipelines, and Travis CI. It provides automatic code analysis and reports within the CI/CD pipeline, allowing developers to catch issues early. Conversely, JaCoCo can also be integrated into CI/CD pipelines, but it requires additional configuration and setup to generate coverage reports.

4. Customizable Analysis Configuration: Code Climate allows developers to customize and configure code analysis rules based on their specific requirements. It provides a flexible configuration file to adjust the analysis process according to the project's needs. In contrast, JaCoCo has limited configuration options and focuses mainly on providing detailed coverage reports rather than customizable analysis rules.

5. Visualization and Reporting: Code Climate offers visually appealing and intuitive dashboards to display code analysis results. It provides actionable insights, trends, and historical data to track code quality over time. JaCoCo, on the other hand, primarily focuses on generating detailed coverage reports in various formats, such as HTML and XML, which can be used for further analysis and reporting.

6. Community and Ecosystem: Code Climate has a thriving community and an extensive ecosystem of plugins and integrations with other development tools. It benefits from a large user base, actively contributing to the improvement and expansion of the tool's capabilities. JaCoCo, being mainly focused on Java, also has a community but is not as extensive as Code Climate's community.

In summary, Code Climate provides comprehensive code analysis with customizable rules and supports multiple languages, while JaCoCo is mainly focused on code coverage analysis for Java projects with limited configurability. Code Climate also has a more extensive community and ecosystem compared to JaCoCo.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Code Climate
Code Climate
JaCoCo
JaCoCo

After each Git push, Code Climate analyzes your code for complexity, duplication, and common smells to determine changes in quality and surface technical debt hotspots.

It is a free code coverage library for Java, which has been created based on the lessons learned from using and integration existing libraries for many years.

Automated Git Updates- Nothing to install. Code Climate runs everytime you push a new commit.;Activity Feeds- Up-to-the-minute information so you can see when and how code changes.;Instant Notifications- Major security and quality changes pushed to where you work: email, Campfire, HipChat, and RSS feeds.;Team Sharing- Instant access for your whole team to maximize code visibility across projects.;Hotspots- A hit list for refactoring. Target your messiest areas one-by-one.;Duplication Detection- Fuzzy matching algorithm finds DRY-violations that human reviewers might miss.;Email Notification- Instant email notifications to let you know when new security and code issues arise;Security Dashboard- Organized listing of your app's vulnerabilities, including when they were first introduced and how to address them.;Alerts for New Rails Disclosures- Going beyond Gemfile analysis to let you know whether you're at high risk based on how your specific code uses a vulnerable library.;Start Fixing with One Click- Full integration with Pivotal Tracker, GitHub Issues, and Lighthouse lets you open tickets instantly.;GitHub Integration- Post-receive hooks for instant updates and GitHub drilldown links throughout.;Test Coverage Integration- Surfacing coverage information at the repo, class, and source listing level.;Private, Safe, and Secure- All data is private by default. SSL encryption everywhere.
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
4.4K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
1.2K
Stacks
740
Stacks
223
Followers
497
Followers
82
Votes
285
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 71
    Auto sync with Github
  • 49
    Simple grade system that motivates to keep code clean
  • 45
    Better coding
  • 30
    Free for open source
  • 21
    Hotspots for quick refactoring candidates
Cons
  • 2
    Learning curve, static analysis comparable to eslint
  • 1
    Complains about small stylistic decisions
No community feedback yet
Integrations
GitHub
GitHub
HipChat
HipChat
Campfire
Campfire
Semaphore
Semaphore
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Code Climate, JaCoCo?

Codacy

Codacy

Codacy automates code reviews and monitors code quality on every commit and pull request on more than 40 programming languages reporting back the impact of every commit or PR, issues concerning code style, best practices and security.

Phabricator

Phabricator

Phabricator is a collection of open source web applications that help software companies build better software.

PullReview

PullReview

PullReview helps Ruby and Rails developers to develop new features cleanly, on-time, and with confidence by automatically reviewing their code.

Gerrit Code Review

Gerrit Code Review

Gerrit is a self-hosted pre-commit code review tool. It serves as a Git hosting server with option to comment incoming changes. It is highly configurable and extensible with default guarding policies, webhooks, project access control and more.

SonarQube

SonarQube

SonarQube provides an overview of the overall health of your source code and even more importantly, it highlights issues found on new code. With a Quality Gate set on your project, you will simply fix the Leak and start mechanically improving.

RuboCop

RuboCop

RuboCop is a Ruby static code analyzer. Out of the box it will enforce many of the guidelines outlined in the community Ruby Style Guide.

CodeFactor.io

CodeFactor.io

CodeFactor.io automatically and continuously tracks code quality with every GitHub or BitBucket commit and pull request, helping software developers save time in code reviews and efficiently tackle technical debt.

ESLint

ESLint

A pluggable and configurable linter tool for identifying and reporting on patterns in JavaScript. Maintain your code quality with ease.

Amazon CodeGuru

Amazon CodeGuru

It is a machine learning service for automated code reviews and application performance recommendations. It helps you find the most expensive lines of code that hurt application performance and keep you up all night troubleshooting, then gives you specific recommendations to fix or improve your code.

Reviewable

Reviewable

A code review tool for GitHub pull requests inspired by Google's internal tool. Powerful diffing and workflow features wrapped in a beautiful UI, with seamless GitHub integration. Free for public repos.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana