Code Climate vs Pylint

Overview

Code Climate

Stacks740

Followers497

Votes285

Pylint

Stacks873

Followers97

Votes17

Code Climate vs Pylint: What are the differences?

Comparing Code Climate and Pylint

Code Climate and Pylint are two popular static code analysis tools used for identifying and correcting code quality issues in software projects. While both tools serve a similar purpose, there are key differences between them that set them apart.

Analysis Languages: Code Climate supports a wide range of programming languages including Ruby, JavaScript, PHP, Python, and more. On the other hand, Pylint is primarily designed for analyzing Python code only. This makes Code Climate more versatile for multi-language projects.
Analysis Scope: Code Climate provides a holistic approach to code analysis by analyzing not only the code itself but also aspects like test coverage, duplication, security vulnerabilities, and more. Pylint, on the other hand, focuses solely on analyzing code quality and adherence to coding standards.
Rule Customization: Code Climate allows users to customize and configure the analysis rules and thresholds based on their specific requirements. This flexibility gives developers the ability to tailor the analysis to their project's unique needs. Pylint, on the other hand, provides a fixed set of predefined rules that cannot be easily customized.
Integration and Interoperability: Code Climate integrates with popular code hosting platforms like GitHub and Bitbucket, providing seamless integration into the development workflow. It also supports integration with popular CI/CD tools like Jenkins and Travis CI. Pylint, on the other hand, can be integrated into various editors and IDEs like VS Code and PyCharm for real-time code analysis within the development environment.
Community and Support: Code Climate has a large and active community of developers, contributing to the open-source tooling and sharing knowledge. It provides extensive documentation, guides, and forums for support. Pylint also has an active community and provides support through its documentation and mailing lists, but it may not have the same level of community participation as Code Climate.
Pricing Model: Code Climate offers both free and paid plans, with the paid plans providing additional features and support. Pylint, on the other hand, is an open-source tool and is available free of charge, making it a cost-effective option for projects with budget constraints.

In summary, Code Climate provides multi-language analysis, a holistic approach to code quality, rule customization, seamless integration, extensive community support, and offers both free and paid plans. On the other hand, Pylint is specifically designed for Python code analysis, focuses on code quality, provides integration with popular editors/IDEs, has an active community, and is available free of charge.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Code Climate	Pylint
After each Git push, Code Climate analyzes your code for complexity, duplication, and common smells to determine changes in quality and surface technical debt hotspots.	It is a Python static code analysis tool which looks for programming errors, helps enforcing a coding standard, sniffs for code smells and offers simple refactoring suggestions.
Automated Git Updates- Nothing to install. Code Climate runs everytime you push a new commit.;Activity Feeds- Up-to-the-minute information so you can see when and how code changes.;Instant Notifications- Major security and quality changes pushed to where you work: email, Campfire, HipChat, and RSS feeds.;Team Sharing- Instant access for your whole team to maximize code visibility across projects.;Hotspots- A hit list for refactoring. Target your messiest areas one-by-one.;Duplication Detection- Fuzzy matching algorithm finds DRY-violations that human reviewers might miss.;Email Notification- Instant email notifications to let you know when new security and code issues arise;Security Dashboard- Organized listing of your app's vulnerabilities, including when they were first introduced and how to address them.;Alerts for New Rails Disclosures- Going beyond Gemfile analysis to let you know whether you're at high risk based on how your specific code uses a vulnerable library.;Start Fixing with One Click- Full integration with Pivotal Tracker, GitHub Issues, and Lighthouse lets you open tickets instantly.;GitHub Integration- Post-receive hooks for instant updates and GitHub drilldown links throughout.;Test Coverage Integration- Surfacing coverage information at the repo, class, and source listing level.;Private, Safe, and Secure- All data is private by default. SSL encryption everywhere.	Syntax Check;Style Check;Warnings
Statistics
Stacks 740	Stacks 873
Followers 497	Followers 97
Votes 285	Votes 17
Pros & Cons
Pros 71 Auto sync with Github 49 Simple grade system that motivates to keep code clean 45 Better coding 30 Free for open source 21 Hotspots for quick refactoring candidates Cons 2 Learning curve, static analysis comparable to eslint 1 Complains about small stylistic decisions	Pros 3 Command Line 2 Code score & directions 2 Spell Check strings & comments 2 Pre-commit checks 2 Standards
Integrations
GitHub HipChat Campfire Semaphore	FreeBSD Debian Vim Windows Mac OS X TextMate Visual Studio Komodo IDE Eclipse Visual Studio Code

What are some alternatives to Code Climate, Pylint?

Codacy

Codacy automates code reviews and monitors code quality on every commit and pull request on more than 40 programming languages reporting back the impact of every commit or PR, issues concerning code style, best practices and security.

Phabricator

Phabricator is a collection of open source web applications that help software companies build better software.

PullReview

PullReview helps Ruby and Rails developers to develop new features cleanly, on-time, and with confidence by automatically reviewing their code.

Gerrit Code Review

Gerrit is a self-hosted pre-commit code review tool. It serves as a Git hosting server with option to comment incoming changes. It is highly configurable and extensible with default guarding policies, webhooks, project access control and more.

SonarQube

SonarQube provides an overview of the overall health of your source code and even more importantly, it highlights issues found on new code. With a Quality Gate set on your project, you will simply fix the Leak and start mechanically improving.

RuboCop

RuboCop is a Ruby static code analyzer. Out of the box it will enforce many of the guidelines outlined in the community Ruby Style Guide.

CodeFactor.io

CodeFactor.io automatically and continuously tracks code quality with every GitHub or BitBucket commit and pull request, helping software developers save time in code reviews and efficiently tackle technical debt.

ESLint

A pluggable and configurable linter tool for identifying and reporting on patterns in JavaScript. Maintain your code quality with ease.

Amazon CodeGuru

It is a machine learning service for automated code reviews and application performance recommendations. It helps you find the most expensive lines of code that hurt application performance and keep you up all night troubleshooting, then gives you specific recommendations to fix or improve your code.

Reviewable

A code review tool for GitHub pull requests inspired by Google's internal tool. Powerful diffing and workflow features wrapped in a beautiful UI, with seamless GitHub integration. Free for public repos.

Related Comparisons

Code Climate vs Pylint: What are the differences?

Comparing Code Climate and Pylint

Analysis Languages: Code Climate supports a wide range of programming languages including Ruby, JavaScript, PHP, Python, and more. On the other hand, Pylint is primarily designed for analyzing Python code only. This makes Code Climate more versatile for multi-language projects.
Analysis Scope: Code Climate provides a holistic approach to code analysis by analyzing not only the code itself but also aspects like test coverage, duplication, security vulnerabilities, and more. Pylint, on the other hand, focuses solely on analyzing code quality and adherence to coding standards.
Rule Customization: Code Climate allows users to customize and configure the analysis rules and thresholds based on their specific requirements. This flexibility gives developers the ability to tailor the analysis to their project's unique needs. Pylint, on the other hand, provides a fixed set of predefined rules that cannot be easily customized.
Integration and Interoperability: Code Climate integrates with popular code hosting platforms like GitHub and Bitbucket, providing seamless integration into the development workflow. It also supports integration with popular CI/CD tools like Jenkins and Travis CI. Pylint, on the other hand, can be integrated into various editors and IDEs like VS Code and PyCharm for real-time code analysis within the development environment.
Community and Support: Code Climate has a large and active community of developers, contributing to the open-source tooling and sharing knowledge. It provides extensive documentation, guides, and forums for support. Pylint also has an active community and provides support through its documentation and mailing lists, but it may not have the same level of community participation as Code Climate.
Pricing Model: Code Climate offers both free and paid plans, with the paid plans providing additional features and support. Pylint, on the other hand, is an open-source tool and is available free of charge, making it a cost-effective option for projects with budget constraints.

Code Climate vs Pylint

Overview

Code Climate vs Pylint: What are the differences?