StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Testing Frameworks
  4. Testing Frameworks
  5. Codeception vs Cypress

Codeception vs Cypress

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Codeception
Codeception
Stacks155
Followers111
Votes5
Cypress
Cypress
Stacks3.5K
Followers2.0K
Votes115
GitHub Stars49.4K
Forks3.4K

Codeception vs Cypress: What are the differences?

Key Differences between Codeception and Cypress

Codeception and Cypress are both popular automation testing frameworks used for web applications. However, there are several key differences between the two:

  1. Installation and Setup: Codeception requires a complex installation process, with the need to configure various dependencies and modules. On the other hand, Cypress has a simple installation process, where you only need to install the Cypress package using npm or yarn.

  2. Syntax and Test Writing: Codeception uses the PHP programming language for writing tests, allowing developers to leverage their PHP knowledge and libraries. In contrast, Cypress uses JavaScript, making it more accessible for developers who are proficient in JavaScript.

  3. Architecture: Codeception follows a modular architecture, with separate modules for acceptance, functional, and unit testing. This allows for better organization and separation of concerns. In contrast, Cypress follows a single-page application (SPA) architecture, where all the testing resources are loaded into the browser, providing a consistent and seamless experience.

  4. Testing Capabilities: Codeception supports different types of testing like acceptance, functional, and unit testing, making it suitable for testing multiple layers of an application. On the other hand, Cypress is primarily focused on end-to-end testing, providing a rich set of APIs and features specifically designed for this type of testing.

  5. User Interface and Reporting: Codeception provides a graphical user interface (GUI) for viewing test results and generating reports, making it easy to analyze and track test executions. Cypress, on the other hand, provides a command-line interface (CLI) and a built-in dashboard for viewing test runs and test results, allowing for easy integration with CI/CD pipelines.

  6. Cross-Browser Testing: Codeception supports cross-browser testing through Selenium WebDriver, making it compatible with multiple browsers. Cypress, on the other hand, does not support cross-browser testing out of the box, as it is primarily focused on testing in a single browser (Chrome) for consistent and reliable results.

**In Summary, Codeception and Cypress differ in terms of installation and setup, syntax and test writing, architecture, testing capabilities, user interface and reporting, and cross-browser testing capabilities. These differences make them suitable for different testing scenarios and requirements.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Codeception, Cypress

Dane
Dane

Feb 7, 2020

Needs adviceonCypressCypressJestJest

As we all know testing is an important part of any application. To assist with our testing we are going to use both Cypress and Jest. We feel these tools complement each other and will help us get good coverage of our code. We will use Cypress for our end to end testing as we've found it quite user friendly. Jest will be used for our unit tests because we've seen how many larger companies use it with great success.

836k views836k
Comments
Yildiz
Yildiz

testmanager/automation tester at medicalservice

May 12, 2020

Needs adviceonAngularJSAngularJSTypeScriptTypeScriptCypressCypress

In the company I will be building test automation framework and my new company develops apps mainly using AngularJS/TypeScript. I was planning to build Protractor-Jasmine framework but a friend of mine told me about Cypress and heard that its users are very satisfied with it. I am trying to understand the capabilities of Cypress and as the final goal to differentiate these two tools. Can anyone advice me on this in a nutshell pls...

277k views277k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Codeception
Codeception
Cypress
Cypress

Full-stack testing framework for PHP. Run browsers tests, framework tests, APIs tests, unit tests with ease.

Cypress is a front end automated testing application created for the modern web. Cypress is built on a new architecture and runs in the same run-loop as the application being tested. As a result Cypress provides better, faster, and more reliable testing for anything that runs in a browser. Cypress works on any front-end framework or website.

-
Time Travel; Debuggability; Automatic Waiting; Spies, Stubs, and Clocks; Network Traffic Control; Consistent Results; Screenshots and Videos
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
49.4K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
3.4K
Stacks
155
Stacks
3.5K
Followers
111
Followers
2.0K
Votes
5
Votes
115
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 4
    Easy to get up and running some simple tests
Pros
  • 29
    Open source
  • 22
    Great documentation
  • 20
    Simple usage
  • 18
    Fast
  • 10
    Cross Browser testing
Cons
  • 21
    Cypress is weak at cross-browser testing
  • 14
    Switch tabs : Cypress can'nt support
  • 12
    No iFrame support
  • 9
    No page object support
  • 9
    No multiple domain support

What are some alternatives to Codeception, Cypress?

Mocha

Mocha

Mocha is a feature-rich JavaScript test framework running on node.js and the browser, making asynchronous testing simple and fun. Mocha tests run serially, allowing for flexible and accurate reporting, while mapping uncaught exceptions to the correct test cases.

Jasmine

Jasmine

Jasmine is a Behavior Driven Development testing framework for JavaScript. It does not rely on browsers, DOM, or any JavaScript framework. Thus it's suited for websites, Node.js projects, or anywhere that JavaScript can run.

Jest

Jest

Jest provides you with multiple layers on top of Jasmine.

Robot Framework

Robot Framework

It is a generic test automation framework for acceptance testing and acceptance test-driven development. It has easy-to-use tabular test data syntax and it utilizes the keyword-driven testing approach. Its testing capabilities can be extended by test libraries implemented either with Python or Java, and users can create new higher-level keywords from existing ones using the same syntax that is used for creating test cases.

Karate DSL

Karate DSL

Combines API test-automation, mocks and performance-testing into a single, unified framework. The BDD syntax popularized by Cucumber is language-neutral, and easy for even non-programmers. Besides powerful JSON & XML assertions, you can run tests in parallel for speed - which is critical for HTTP API testing.

CodeceptJS

CodeceptJS

It is a modern end to end testing framework with a special BDD-style syntax. The test is written as a linear scenario of user's action on a site. Each test is described inside a Scenario function with I object passed into it.

Cucumber

Cucumber

Cucumber is a tool that supports Behaviour-Driven Development (BDD) - a software development process that aims to enhance software quality and reduce maintenance costs.

Protractor

Protractor

Protractor is an end-to-end test framework for Angular and AngularJS applications. Protractor runs tests against your application running in a real browser, interacting with it as a user would.

AVA

AVA

Even though JavaScript is single-threaded, IO in Node.js can happen in parallel due to its async nature. AVA takes advantage of this and runs your tests concurrently, which is especially beneficial for IO heavy tests. In addition, test files are run in parallel as separate processes, giving you even better performance and an isolated environment for each test file.

TestCafe

TestCafe

It is a pure node.js end-to-end solution for testing web apps. It takes care of all the stages: starting browsers, running tests, gathering test results and generating reports.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana