StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Testing Frameworks
  4. Testing Frameworks
  5. Codeception vs PHPUnit

Codeception vs PHPUnit

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

PHPUnit
PHPUnit
Stacks2.8K
Followers287
Votes14
GitHub Stars20.0K
Forks2.2K
Codeception
Codeception
Stacks155
Followers111
Votes5

Codeception vs PHPUnit: What are the differences?

Introduction

Codeception and PHPUnit are both testing frameworks used in software development. While they serve a similar purpose of writing and executing tests, there are key differences between the two.

  1. Configuration and Installation: Codeception provides built-in configuration for different testing types, such as unit, functional, and acceptance testing. It also has a command-line interface (CLI) for easy installation and setup. On the other hand, PHPUnit requires manual configuration and installation, and does not have a CLI for setup.

  2. Testing Styles: Codeception follows a behavior-driven development (BDD) approach, allowing tests to be written in a more descriptive and readable manner. It supports high-level acceptance testing and integrates with frameworks like Cucumber. PHPUnit, on the other hand, follows a traditional unit testing style, focusing on individual units of code.

  3. Test Execution: Codeception allows tests to be executed in multiple environments and browsers, making it suitable for web application testing. It also provides parallel test execution capabilities. PHPUnit, on the other hand, primarily focuses on running tests within the development environment and does not provide built-in parallel test execution.

  4. Assertions and Matchers: Codeception provides a wide range of built-in assertions and matchers, making it easy to write expressive tests. It also supports custom assertions and has a rich set of built-in testing methods. PHPUnit, on the other hand, offers a comprehensive set of assertion and matcher functions, but may require more verbose code to achieve the same level of expressiveness.

  5. Test Coverage Reporting: Codeception includes built-in support for generating code coverage reports, allowing developers to identify areas of code that are not adequately tested. PHPUnit also has code coverage reporting capabilities, but requires additional configuration and setup to enable this feature.

  6. Integration with Frameworks: Codeception integrates well with popular PHP frameworks like Laravel, Symfony, and Yii, providing additional testing capabilities specific to these frameworks. PHPUnit, on the other hand, has a broader focus on general-purpose testing and does not provide extensive integration with specific frameworks.

In summary, Codeception offers a more comprehensive and feature-rich testing framework with built-in configurations, BDD-style testing, and easy test execution in different environments. On the other hand, PHPUnit is a widely-used unit testing framework that focuses on traditional unit testing styles and provides extensive assertion functions.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

PHPUnit
PHPUnit
Codeception
Codeception

PHPUnit is a programmer-oriented testing framework for PHP. It is an instance of the xUnit architecture for unit testing frameworks.

Full-stack testing framework for PHP. Run browsers tests, framework tests, APIs tests, unit tests with ease.

Statistics
GitHub Stars
20.0K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
2.2K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
2.8K
Stacks
155
Followers
287
Followers
111
Votes
14
Votes
5
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 5
    TDD Unit Testing
  • 2
    Software Quality
  • 2
    TDD Acceptance Testing
  • 2
    TDD Integration Testing
  • 1
    Unit Testing
Cons
  • 1
    Mocked services require more effort and understanding
Pros
  • 4
    Easy to get up and running some simple tests

What are some alternatives to PHPUnit, Codeception?

Robot Framework

Robot Framework

It is a generic test automation framework for acceptance testing and acceptance test-driven development. It has easy-to-use tabular test data syntax and it utilizes the keyword-driven testing approach. Its testing capabilities can be extended by test libraries implemented either with Python or Java, and users can create new higher-level keywords from existing ones using the same syntax that is used for creating test cases.

Karate DSL

Karate DSL

Combines API test-automation, mocks and performance-testing into a single, unified framework. The BDD syntax popularized by Cucumber is language-neutral, and easy for even non-programmers. Besides powerful JSON & XML assertions, you can run tests in parallel for speed - which is critical for HTTP API testing.

Cucumber

Cucumber

Cucumber is a tool that supports Behaviour-Driven Development (BDD) - a software development process that aims to enhance software quality and reduce maintenance costs.

TestCafe

TestCafe

It is a pure node.js end-to-end solution for testing web apps. It takes care of all the stages: starting browsers, running tests, gathering test results and generating reports.

Spock Framework

Spock Framework

It is a testing and specification framework for Java and Groovy applications. What makes it stand out from the crowd is its beautiful and highly expressive specification language. It is compatible with most IDEs, build tools, and continuous integration servers.

Selenide

Selenide

It is a library for writing concise, readable, boilerplate-free tests in Java using Selenium WebDriver.

Capybara

Capybara

Capybara helps you test web applications by simulating how a real user would interact with your app. It is agnostic about the driver running your tests and comes with Rack::Test and Selenium support built in. WebKit is supported through an external gem.

Detox

Detox

High velocity native mobile development requires us to adopt continuous integration workflows, which means our reliance on manual QA has to drop significantly. It tests your mobile app while it's running in a real device/simulator, interacting with it just like a real user.

Imagium

Imagium

Imagium provides AI based visual testing solution for various forms of testing. It makes the job easier for QA Automation, Mobile Testers, DevOps and Compliance teams. Imagium is easy to integrate with any programing language

react-testing-library

react-testing-library

It is a simple and complete React DOM testing utility that encourage good testing practices. It provides light utility functions on top of react-dom and react-dom/test-utils, in a way that encourages better testing practices.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana