CodeMirror vs Jenkins

Overview

Jenkins

Stacks59.2K

Followers50.4K

Votes2.2K

GitHub Stars24.6K

Forks9.2K

CodeMirror

Stacks747

Followers232

Votes15

CodeMirror vs Jenkins: What are the differences?

Introduction

When comparing CodeMirror and Jenkins, it is crucial to understand the key differences between the two platforms in order to make an informed decision about which one suits your specific needs.

Interface: CodeMirror is primarily a text editor component that can be embedded in web applications, providing syntax highlighting for various programming languages. On the other hand, Jenkins is a continuous integration and delivery tool used for automating the building, testing, and deployment of software projects. The interface of CodeMirror is focused on text editing capabilities, while Jenkins offers a comprehensive user interface for managing the CI/CD process.
Functionality: CodeMirror focuses on enhancing the code editing experience by providing features like syntax highlighting, code folding, and autocompletion. In contrast, Jenkins is designed to automate software delivery processes, including building code, running tests, and deploying applications. While CodeMirror improves the coding experience, Jenkins streamlines the development pipeline.
Integration: CodeMirror can be easily integrated into web applications to provide a code editing interface for users. Jenkins, on the other hand, integrates with various tools and services such as Git, Maven, and Docker to automate the different stages of software development. CodeMirror is typically integrated to enhance text editing capabilities, while Jenkins is integrated to facilitate the automation of the CI/CD pipeline.
Deployment Environment: CodeMirror is commonly used within web applications or code editing environments that require advanced text editing features. Jenkins, on the other hand, is deployed in server environments to manage the automation of software development processes. The deployment environment for CodeMirror is usually client-side, whereas Jenkins is deployed on a server or cloud infrastructure.
Target Audience: CodeMirror is targeted towards developers and web applications that require advanced code editing capabilities with syntax highlighting and autocompletion. Jenkins is aimed at software development teams looking to automate their CI/CD pipeline for increased efficiency and productivity. CodeMirror is more focused on enhancing the coding experience, while Jenkins addresses the automation needs of software development teams.
Cost: CodeMirror is an open-source project that can be used for free in both commercial and non-commercial applications. Jenkins is also open source and free to use, making it accessible for teams of all sizes. The cost of using CodeMirror is primarily associated with development and integration efforts, while Jenkins may incur costs for additional plugins or enterprise support.

In Summary, understanding the key differences between CodeMirror and Jenkins allows individuals and organizations to choose the appropriate tool based on their specific requirements and goals.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Jenkins, CodeMirror

Balaramesh

Apr 20, 2020

Needs adviceon

Azure Pipelines

.NET

Jenkins

We are currently using Azure Pipelines for continous integration. Our applications are developed witn .NET framework. But when we look at the online Jenkins is the most widely used tool for continous integration. Can you please give me the advice which one is best to use for my case Azure pipeline or jenkins.

663k views663k

Comments

StackShare

Apr 17, 2019

Needs advice

From a StackShare Community member: "Currently we use Travis CI and have optimized it as much as we can so our builds are fairly quick. Our boss is all about redundancy so we are looking for another solution to fall back on in case Travis goes down and/or jacks prices way up (they were recently acquired). Could someone recommend which CI we should go with and if they have time, an explanation of how they're different?"

530k views530k

Comments

Tatiana

Nov 16, 2019

Decided

Jenkins is a pretty flexible, complete tool. Especially I love the possibility to configure jobs as a code with Jenkins pipelines.

CircleCI is well suited for small projects where the main task is to run continuous integration as quickly as possible. Travis CI is recommended primarily for open-source projects that need to be tested in different environments.

And for something a bit larger I prefer to use Jenkins because it is possible to make serious system configuration thereby different plugins. In Jenkins, I can change almost anything. But if you want to start the CI chain as soon as possible, Jenkins may not be the right choice.

734k views734k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Jenkins	CodeMirror
In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.	CodeMirror is a JavaScript component that provides a code editor in the browser. When a mode is available for the language you are coding in, it will color your code, and optionally help with indentation.
Easy installation;Easy configuration;Change set support;Permanent links;RSS/E-mail/IM Integration;After-the-fact tagging;JUnit/TestNG test reporting;Distributed builds;File fingerprinting;Plugin Support	Support for over 60 languages out of the box;A powerful, composable language mode system;Autocompletion (XML);Code folding;Configurable keybindings;Vim, Emacs, and Sublime Text bindings;Search and replace interface;Bracket and tag matching;Support for split views;Linter integration;Mixing font sizes and styles;Various themes;Able to resize to fit content;Inline and block widgets;Programmable gutters;Making ranges of text styled, read-only, or atomic;Bi-directional text support
Statistics
GitHub Stars 24.6K	GitHub Stars -
GitHub Forks 9.2K	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 59.2K	Stacks 747
Followers 50.4K	Followers 232
Votes 2.2K	Votes 15
Pros & Cons
Pros 523 Hosted internally 469 Free open source 318 Great to build, deploy or launch anything async 243 Tons of integrations 211 Rich set of plugins with good documentation Cons 13 Workarounds needed for basic requirements 10 Groovy with cumbersome syntax 8 Plugins compatibility issues 7 Limited abilities with declarative pipelines 7 Lack of support	Pros 6 Integrable in your application 4 Better content manipulation methods 3 Easy Custom Mode 1 JavaScript based 1 Easy setup
Integrations
No integrations available	Google Chrome Sublime Text Opera Browser Safari Vim Emacs Firefox

What are some alternatives to Jenkins, CodeMirror?

Sublime Text

Sublime Text is available for OS X, Windows and Linux. One license is all you need to use Sublime Text on every computer you own, no matter what operating system it uses. Sublime Text uses a custom UI toolkit, optimized for speed and beauty, while taking advantage of native functionality on each platform.

Atom

At GitHub, we're building the text editor we've always wanted. A tool you can customize to do anything, but also use productively on the first day without ever touching a config file. Atom is modern, approachable, and hackable to the core. We can't wait to see what you build with it.

Vim

Vim is an advanced text editor that seeks to provide the power of the de-facto Unix editor 'Vi', with a more complete feature set. Vim is a highly configurable text editor built to enable efficient text editing. It is an improved version of the vi editor distributed with most UNIX systems. Vim is distributed free as charityware.

Visual Studio Code

Build and debug modern web and cloud applications. Code is free and available on your favorite platform - Linux, Mac OSX, and Windows.

Travis CI

Free for open source projects, our CI environment provides multiple runtimes (e.g. Node.js or PHP versions), data stores and so on. Because of this, hosting your project on travis-ci.com means you can effortlessly test your library or applications against multiple runtimes and data stores without even having all of them installed locally.

Codeship

Codeship runs your automated tests and configured deployment when you push to your repository. It takes care of managing and scaling the infrastructure so that you are able to test and release more frequently and get faster feedback for building the product your users need.

CircleCI

Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.

Notepad++

Notepad++ is a free (as in "free speech" and also as in "free beer") source code editor and Notepad replacement that supports several languages. Running in the MS Windows environment, its use is governed by GPL License.

Emacs

GNU Emacs is an extensible, customizable text editor—and more. At its core is an interpreter for Emacs Lisp, a dialect of the Lisp programming language with extensions to support text editing.

TeamCity

TeamCity is a user-friendly continuous integration (CI) server for professional developers, build engineers, and DevOps. It is trivial to setup and absolutely free for small teams and open source projects.

Related Comparisons

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana

CodeMirror vs Jenkins: What are the differences?

Introduction

When comparing CodeMirror and Jenkins, it is crucial to understand the key differences between the two platforms in order to make an informed decision about which one suits your specific needs.

Interface: CodeMirror is primarily a text editor component that can be embedded in web applications, providing syntax highlighting for various programming languages. On the other hand, Jenkins is a continuous integration and delivery tool used for automating the building, testing, and deployment of software projects. The interface of CodeMirror is focused on text editing capabilities, while Jenkins offers a comprehensive user interface for managing the CI/CD process.
Functionality: CodeMirror focuses on enhancing the code editing experience by providing features like syntax highlighting, code folding, and autocompletion. In contrast, Jenkins is designed to automate software delivery processes, including building code, running tests, and deploying applications. While CodeMirror improves the coding experience, Jenkins streamlines the development pipeline.
Integration: CodeMirror can be easily integrated into web applications to provide a code editing interface for users. Jenkins, on the other hand, integrates with various tools and services such as Git, Maven, and Docker to automate the different stages of software development. CodeMirror is typically integrated to enhance text editing capabilities, while Jenkins is integrated to facilitate the automation of the CI/CD pipeline.
Deployment Environment: CodeMirror is commonly used within web applications or code editing environments that require advanced text editing features. Jenkins, on the other hand, is deployed in server environments to manage the automation of software development processes. The deployment environment for CodeMirror is usually client-side, whereas Jenkins is deployed on a server or cloud infrastructure.
Target Audience: CodeMirror is targeted towards developers and web applications that require advanced code editing capabilities with syntax highlighting and autocompletion. Jenkins is aimed at software development teams looking to automate their CI/CD pipeline for increased efficiency and productivity. CodeMirror is more focused on enhancing the coding experience, while Jenkins addresses the automation needs of software development teams.
Cost: CodeMirror is an open-source project that can be used for free in both commercial and non-commercial applications. Jenkins is also open source and free to use, making it accessible for teams of all sizes. The cost of using CodeMirror is primarily associated with development and integration efforts, while Jenkins may incur costs for additional plugins or enterprise support.

In Summary, understanding the key differences between CodeMirror and Jenkins allows individuals and organizations to choose the appropriate tool based on their specific requirements and goals.