StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Code Collaboration
  4. Text Editor
  5. CodeMirror vs Prism

CodeMirror vs Prism

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

CodeMirror
CodeMirror
Stacks747
Followers232
Votes15
Prism
Prism
Stacks1.1K
Followers58
Votes0
GitHub Stars12.8K
Forks1.4K

CodeMirror vs Prism: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this Markdown, we will compare the key differences between CodeMirror and Prism, two popular code syntax highlighters.

  1. 1. Language Support: CodeMirror offers support for a wide range of programming languages, including languages like Python, Java, HTML, CSS, and JavaScript, among others. On the other hand, Prism focuses more on web development languages such as HTML, CSS, and JavaScript, with limited support for other programming languages. Therefore, CodeMirror provides a broader language coverage compared to Prism.

  2. 2. Extensibility: CodeMirror provides a highly extensible framework that allows developers to easily create custom language modes and add functionalities. This enables developers to tailor CodeMirror to their specific needs by adding support for additional languages or customizing the behavior of existing languages. In contrast, Prism has a more limited extensibility compared to CodeMirror. It offers some flexibility through plugins, but the level of customization and extensibility is not as extensive as in CodeMirror.

  3. 3. Code Editing Features: CodeMirror focuses on providing a rich set of code editing features, such as syntax highlighting, code folding, autocomplete, linting, and bracket matching. It offers a comprehensive set of tools that enhance the development experience for programmers. On the other hand, Prism primarily focuses on syntax highlighting, providing lightweight and efficient code coloring for web development languages. While Prism provides some basic code editing features, it does not offer the same level of functionality as CodeMirror.

  4. 4. Bundle Size: CodeMirror has a larger bundle size compared to Prism. CodeMirror's extensive set of features and language support results in a larger codebase, which may affect the initial loading time of web pages. Prism, on the other hand, is designed to be lightweight and offers a smaller bundle size, making it more suitable for projects where minimizing the network payload is important.

  5. 5. Browser Compatibility: CodeMirror has better browser compatibility compared to Prism. It supports a wide range of browsers, including older versions and less common browsers. This makes CodeMirror a more robust choice for projects with specific browser requirements. Prism, while compatible with popular browsers, may have limited support for older or less common browsers.

  6. 6. Project Focus: CodeMirror is a more mature and widely-used project, with a large community of contributors and a well-established ecosystem. It has been extensively tested and used in various projects. Prism, on the other hand, is a newer project that focuses on specific use cases, mainly web development syntax highlighting. While Prism is growing in popularity, it may not have the same level of community support and resources as CodeMirror.

In summary, CodeMirror offers broader language support, higher extensibility, richer code editing features, larger bundle size, better browser compatibility, and has a more established community compared to Prism. However, Prism provides a lightweight and efficient solution for web development syntax highlighting.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

CodeMirror
CodeMirror
Prism
Prism

CodeMirror is a JavaScript component that provides a code editor in the browser. When a mode is available for the language you are coding in, it will color your code, and optionally help with indentation.

It is a lightweight, beautiful and extensible syntax highlighter, built with modern web standards in mind. It’s used in thousands of websites, including some of those you visit daily.

Support for over 60 languages out of the box;A powerful, composable language mode system;Autocompletion (XML);Code folding;Configurable keybindings;Vim, Emacs, and Sublime Text bindings;Search and replace interface;Bracket and tag matching;Support for split views;Linter integration;Mixing font sizes and styles;Various themes;Able to resize to fit content;Inline and block widgets;Programmable gutters;Making ranges of text styled, read-only, or atomic;Bi-directional text support
Dead simple;Intuitive;Light as a feather;Blazing fast
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
12.8K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
1.4K
Stacks
747
Stacks
1.1K
Followers
232
Followers
58
Votes
15
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 6
    Integrable in your application
  • 4
    Better content manipulation methods
  • 3
    Easy Custom Mode
  • 1
    JavaScript based
  • 1
    Easy setup
No community feedback yet
Integrations
Google Chrome
Google Chrome
Sublime Text
Sublime Text
Opera Browser
Opera Browser
Safari
Safari
Vim
Vim
Emacs
Emacs
Firefox
Firefox
Drupal
Drupal
React
React
WordPress
WordPress
Angular
Angular
Typo3
Typo3
HTML5
HTML5

What are some alternatives to CodeMirror, Prism?

Sublime Text

Sublime Text

Sublime Text is available for OS X, Windows and Linux. One license is all you need to use Sublime Text on every computer you own, no matter what operating system it uses. Sublime Text uses a custom UI toolkit, optimized for speed and beauty, while taking advantage of native functionality on each platform.

Atom

Atom

At GitHub, we're building the text editor we've always wanted. A tool you can customize to do anything, but also use productively on the first day without ever touching a config file. Atom is modern, approachable, and hackable to the core. We can't wait to see what you build with it.

Vim

Vim

Vim is an advanced text editor that seeks to provide the power of the de-facto Unix editor 'Vi', with a more complete feature set. Vim is a highly configurable text editor built to enable efficient text editing. It is an improved version of the vi editor distributed with most UNIX systems. Vim is distributed free as charityware.

Visual Studio Code

Visual Studio Code

Build and debug modern web and cloud applications. Code is free and available on your favorite platform - Linux, Mac OSX, and Windows.

Notepad++

Notepad++

Notepad++ is a free (as in "free speech" and also as in "free beer") source code editor and Notepad replacement that supports several languages. Running in the MS Windows environment, its use is governed by GPL License.

Emacs

Emacs

GNU Emacs is an extensible, customizable text editor—and more. At its core is an interpreter for Emacs Lisp, a dialect of the Lisp programming language with extensions to support text editing.

Underscore

Underscore

A JavaScript library that provides a whole mess of useful functional programming helpers without extending any built-in objects.

Brackets

Brackets

With focused visual tools and preprocessor support, it is a modern text editor that makes it easy to design in the browser.

Neovim

Neovim

Neovim is a project that seeks to aggressively refactor Vim in order to: simplify maintenance and encourage contributions, split the work between multiple developers, enable the implementation of new/modern user interfaces without any modifications to the core source, and improve extensibility with a new plugin architecture.

Deno

Deno

It is a secure runtime for JavaScript and TypeScript built with V8, Rust, and Tokio.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot