StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Code Collaboration
  4. Text Editor
  5. CodeSandbox vs JSFiddle

CodeSandbox vs JSFiddle

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

JSFiddle
JSFiddle
Stacks44
Followers81
Votes0
CodeSandbox
CodeSandbox
Stacks101
Followers289
Votes25

CodeSandbox vs JSFiddle: What are the differences?

Introduction: In this Markdown code, we will discuss the key differences between CodeSandbox and JSFiddle, two popular online code editors for front-end web development. We will provide specific details about each difference in a concise manner.

  1. Collaboration Features: CodeSandbox provides seamless collaboration features such as live collaboration and real-time code editing. It allows multiple users to work on the same project simultaneously, making it ideal for pair programming or team projects. On the other hand, JSFiddle lacks built-in collaboration features, making it more suitable for individual developers.

  2. Environment Support: CodeSandbox supports a wider range of environments, including React, Vue.js, Angular, and many more. It provides a comprehensive set of pre-configured templates and packages for various frameworks, which significantly speeds up the development process. In contrast, JSFiddle mainly focuses on JavaScript, HTML, and CSS, providing less extensive support for other frameworks.

  3. Browser Compatibility Testing: CodeSandbox allows developers to test their applications on different browsers directly within the editor. It provides a convenient way to check cross-browser compatibility and identify any potential issues. However, JSFiddle does not offer integrated browser testing, making it less suitable for comprehensive compatibility testing.

  4. Build and Deployment Features: CodeSandbox offers advanced build and deployment features, allowing developers to build and publish their projects easily. It provides various options to build optimized production-ready code, generate static sites, or deploy applications to popular hosting platforms. Conversely, JSFiddle lacks these build and deployment functionalities, limiting its usage to primarily prototyping and testing.

  5. Community and Sharing: CodeSandbox has a large and active community of developers who share their projects, templates, and packages. It provides a platform for developers to showcase their work, collaborate, and learn from each other. JSFiddle also has a community, but it is relatively smaller and less active compared to CodeSandbox.

  6. Documentation and Learning Resources: CodeSandbox offers comprehensive documentation and learning resources to help developers get started and learn new concepts. It provides tutorials, guides, and examples to assist users in understanding its features and making the most out of the editor. JSFiddle, while providing some documentation, has fewer learning resources available.

In summary, the key differences between CodeSandbox and JSFiddle are that CodeSandbox offers collaboration features, supports a wider range of environments, includes browser compatibility testing, provides build and deployment features, has a larger community and sharing capabilities, and offers more extensive documentation and learning resources.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

JSFiddle
JSFiddle
CodeSandbox
CodeSandbox

It is an online community for testing and showcasing user-created and collaborational HTML, CSS and JavaScript code snippets, known as 'fiddles'. It allows for simulated AJAX calls.

CodeSandbox allows developers to simply go to a URL in their browser to start building. This not only makes it easier to get started, it also makes it easier to share. You can just share your created work by sharing the URL, others can then (without downloading) further develop on these sandboxes.

Saving and Forking code; GitHub Integration; Live code collaboration; Bug reporting (test-case) for GitHub Issues
-
Statistics
Stacks
44
Stacks
101
Followers
81
Followers
289
Votes
0
Votes
25
Pros & Cons
Cons
  • 2
    Can't login with third-party app account
Pros
  • 9
    Awesome way to fun kickstart your ReactJS apps
  • 7
    Online vs-code editor look and feel to start react
  • 5
    Is open-source
  • 4
    Easiest way to showcase
Cons
  • 4
    250 module limit
  • 1
    Hard to use the console
Integrations
CSS 3
CSS 3
React
React
JavaScript
JavaScript
Vue.js
Vue.js
PostCSS
PostCSS
Preact
Preact
HAML
HAML
Sass
Sass
HTML5
HTML5
Stylelint
Stylelint
React
React
JavaScript
JavaScript

What are some alternatives to JSFiddle, CodeSandbox?

Sublime Text

Sublime Text

Sublime Text is available for OS X, Windows and Linux. One license is all you need to use Sublime Text on every computer you own, no matter what operating system it uses. Sublime Text uses a custom UI toolkit, optimized for speed and beauty, while taking advantage of native functionality on each platform.

Atom

Atom

At GitHub, we're building the text editor we've always wanted. A tool you can customize to do anything, but also use productively on the first day without ever touching a config file. Atom is modern, approachable, and hackable to the core. We can't wait to see what you build with it.

Vim

Vim

Vim is an advanced text editor that seeks to provide the power of the de-facto Unix editor 'Vi', with a more complete feature set. Vim is a highly configurable text editor built to enable efficient text editing. It is an improved version of the vi editor distributed with most UNIX systems. Vim is distributed free as charityware.

Visual Studio Code

Visual Studio Code

Build and debug modern web and cloud applications. Code is free and available on your favorite platform - Linux, Mac OSX, and Windows.

Red Hat Codeready Workspaces

Red Hat Codeready Workspaces

Built on the open Eclipse Che project, Red Hat CodeReady Workspaces provides developer workspaces, which include all the tools and the dependencies that are needed to code, build, test, run, and debug applications.

AWS Cloud9

AWS Cloud9

Cloud9 provides a development environment in the cloud. Cloud9 enables developers to get started with coding immediately with pre-setup environments called workspaces, collaborate with their peers with collaborative coding features, and build web apps with features like live preview and browser compatibility testing. It supports more than 40 languages, with class A support for PHP, Ruby, Python, JavaScript/Node.js, and Go.

Notepad++

Notepad++

Notepad++ is a free (as in "free speech" and also as in "free beer") source code editor and Notepad replacement that supports several languages. Running in the MS Windows environment, its use is governed by GPL License.

Emacs

Emacs

GNU Emacs is an extensible, customizable text editor—and more. At its core is an interpreter for Emacs Lisp, a dialect of the Lisp programming language with extensions to support text editing.

Brackets

Brackets

With focused visual tools and preprocessor support, it is a modern text editor that makes it easy to design in the browser.

Koding

Koding

Koding is a feature rich cloud-based development environment complete with free VMs, an attractive IDE & sudo level terminal access!

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana