StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Build Automation
  4. Package Managers
  5. Composer vs SDKMAN

Composer vs SDKMAN

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Composer
Composer
Stacks1.2K
Followers559
Votes13
GitHub Stars29.2K
Forks4.7K
SDKMAN
SDKMAN
Stacks19
Followers31
Votes1
GitHub Stars6.5K
Forks637

Composer vs SDKMAN: What are the differences?

Introduction

Composer and SDKMAN are two commonly used tools in the software development world. While both are essential for managing dependencies and libraries, they have distinct differences that set them apart from each other.

  1. Installation Process: One key difference between Composer and SDKMAN is the installation process. Composer is a dependency manager for PHP that is typically installed on a per-project basis using PHP's package management system. On the other hand, SDKMAN is a tool for managing software development kits and tools across multiple projects or environments and is installed globally on your system.

  2. Supported Languages and Technologies: Another significant difference is the scope of technologies each tool supports. Composer is primarily used for managing PHP dependencies within a project, making it ideal for PHP developers. SDKMAN, on the other hand, supports a wide range of languages and tools, including Java, Groovy, Scala, Kotlin, and more, catering to a broader audience of developers.

  3. Functionality: In terms of functionality, Composer is focused on dependency management specifically for PHP projects. It helps developers easily manage project dependencies, autoloaders, and scripts. In contrast, SDKMAN offers a broader set of functions, including managing different versions of software development kits and tools, switching between versions, and facilitating the installation of new tools.

  4. Version Control: When it comes to version control, Composer relies on the composer.json file within the project directory to define dependencies and manage versions. SDKMAN, on the other hand, uses a centralized system to manage versions and installations across multiple projects, making it easier to maintain consistency in tool versions across different projects.

  5. Community and Support: Composer benefits from a large and active PHP community, providing extensive documentation, support, and a vast library of packages to choose from. SDKMAN also has a supportive community; however, its broader scope means that it may not have the same level of language-specific support as Composer for PHP-related issues.

  6. Use Cases: The use cases for Composer and SDKMAN are also different based on their primary functionalities. Composer is best suited for PHP developers who need to manage dependencies within PHP projects, while SDKMAN is more versatile and caters to developers working with multiple languages and tools who need to manage various SDKs and development environments simultaneously.

In Summary, Composer and SDKMAN are both valuable tools for managing dependencies and development environments, with Composer being more PHP-focused and project-specific, while SDKMAN offers broader language and tool support for managing multiple projects and environments effortlessly.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Composer
Composer
SDKMAN
SDKMAN

It is a tool for dependency management in PHP. It allows you to declare the libraries your project depends on and it will manage (install/update) them for you.

It provides a convenient way to install, switch, list and remove candidates. Using it, you can now manage parallel versions of multiple SDKs easily on any Unix-like operating system.

Locally; Globally
Multi-platform; Java all the way down; APIs; Lightweight
Statistics
GitHub Stars
29.2K
GitHub Stars
6.5K
GitHub Forks
4.7K
GitHub Forks
637
Stacks
1.2K
Stacks
19
Followers
559
Followers
31
Votes
13
Votes
1
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 7
    Must have dependency manager for PHP
  • 3
    Centralized autoload.php
  • 3
    Large number of libraries
Pros
  • 1
    Lightweight, fast
Integrations
PhpStorm
PhpStorm
Linux
Linux
JavaScript
JavaScript
PHP
PHP
PuPHPet
PuPHPet
MySQL
MySQL
ReactPHP
ReactPHP
macOS
macOS
Akutan
Akutan
GNU Bash
GNU Bash
Ruby
Ruby
cURL
cURL

What are some alternatives to Composer, SDKMAN?

Meteor

Meteor

A Meteor application is a mix of JavaScript that runs inside a client web browser, JavaScript that runs on the Meteor server inside a Node.js container, and all the supporting HTML fragments, CSS rules, and static assets.

Bower

Bower

Bower is a package manager for the web. It offers a generic, unopinionated solution to the problem of front-end package management, while exposing the package dependency model via an API that can be consumed by a more opinionated build stack. There are no system wide dependencies, no dependencies are shared between different apps, and the dependency tree is flat.

Elm

Elm

Writing HTML apps is super easy with elm-lang/html. Not only does it render extremely fast, it also quietly guides you towards well-architected code.

Julia

Julia

Julia is a high-level, high-performance dynamic programming language for technical computing, with syntax that is familiar to users of other technical computing environments. It provides a sophisticated compiler, distributed parallel execution, numerical accuracy, and an extensive mathematical function library.

Racket

Racket

It is a general-purpose, multi-paradigm programming language based on the Scheme dialect of Lisp. It is designed to be a platform for programming language design and implementation. It is also used for scripting, computer science education, and research.

PureScript

PureScript

A small strongly typed programming language with expressive types that compiles to JavaScript, written in and inspired by Haskell.

pnpm

pnpm

It uses hard links and symlinks to save one version of a module only ever once on a disk. When using npm or Yarn for example, if you have 100 projects using the same version of lodash, you will have 100 copies of lodash on disk. With pnpm, lodash will be saved in a single place on the disk and a hard link will put it into the node_modules where it should be installed.

Bun

Bun

Develop, test, run, and bundle JavaScript & TypeScript projects—all with Bun. Bun is an all-in-one JavaScript runtime & toolkit designed for speed, complete with a bundler, test runner, and Node.js-compatible package manager.

Homebrew

Homebrew

Homebrew installs the stuff you need that Apple didn’t. Homebrew installs packages to their own directory and then symlinks their files into /usr/local.

fpm

fpm

It helps you build packages quickly and easily (Packages like RPM and DEB formats).

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana