StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Container Registry
  4. Container Tools
  5. containerd vs kaniko

containerd vs kaniko

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

kaniko
kaniko
Stacks44
Followers79
Votes4
GitHub Stars15.7K
Forks1.5K
containerd
containerd
Stacks81
Followers140
Votes5

containerd vs kaniko: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this article, we will discuss the key differences between containerd and kaniko, two popular containerization tools used in the software development and deployment process. Containerd and kaniko both offer container building capabilities but have some differentiation that sets them apart.

  1. Containerd: Containerd is a runtime-focused container engine that provides a reliable and scalable platform for running containers in production environments. It is designed to be used as an underlying runtime for higher-level container platforms, such as Docker and Kubernetes. Containerd aims to offer a minimalistic and stable environment for distributing container images, managing container lifecycle, and executing container processes. It focuses more on the runtime aspect of container management rather than the build process.

  2. Kaniko: Kaniko, on the other hand, is a build-focused container image builder that is particularly useful for building container images in environments where Docker daemon access is restricted or unavailable. Unlike traditional container image building tools, kaniko does not require access to a Docker daemon. It performs the image build process entirely within a container, making it capable of building images using only a container runtime environment. Kaniko enables developers to build container images from a Dockerfile without needing privileged access to the host system or requiring Docker daemon interaction.

  3. Containerd's focus on runtime: Containerd primarily focuses on providing a robust and efficient runtime environment for containers, which includes functionalities related to image distribution, container execution, and resource management. It excels in managing the lifecycle and execution of containers while relying on external tools or building processes.

  4. Kaniko's build-centric approach: Kaniko, on the other hand, concentrates on the image building process itself. It aims to simplify and secure the image build process by performing it within a containerized environment. Kaniko doesn't require direct interaction with the host system or the Docker daemon, making it useful in scenarios where such access is restricted or undesired.

  5. Containerd's integration with higher-level container platforms: Containerd is often used as an underlying runtime by container platforms like Docker and Kubernetes. It provides the necessary runtime capabilities to these platforms, enabling them to manage container images and execute containerized applications efficiently. Containerd serves as a foundational component for building higher-level container management systems.

  6. Kaniko's independence from Docker daemon and privileged access: Kaniko's distinctive feature is its ability to build container images within a container itself, avoiding the need for direct Docker daemon access or host system privileges. This makes it a powerful tool for building containers in environments where the standard Docker build process is not feasible or restricted due to security concerns.

In Summary, containerd focuses on container runtime management and integration with higher-level platforms, while kaniko provides an independent container image building capability without relying on the Docker daemon or requiring privileged access to the host system.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

kaniko
kaniko
containerd
containerd

A tool to build container images from a Dockerfile, inside a container or Kubernetes cluster. kaniko doesn't depend on a Docker daemon and executes each command within a Dockerfile completely in userspace. This enables building container images in environments that can't easily or securely run a Docker daemon, such as a standard Kubernetes cluster.

An industry-standard container runtime with an emphasis on simplicity, robustness, and portability

Build container images in environments that can't easily or securely run a Docker daemon, such as a standard Kubernetes cluster
OCI Image Spec support; OCI Runtime Spec support (aka runC); Image push and pull support; Container runtime and lifecycle support; Network primitives for creation, modification, and deletion of interfaces; Multi-tenant supported with CAS storage for global images; Management of network namespaces containers to join existing namespaces
Statistics
GitHub Stars
15.7K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
1.5K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
44
Stacks
81
Followers
79
Followers
140
Votes
4
Votes
5
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 3
    No need for docker demon
  • 1
    Automation using jules
Cons
  • 1
    Slow compared to docker
Pros
  • 3
    No Need for docker shim
  • 2
    Supports Kubernetes version greater than 1.21
  • 0
    No kubernetes support after 1.22
  • 0
    Needs docker shim to work on kubernetes
Integrations
Kubernetes
Kubernetes
Docker
Docker
Google Cloud Container Builder
Google Cloud Container Builder
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to kaniko, containerd?

Kubernetes

Kubernetes

Kubernetes is an open source orchestration system for Docker containers. It handles scheduling onto nodes in a compute cluster and actively manages workloads to ensure that their state matches the users declared intentions.

Rancher

Rancher

Rancher is an open source container management platform that includes full distributions of Kubernetes, Apache Mesos and Docker Swarm, and makes it simple to operate container clusters on any cloud or infrastructure platform.

Docker Compose

Docker Compose

With Compose, you define a multi-container application in a single file, then spin your application up in a single command which does everything that needs to be done to get it running.

Docker Swarm

Docker Swarm

Swarm serves the standard Docker API, so any tool which already communicates with a Docker daemon can use Swarm to transparently scale to multiple hosts: Dokku, Compose, Krane, Deis, DockerUI, Shipyard, Drone, Jenkins... and, of course, the Docker client itself.

Tutum

Tutum

Tutum lets developers easily manage and run lightweight, portable, self-sufficient containers from any application. AWS-like control, Heroku-like ease. The same container that a developer builds and tests on a laptop can run at scale in Tutum.

Portainer

Portainer

It is a universal container management tool. It works with Kubernetes, Docker, Docker Swarm and Azure ACI. It allows you to manage containers without needing to know platform-specific code.

Codefresh

Codefresh

Automate and parallelize testing. Codefresh allows teams to spin up on-demand compositions to run unit and integration tests as part of the continuous integration process. Jenkins integration allows more complex pipelines.

CAST.AI

CAST.AI

It is an AI-driven cloud optimization platform for Kubernetes. Instantly cut your cloud bill, prevent downtime, and 10X the power of DevOps.

k3s

k3s

Certified Kubernetes distribution designed for production workloads in unattended, resource-constrained, remote locations or inside IoT appliances. Supports something as small as a Raspberry Pi or as large as an AWS a1.4xlarge 32GiB server.

Flocker

Flocker

Flocker is a data volume manager and multi-host Docker cluster management tool. With it you can control your data using the same tools you use for your stateless applications. This means that you can run your databases, queues and key-value stores in Docker and move them around as easily as the rest of your app.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana