StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Container Registry
  4. Virtual Machine Platforms And Containers
  5. LXC vs containerd

LXC vs containerd

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

LXC
LXC
Stacks116
Followers223
Votes19
GitHub Stars5.0K
Forks1.2K
containerd
containerd
Stacks81
Followers140
Votes5

LXC vs containerd: What are the differences?

Key Differences Between LXC and containerd

Introduction

LXC (Linux Containers) and containerd are both tools used in containerization, but they have some key differences that set them apart. Understanding these differences can help in choosing the right tool for specific use cases. Below are the six main differences between LXC and containerd.

  1. Architecture: LXC is an operating system-level virtualization method that uses Linux kernel features to run multiple isolated container instances on a single host. It provides a more complete container runtime environment compared to containerd, which is a container runtime interface that focuses on managing container execution and low-level container runtime operations.

  2. Scope: LXC provides a higher level of control and functionality as it includes the full user-space and command-line interface for managing containers. On the other hand, containerd is designed to be a lightweight runtime focused on executing containers using the container runtime interface (CRI) standards and provides a more minimalistic approach.

  3. Integration: LXC is tightly integrated with the Linux kernel and utilizes the Linux features and tools extensively. It leverages kernel namespaces, capabilities, and control groups to provide complete isolation. Conversely, containerd is designed to work with various container runtimes, including Docker and Kubernetes, and provides a standardized API for container execution, image management, and more.

  4. Usage: LXC is commonly used for running full-fledged Linux distributions within containers, allowing users to create and manage lightweight system containers. It provides a more traditional virtualization experience with a broad range of features. On the other hand, containerd is often used as a backend container runtime for higher-level container orchestration platforms like Docker and Kubernetes. It focuses on executing container tasks efficiently.

  5. Management: LXC comes with its own command-line tools and utilities for managing containers, configuring networking, and managing storage. It provides a comprehensive set of features to control the container environment. In contrast, containerd is a lower-level runtime that requires higher-level tools like Docker or Kubernetes to manage container lifecycles, networking, and other infrastructure-related aspects.

  6. Extensibility: LXC allows users to easily extend its functionalities by creating custom templates, plugins, and hooks. It provides flexibility to modify and add features as needed. On the other hand, containerd is designed to be more modular and focused, aiming for simpler extensibility and compatibility with various container runtimes and orchestrators.

In Summary, LXC is a full-fledged containerization solution that provides a comprehensive user-space environment, while containerd is a minimalistic container runtime interface that focuses on executing containers efficiently and works well with higher-level container orchestration platforms like Docker and Kubernetes.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

LXC
LXC
containerd
containerd

LXC is a userspace interface for the Linux kernel containment features. Through a powerful API and simple tools, it lets Linux users easily create and manage system or application containers.

An industry-standard container runtime with an emphasis on simplicity, robustness, and portability

-
OCI Image Spec support; OCI Runtime Spec support (aka runC); Image push and pull support; Container runtime and lifecycle support; Network primitives for creation, modification, and deletion of interfaces; Multi-tenant supported with CAS storage for global images; Management of network namespaces containers to join existing namespaces
Statistics
GitHub Stars
5.0K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
1.2K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
116
Stacks
81
Followers
223
Followers
140
Votes
19
Votes
5
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 5
    Easy to use
  • 4
    Lightweight
  • 3
    Good security
  • 3
    Simple and powerful
  • 2
    LGPL
Pros
  • 3
    No Need for docker shim
  • 2
    Supports Kubernetes version greater than 1.21
  • 0
    No kubernetes support after 1.22
  • 0
    Needs docker shim to work on kubernetes

What are some alternatives to LXC, containerd?

Docker

Docker

The Docker Platform is the industry-leading container platform for continuous, high-velocity innovation, enabling organizations to seamlessly build and share any application — from legacy to what comes next — and securely run them anywhere

Kubernetes

Kubernetes

Kubernetes is an open source orchestration system for Docker containers. It handles scheduling onto nodes in a compute cluster and actively manages workloads to ensure that their state matches the users declared intentions.

Rancher

Rancher

Rancher is an open source container management platform that includes full distributions of Kubernetes, Apache Mesos and Docker Swarm, and makes it simple to operate container clusters on any cloud or infrastructure platform.

Docker Compose

Docker Compose

With Compose, you define a multi-container application in a single file, then spin your application up in a single command which does everything that needs to be done to get it running.

Docker Swarm

Docker Swarm

Swarm serves the standard Docker API, so any tool which already communicates with a Docker daemon can use Swarm to transparently scale to multiple hosts: Dokku, Compose, Krane, Deis, DockerUI, Shipyard, Drone, Jenkins... and, of course, the Docker client itself.

Tutum

Tutum

Tutum lets developers easily manage and run lightweight, portable, self-sufficient containers from any application. AWS-like control, Heroku-like ease. The same container that a developer builds and tests on a laptop can run at scale in Tutum.

Portainer

Portainer

It is a universal container management tool. It works with Kubernetes, Docker, Docker Swarm and Azure ACI. It allows you to manage containers without needing to know platform-specific code.

LXD

LXD

LXD isn't a rewrite of LXC, in fact it's building on top of LXC to provide a new, better user experience. Under the hood, LXD uses LXC through liblxc and its Go binding to create and manage the containers. It's basically an alternative to LXC's tools and distribution template system with the added features that come from being controllable over the network.

Codefresh

Codefresh

Automate and parallelize testing. Codefresh allows teams to spin up on-demand compositions to run unit and integration tests as part of the continuous integration process. Jenkins integration allows more complex pipelines.

CAST.AI

CAST.AI

It is an AI-driven cloud optimization platform for Kubernetes. Instantly cut your cloud bill, prevent downtime, and 10X the power of DevOps.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana