StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Container Registry
  4. Container Tools
  5. containerd vs minikube

containerd vs minikube

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

minikube
minikube
Stacks110
Followers262
Votes3
GitHub Stars31.1K
Forks5.1K
containerd
containerd
Stacks81
Followers140
Votes5

containerd vs minikube: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this article, we will discuss the key differences between containerd and minikube. Both containerd and minikube are popular tools used in the containerization ecosystem, but they have different purposes and functionalities.

  1. Containerd: Containerd is a high-performance container runtime that manages the lifecycle of containers within a cluster. It provides a standardized API for container execution, image management, and distribution. Containerd is designed to be lightweight and fully compatible with the Open Container Initiative (OCI) standards. It is used as a backend container runtime by various container orchestration platforms like Kubernetes.

  2. Minikube: Minikube is a tool that allows you to run a single-node Kubernetes cluster on your local machine. It is primarily used for development and testing purposes. Minikube provides a simple way to experience and experiment with Kubernetes without the need for a full-scale production cluster. It comes with built-in support for different hypervisors and allows you to easily deploy and manage applications on a local Kubernetes environment.

  3. Difference 1: Container Runtime vs. Kubernetes Cluster: The main difference between containerd and minikube is their primary functions. While containerd is focused on being a container runtime, responsible for the lifecycle management of containers within a cluster, minikube is designed to create and manage a local single-node Kubernetes cluster.

  4. Difference 2: Scope and Complexity: Containerd is a lower-level tool that is used as a runtime component by higher-level container orchestration platforms like Kubernetes. It provides a more granular level of control and advanced management features for containers. On the other hand, minikube provides a simplified and beginner-friendly way to set up a local Kubernetes environment with a reduced scope and complexity.

  5. Difference 3: Production vs. Development: Containerd is typically used in production environments, either as a standalone container runtime or as part of a container orchestration platform. It focuses on reliability, performance, and advanced container management features required for production workloads. Minikube, on the other hand, is primarily used for development and testing purposes, where the emphasis is on simplicity, ease of use, and quick deployment of applications for local development.

  6. Difference 4: Scalability and Flexibility: Containerd is designed to be scalable and can handle large-scale production workloads across multiple nodes in a cluster. It provides features like container orchestration, networking, load balancing, and service discovery, which are essential for deploying applications at scale. Minikube, being a single-node Kubernetes cluster, has limitations in terms of scalability and flexibility. It is tailored for individual development and testing scenarios where a smaller environment suffices.

In summary, containerd is a container runtime focused on managing container lifecycles within a cluster, while minikube is a tool used to set up a local Kubernetes environment for development and testing purposes. Containerd is more suitable for production workloads, offering advanced container management features, scalability, and compatibility with container orchestration platforms. Minikube, on the other hand, provides a simplified and beginner-friendly experience for local Kubernetes development and is not intended for large-scale production deployments.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

minikube
minikube
containerd
containerd

It implements a local Kubernetes cluster on macOS, Linux, and Windows. Its goal is to be the tool for local Kubernetes application development and to support all Kubernetes features that fit.

An industry-standard container runtime with an emphasis on simplicity, robustness, and portability

Local Kubernetes; LoadBalancer; Multi-cluster
OCI Image Spec support; OCI Runtime Spec support (aka runC); Image push and pull support; Container runtime and lifecycle support; Network primitives for creation, modification, and deletion of interfaces; Multi-tenant supported with CAS storage for global images; Management of network namespaces containers to join existing namespaces
Statistics
GitHub Stars
31.1K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
5.1K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
110
Stacks
81
Followers
262
Followers
140
Votes
3
Votes
5
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 1
    Let's me test k8s config locally
  • 1
    Easy setup
  • 1
    Can use same yaml config I'll use for prod deployment
Pros
  • 3
    No Need for docker shim
  • 2
    Supports Kubernetes version greater than 1.21
  • 0
    No kubernetes support after 1.22
  • 0
    Needs docker shim to work on kubernetes
Integrations
Windows
Windows
Linux
Linux
macOS
macOS
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to minikube, containerd?

Kubernetes

Kubernetes

Kubernetes is an open source orchestration system for Docker containers. It handles scheduling onto nodes in a compute cluster and actively manages workloads to ensure that their state matches the users declared intentions.

Rancher

Rancher

Rancher is an open source container management platform that includes full distributions of Kubernetes, Apache Mesos and Docker Swarm, and makes it simple to operate container clusters on any cloud or infrastructure platform.

Docker Compose

Docker Compose

With Compose, you define a multi-container application in a single file, then spin your application up in a single command which does everything that needs to be done to get it running.

Docker Swarm

Docker Swarm

Swarm serves the standard Docker API, so any tool which already communicates with a Docker daemon can use Swarm to transparently scale to multiple hosts: Dokku, Compose, Krane, Deis, DockerUI, Shipyard, Drone, Jenkins... and, of course, the Docker client itself.

Tutum

Tutum

Tutum lets developers easily manage and run lightweight, portable, self-sufficient containers from any application. AWS-like control, Heroku-like ease. The same container that a developer builds and tests on a laptop can run at scale in Tutum.

Portainer

Portainer

It is a universal container management tool. It works with Kubernetes, Docker, Docker Swarm and Azure ACI. It allows you to manage containers without needing to know platform-specific code.

Codefresh

Codefresh

Automate and parallelize testing. Codefresh allows teams to spin up on-demand compositions to run unit and integration tests as part of the continuous integration process. Jenkins integration allows more complex pipelines.

CAST.AI

CAST.AI

It is an AI-driven cloud optimization platform for Kubernetes. Instantly cut your cloud bill, prevent downtime, and 10X the power of DevOps.

k3s

k3s

Certified Kubernetes distribution designed for production workloads in unattended, resource-constrained, remote locations or inside IoT appliances. Supports something as small as a Raspberry Pi or as large as an AWS a1.4xlarge 32GiB server.

Flocker

Flocker

Flocker is a data volume manager and multi-host Docker cluster management tool. With it you can control your data using the same tools you use for your stateless applications. This means that you can run your databases, queues and key-value stores in Docker and move them around as easily as the rest of your app.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana