Cornerstone 4 vs GitBucket

Overview

GitBucket

Stacks79

Followers177

Votes36

Cornerstone 4

Stacks0

Followers1

Votes0

Cornerstone 4 vs GitBucket: What are the differences?

Intergration of features: Cornerstone 4 is a version control system specifically designed for Mac operating systems, providing seamless integration with macOS features and applications. On the other hand, GitBucket is a web-based Git repository manager that focuses on providing a collaborative platform for software development teams, with support for various operating systems such as Windows, Linux, and macOS.
User Interface: One key difference between Cornerstone 4 and GitBucket is the user interface. Cornerstone 4 offers a Graphical User Interface (GUI) that is tailored for Mac users, making it visually appealing and easy to navigate. GitBucket, on the other hand, is primarily accessed through a web browser, providing a more universal interface accessible from any device with an internet connection.
Access Control: When it comes to access control, Cornerstone 4 offers fine-grained permissions and access control for individual files and folders, allowing users to manage and restrict access to specific parts of the repository. GitBucket, however, provides more general access control settings at the repository level, offering basic permissions such as read, write, and admin.
Offline Work: Another significant difference is the ability to work offline. Cornerstone 4 allows users to work offline and then sync changes with the repository once back online, providing flexibility for users who need to work remotely or in areas with limited internet connectivity. GitBucket, being a web-based platform, requires an internet connection to access and interact with repositories, limiting offline work capabilities.
Support for Plugins: GitBucket distinguishes itself by offering support for a wide range of plugins that enhance its functionality and integrate with other tools and services, allowing users to customize their experience and add features based on their specific needs. Cornerstone 4, on the other hand, does not have a plugin ecosystem, offering a more streamlined and consistent user experience without additional integrations.

In Summary, Cornerstone 4 and GitBucket differ in terms of integration with macOS features, user interface, access control, offline work capabilities, support for plugins, and overall focus on collaboration and customization.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

GitBucket	Cornerstone 4
GitBucket provides a Github-like UI and features such as Git repository hosting via HTTP and SSH, repository viewer, issues, wiki and pull request.	The ultimate Subversion client for Mac just got better with Shelving, Checkpointing, and blazing fast performance. It is the fastest SVN Client.
Public / Private Git repository (http and ssh access);Repository viewer and online file editing;Repository search (Code and Issues);Wiki;Issues;Fork / Pull request;Mail notification;Activity timeline;User management (for Administrators);Group (like Organization in Github);LDAP integration;Gravatar support	Working Copy Browser; Image Differences; Merging; Timeline
Statistics
Stacks 79	Stacks 0
Followers 177	Followers 1
Votes 36	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 8 Self hosted 7 Open source 6 Familiar interface 5 Scala 5 Simple setup	No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available	macOS SVN (Subversion)

What are some alternatives to GitBucket, Cornerstone 4?

GitHub

GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together.

Bitbucket

Bitbucket gives teams one place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private Git repositories. Teams choose Bitbucket because it has a superior Jira integration, built-in CI/CD, & is free for up to 5 users.

GitLab

GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.

RhodeCode

RhodeCode provides centralized control over distributed code repositories. Developers get code review tools and custom APIs that work in Mercurial, Git & SVN. Firms get unified security and user control so that their CTOs can sleep at night

AWS CodeCommit

CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.

Gogs

The goal of this project is to make the easiest, fastest and most painless way to set up a self-hosted Git service. With Go, this can be done in independent binary distribution across ALL platforms that Go supports, including Linux, Mac OS X, and Windows.

Gitea

Git with a cup of tea! Painless self-hosted all-in-one software development service, including Git hosting, code review, team collaboration, package registry and CI/CD. It published under the MIT license.

Upsource

Upsource summarizes recent changes in your repository, showing commit messages, authors, quick diffs, links to detailed diff views and associated code reviews. A commit graph helps visualize the history of commits, branches and merges in your repository.

Beanstalk

A single process to commit code, review with the team, and deploy the final result to your customers.

BinTray

Bintray offers developers the fastest way to publish and consume OSS software releases. With Bintray's full self-service platform developers have full control over their published software and how it is distributed to the world.

Related Comparisons

Cornerstone 4 vs GitBucket: What are the differences?

Intergration of features: Cornerstone 4 is a version control system specifically designed for Mac operating systems, providing seamless integration with macOS features and applications. On the other hand, GitBucket is a web-based Git repository manager that focuses on providing a collaborative platform for software development teams, with support for various operating systems such as Windows, Linux, and macOS.
User Interface: One key difference between Cornerstone 4 and GitBucket is the user interface. Cornerstone 4 offers a Graphical User Interface (GUI) that is tailored for Mac users, making it visually appealing and easy to navigate. GitBucket, on the other hand, is primarily accessed through a web browser, providing a more universal interface accessible from any device with an internet connection.
Access Control: When it comes to access control, Cornerstone 4 offers fine-grained permissions and access control for individual files and folders, allowing users to manage and restrict access to specific parts of the repository. GitBucket, however, provides more general access control settings at the repository level, offering basic permissions such as read, write, and admin.
Offline Work: Another significant difference is the ability to work offline. Cornerstone 4 allows users to work offline and then sync changes with the repository once back online, providing flexibility for users who need to work remotely or in areas with limited internet connectivity. GitBucket, being a web-based platform, requires an internet connection to access and interact with repositories, limiting offline work capabilities.
Support for Plugins: GitBucket distinguishes itself by offering support for a wide range of plugins that enhance its functionality and integrate with other tools and services, allowing users to customize their experience and add features based on their specific needs. Cornerstone 4, on the other hand, does not have a plugin ecosystem, offering a more streamlined and consistent user experience without additional integrations.

Cornerstone 4 vs GitBucket

Overview