StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. Search
  4. Search As A Service
  5. Couchbase vs Elasticsearch

Couchbase vs Elasticsearch

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Elasticsearch
Elasticsearch
Stacks35.5K
Followers27.1K
Votes1.6K
Couchbase
Couchbase
Stacks505
Followers606
Votes110

Couchbase vs Elasticsearch: What are the differences?

Introduction

Couchbase and Elasticsearch are both popular databases that have certain key differences. This markdown code provides a comparison between the two technologies.

  1. Data Structure: Couchbase is a document-oriented NoSQL database, where data is stored as JSON documents. Elasticsearch, on the other hand, is a distributed search and analytics engine that also uses JSON documents for data storage. However, Elasticsearch is primarily focused on full-text search and provides advanced search capabilities.

  2. Scalability: Couchbase is designed to be highly scalable, offering distributed architecture and auto-sharding for data distribution across multiple nodes. It provides built-in horizontal scalability and can handle large amounts of data with ease. Elasticsearch is also built for scalability and distributed computing, but its main focus is on search and querying capabilities rather than data storage alone.

  3. Data Querying: Couchbase offers a flexible query language called N1QL (SQL for JSON) that allows developers to perform complex and ad-hoc queries on JSON documents. N1QL supports joins, indexes, and other SQL-like features. On the other hand, Elasticsearch provides a powerful search API based on Lucene, enabling full-text search, filtering, aggregations, and various search-related features. It is optimized for fast and efficient search operations.

  4. Data Replication and Consistency: Couchbase provides multi-master replication, where data can be replicated across different data centers to ensure high availability and data consistency. It also supports eventual consistency, where read operations may not always reflect the latest updates but provide low-latency responses. Elasticsearch, on the other hand, uses a distributed approach with data replication across nodes for fault tolerance. It guarantees near real-time consistency and ensures that search operations are always performed on up-to-date data.

  5. Data Analysis and Visualization: While both Couchbase and Elasticsearch offer capabilities for data analysis, Elasticsearch provides more advanced analytics and visualization options. With its built-in aggregations, Elasticsearch allows developers to perform complex data analysis tasks and generate visualizations directly. Couchbase, on the other hand, may require integration with third-party tools or custom solutions for advanced analytics and visualization.

  6. Use Cases: Couchbase is commonly used in applications where high-performance, high-availability, and scalability are critical requirements, such as real-time analytics, caching, and user profile management. Elasticsearch, on the other hand, is widely used for log analysis, monitoring, full-text search, and data exploration tasks. It is particularly popular in the field of enterprise search and log management.

In summary, Couchbase is a document-oriented NoSQL database focused on data storage and high performance, while Elasticsearch is a distributed search and analytics engine specializing in full-text search and complex querying capabilities. Both databases offer scalability and fault tolerance but cater to different use cases with their unique features and functionalities.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Elasticsearch, Couchbase

Gabriel
Gabriel

CEO at Naologic

Jan 2, 2020

DecidedonCouchDBCouchDBCouchbaseCouchbaseMemcachedMemcached

We implemented our first large scale EPR application from naologic.com using CouchDB .

Very fast, replication works great, doesn't consume much RAM, queries are blazing fast but we found a problem: the queries were very hard to write, it took a long time to figure out the API, we had to go and write our own @nodejs library to make it work properly.

It lost most of its support. Since then, we migrated to Couchbase and the learning curve was steep but all worth it. Memcached indexing out of the box, full text search works great.

592k views592k
Comments
Mike
Mike

Mar 20, 2020

Needs advice

We Have thousands of .pdf docs generated from the same form but with lots of variability. We need to extract data from open text and more important - from tables inside the docs. The output of Couchbase/Mongo will be one row per document for backend processing. ADOBE renders the tables in an unusable form.

241k views241k
Comments
Rana Usman
Rana Usman

Chief Technology Officer at TechAvanza

Jun 4, 2020

Needs adviceonFirebaseFirebaseElasticsearchElasticsearchAlgoliaAlgolia

Hey everybody! (1) I am developing an android application. I have data of around 3 million record (less than a TB). I want to save that data in the cloud. Which company provides the best cloud database services that would suit my scenario? It should be secured, long term useable, and provide better services. I decided to use Firebase Realtime database. Should I stick with Firebase or are there any other companies that provide a better service?

(2) I have the functionality of searching data in my app. Same data (less than a TB). Which search solution should I use in this case? I found Elasticsearch and Algolia search. It should be secure and fast. If any other company provides better services than these, please feel free to suggest them.

Thank you!

408k views408k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Elasticsearch
Elasticsearch
Couchbase
Couchbase

Elasticsearch is a distributed, RESTful search and analytics engine capable of storing data and searching it in near real time. Elasticsearch, Kibana, Beats and Logstash are the Elastic Stack (sometimes called the ELK Stack).

Developed as an alternative to traditionally inflexible SQL databases, the Couchbase NoSQL database is built on an open source foundation and architected to help developers solve real-world problems and meet high scalability demands.

Distributed and Highly Available Search Engine;Multi Tenant with Multi Types;Various set of APIs including RESTful;Clients available in many languages including Java, Python, .NET, C#, Groovy, and more;Document oriented;Reliable, Asynchronous Write Behind for long term persistency;(Near) Real Time Search;Built on top of Apache Lucene;Per operation consistency;Inverted indices with finite state transducers for full-text querying;BKD trees for storing numeric and geo data;Column store for analytics;Compatible with Hadoop using the ES-Hadoop connector;Open Source under Apache 2 and Elastic License
JSON document database; N1QL (SQL-like query language); Secondary Indexing; Full-Text Indexing; Eventing/Triggers; Real-Time Analytics; Mobile Synchronization for offline support; Autonomous Operator for Kubernetes and OpenShift
Statistics
Stacks
35.5K
Stacks
505
Followers
27.1K
Followers
606
Votes
1.6K
Votes
110
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 329
    Powerful api
  • 315
    Great search engine
  • 231
    Open source
  • 214
    Restful
  • 200
    Near real-time search
Cons
  • 7
    Resource hungry
  • 6
    Diffecult to get started
  • 5
    Expensive
  • 4
    Hard to keep stable at large scale
Pros
  • 18
    Flexible data model, easy scalability, extremely fast
  • 18
    High performance
  • 9
    Mobile app support
  • 7
    You can query it with Ansi-92 SQL
  • 6
    All nodes can be read/write
Cons
  • 3
    Terrible query language
Integrations
Kibana
Kibana
Beats
Beats
Logstash
Logstash
Hadoop
Hadoop
Kafka
Kafka
Kubernetes
Kubernetes
Apache Spark
Apache Spark

What are some alternatives to Elasticsearch, Couchbase?

MongoDB

MongoDB

MongoDB stores data in JSON-like documents that can vary in structure, offering a dynamic, flexible schema. MongoDB was also designed for high availability and scalability, with built-in replication and auto-sharding.

MySQL

MySQL

The MySQL software delivers a very fast, multi-threaded, multi-user, and robust SQL (Structured Query Language) database server. MySQL Server is intended for mission-critical, heavy-load production systems as well as for embedding into mass-deployed software.

PostgreSQL

PostgreSQL

PostgreSQL is an advanced object-relational database management system that supports an extended subset of the SQL standard, including transactions, foreign keys, subqueries, triggers, user-defined types and functions.

Algolia

Algolia

Our mission is to make you a search expert. Push data to our API to make it searchable in real time. Build your dream front end with one of our web or mobile UI libraries. Tune relevance and get analytics right from your dashboard.

Microsoft SQL Server

Microsoft SQL Server

Microsoft® SQL Server is a database management and analysis system for e-commerce, line-of-business, and data warehousing solutions.

SQLite

SQLite

SQLite is an embedded SQL database engine. Unlike most other SQL databases, SQLite does not have a separate server process. SQLite reads and writes directly to ordinary disk files. A complete SQL database with multiple tables, indices, triggers, and views, is contained in a single disk file.

Cassandra

Cassandra

Partitioning means that Cassandra can distribute your data across multiple machines in an application-transparent matter. Cassandra will automatically repartition as machines are added and removed from the cluster. Row store means that like relational databases, Cassandra organizes data by rows and columns. The Cassandra Query Language (CQL) is a close relative of SQL.

Memcached

Memcached

Memcached is an in-memory key-value store for small chunks of arbitrary data (strings, objects) from results of database calls, API calls, or page rendering.

MariaDB

MariaDB

Started by core members of the original MySQL team, MariaDB actively works with outside developers to deliver the most featureful, stable, and sanely licensed open SQL server in the industry. MariaDB is designed as a drop-in replacement of MySQL(R) with more features, new storage engines, fewer bugs, and better performance.

RethinkDB

RethinkDB

RethinkDB is built to store JSON documents, and scale to multiple machines with very little effort. It has a pleasant query language that supports really useful queries like table joins and group by, and is easy to setup and learn.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase