Coveralls vs GitHub Enterprise

Overview

Coveralls

Stacks1.7K

Followers278

Votes68

GitHub Enterprise

Stacks500

Followers627

Votes10

Coveralls vs GitHub Enterprise: What are the differences?

Coveralls: Track your project's code coverage over time, changes to files, and badge your GitHub repo. Coveralls works with your CI server and sifts through your coverage data to find issues you didn't even know you had before they become a problem. Free for open source, pro accounts for private repos, instant sign up with GitHub OAuth; GitHub Enterprise: The on-premises version of GitHub, which you can deploy and manage in your own, secure environment. GitHub Enterprise lets developers use the tools they love across the development process with support for popular IDEs, continuous integration tools, and hundreds of third party apps and services.

Coveralls and GitHub Enterprise are primarily classified as "Code Coverage" and "Code Collaboration & Version Control" tools respectively.

Some of the features offered by Coveralls are:

Repository Coverage Statistics
Individual File Coverage Reports
Line By Line Coverage

On the other hand, GitHub Enterprise provides the following key features:

Compliance and auditing
Hundreds of integrations
Flexible deployment

According to the StackShare community, Coveralls has a broader approval, being mentioned in 58 company stacks & 45 developers stacks; compared to GitHub Enterprise, which is listed in 38 company stacks and 46 developer stacks.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Coveralls, GitHub Enterprise

Felipe

May 24, 2020

Needs advice

My website is brand new and one of the few requirements of testings I had to implement was code coverage. Never though it was so hard to implement using a #docker container.
Given my lack of experience, every attempt I tried on making a simple code coverage test using the 4 combinations of #TravisCI, #CircleCi with #Coveralls, #Codecov I failed. The main problem was I was generating the .coverage file within the docker container and couldn't access it with #TravisCi or #CircleCi, every attempt to solve this problem seems to be very hacky and this was not the kind of complexity I want to introduce to my newborn website.
This problem was solved using a specific action for #GitHubActions, it was a 3 line solution I had to put in my github workflow file and I was able to access the .coverage file from my docker container and get the coverage report with #Codecov.

198k views198k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Coveralls	GitHub Enterprise
Coveralls works with your CI server and sifts through your coverage data to find issues you didn't even know you had before they become a problem. Free for open source, pro accounts for private repos, instant sign up with GitHub OAuth.	GitHub Enterprise lets developers use the tools they love across the development process with support for popular IDEs, continuous integration tools, and hundreds of third party apps and services.
Repository Coverage Statistics;Individual File Coverage Reports;Line By Line Coverage;Repository Overview	Compliance and auditing;Hundreds of integrations;Flexible deployment;Centralized permissions;Powerful dashboards;Technical support
Statistics
Stacks 1.7K	Stacks 500
Followers 278	Followers 627
Votes 68	Votes 10
Pros & Cons
Pros 45 Free for public repositories 13 Code coverage 7 Ease of integration 2 More stable than Codecov 1 Combines coverage from multiple/parallel test runs	Pros 4 Expensive - $$$ 2 CDCI with Github Actions 2 Code security 1 Draft Pull Request 1 Both Cloud and Enterprise Server Versions available Cons 2 $$$
Integrations
Travis CI CircleCI Semaphore Jenkins Codeship	No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Coveralls, GitHub Enterprise?

GitHub

GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together.

Bitbucket

Bitbucket gives teams one place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private Git repositories. Teams choose Bitbucket because it has a superior Jira integration, built-in CI/CD, & is free for up to 5 users.

GitLab

GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.

RhodeCode

RhodeCode provides centralized control over distributed code repositories. Developers get code review tools and custom APIs that work in Mercurial, Git & SVN. Firms get unified security and user control so that their CTOs can sleep at night

AWS CodeCommit

CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.

Gogs

The goal of this project is to make the easiest, fastest and most painless way to set up a self-hosted Git service. With Go, this can be done in independent binary distribution across ALL platforms that Go supports, including Linux, Mac OS X, and Windows.

Gitea

Git with a cup of tea! Painless self-hosted all-in-one software development service, including Git hosting, code review, team collaboration, package registry and CI/CD. It published under the MIT license.

Codecov

Our patrons rave about our elegant coverage reports, integrated pull request comments, interactive commit graphs, our Chrome plugin and security.

Upsource

Upsource summarizes recent changes in your repository, showing commit messages, authors, quick diffs, links to detailed diff views and associated code reviews. A commit graph helps visualize the history of commits, branches and merges in your repository.

Beanstalk

A single process to commit code, review with the team, and deploy the final result to your customers.

Related Comparisons

Some of the features offered by Coveralls are:

Repository Coverage Statistics
Individual File Coverage Reports
Line By Line Coverage

On the other hand, GitHub Enterprise provides the following key features:

Compliance and auditing
Hundreds of integrations
Flexible deployment

Coveralls vs GitHub Enterprise