Coveralls vs GitLab: What are the differences?
What is Coveralls? Track your project's code coverage over time, changes to files, and badge your GitHub repo. Coveralls works with your CI server and sifts through your coverage data to find issues you didn't even know you had before they become a problem. Free for open source, pro accounts for private repos, instant sign up with GitHub OAuth.
What is GitLab? Open source self-hosted Git management software. GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.
Coveralls can be classified as a tool in the "Code Coverage" category, while GitLab is grouped under "Code Collaboration & Version Control".
Some of the features offered by Coveralls are:
- Repository Coverage Statistics
- Individual File Coverage Reports
- Line By Line Coverage
On the other hand, GitLab provides the following key features:
- Manage git repositories with fine grained access controls that keep your code secure
- Perform code reviews and enhance collaboration with merge requests
- Each project can also have an issue tracker and a wiki
"Free for public repositories" is the top reason why over 44 developers like Coveralls, while over 451 developers mention "Self hosted" as the leading cause for choosing GitLab.
GitLab is an open source tool with 20.1K GitHub stars and 5.33K GitHub forks. Here's a link to GitLab's open source repository on GitHub.
Alibaba.com, trivago, and Avocode are some of the popular companies that use GitLab, whereas Coveralls is used by Mapbox, Kong, and Apcera. GitLab has a broader approval, being mentioned in 1233 company stacks & 1475 developers stacks; compared to Coveralls, which is listed in 58 company stacks and 45 developer stacks.