StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Build Automation
  4. Front End Package Manager
  5. Coverity Scan vs npm

Coverity Scan vs npm

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

npm
npm
Stacks137.4K
Followers82.2K
Votes1.6K
GitHub Stars17.6K
Forks3.0K
Coverity Scan
Coverity Scan
Stacks50
Followers185
Votes0

Coverity Scan vs npm: What are the differences?

Key Differences between Coverity Scan and npm

1. Scalability of Use Cases: Coverity Scan is a static analysis tool specifically designed to identify defects and vulnerabilities in codebases of complex industrial-scale software projects, making it ideal for applications with large codebases and extensive interdependencies. On the other hand, npm is a package manager primarily used for JavaScript projects and focuses on facilitating the installation and management of reusable code packages rather than analyzing the quality of the code itself.

2. Analysis Depth and Scope: Coverity Scan performs a deep analysis of the entire codebase, including complex interrelationships and interactions, to identify potential defects, security vulnerabilities, and best coding practices violations. It provides extensive support for a wide range of programming languages and has a rich set of advanced analysis techniques. In contrast, npm primarily focuses on the retrieval, installation, and management of code packages and does not provide in-depth code analysis capabilities.

3. Automation and Integration: Coverity Scan can be integrated into the software development life cycle, enabling continuous and automated analysis of code changes, as well as integration with popular build and version control systems. It offers APIs for seamless integration with various development tools, making it easier to incorporate code analysis into the development process. npm, on the other hand, is primarily used as a command-line tool for package installation and does not offer extensive automation and integration capabilities.

4. Reporting and Visualization: Coverity Scan provides detailed reports containing specific code issues, analysis results, and recommendations for fixing defects and vulnerabilities. It offers visualization tools, such as flow graphs and cross-file navigation, to help developers understand and navigate through complex codebases. npm, on the other hand, does not provide detailed analysis reports or visualization tools specifically for code analysis.

5. Community and Ecosystem: Coverity Scan has a strong community of users, developers, and contributors, with extensive resources, forums, and knowledge bases to support users in utilizing the tool effectively. It is often used by enterprise-level organizations and is backed by the expertise of Synopsys. npm, on the other hand, has a larger and more diverse ecosystem with a focus on package management, including a vast collection of open-source packages, community-driven support channels, and a dedicated registry for publishing and distributing packages.

6. Licensing and Cost: Coverity Scan is a commercial product that offers both free and paid plans, with more advanced features and support available in paid versions. It provides options for on-premises deployment or cloud-based usage. npm, on the other hand, is an open-source tool and the npm registry is freely accessible. However, certain npm packages may have their own licenses or require licensing for commercial usage.

In Summary, Coverity Scan is an advanced static analysis tool for industrial-scale codebases, offering deep analysis, automation, reporting, and integration capabilities, while npm primarily serves as a package manager for JavaScript projects with a larger ecosystem and focuses on package management rather than code analysis.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on npm, Coverity Scan

StackShare
StackShare

Apr 23, 2019

Needs adviceonNode.jsNode.jsnpmnpmYarnYarn

From a StackShare Community member: “I’m a freelance web developer (I mostly use Node.js) and for future projects I’m debating between npm or Yarn as my default package manager. I’m a minimalist so I hate installing software if I don’t need to- in this case that would be Yarn. For those who made the switch from npm to Yarn, what benefits have you noticed? For those who stuck with npm, are you happy you with it?"

294k views294k
Comments
Mark
Mark

CTO at Gemsotec bvba

Apr 25, 2019

ReviewonReactReactTypeScriptTypeScriptYarnYarn

I use npm because I also mainly use React and TypeScript. Since several typings (from DefinitelyTyped) depend on the React typings, Yarn tends to mess up which leads to duplicate libraries present (different versions of the same type definition), which hinders the Typescript compiler. Npm always resolves to a single version per transitive dependency. At least that's my experience with both.

251k views251k
Comments
Oleksandr
Oleksandr

Senior Software Engineer at joyn

Dec 7, 2019

Decided

As we have to build the application for many different TV platforms we want to split the application logic from the device/platform specific code. Previously we had different repositories and it was very hard to keep the development process when changes were done in multiple repositories, as we had to synchronize code reviews as well as merging and then updating the dependencies of projects. This issues would be even more critical when building the project from scratch what we did at Joyn. Therefor to keep all code in one place, at the same time keeping in separated in different modules we decided to give a try to monorepo. First we tried out lerna which was fine at the beginning, but later along the way we had issues with adding new dependencies which came out of the blue and were not easy to fix. Next round of evolution was yarn workspaces, we are still using it and are pretty happy with dev experience it provides. And one more advantage we got when switched to yarn workspaces that we also switched from npm to yarn what improved the state of the lock file a lot, because with npm package-lock file was updated every time you run npm install, frequent updates of package-lock file were causing very often merge conflicts. So right now we not just having faster dependencies installation time but also no conflicts coming from lock file.

310k views310k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

npm
npm
Coverity Scan
Coverity Scan

npm is the command-line interface to the npm ecosystem. It is battle-tested, surprisingly flexible, and used by hundreds of thousands of JavaScript developers every day.

Coverity's implementation of static analysis can follow all the possible paths of execution through source code (including interprocedurally) and find defects and vulnerabilities caused by the conjunction of statements that are not errors independent of each other.

-
Test every line of code and potential execution path.;The root cause of each defect is clearly explained, making it easy to fix bugs;Integrates with GitHub and Travis CI
Statistics
GitHub Stars
17.6K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
3.0K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
137.4K
Stacks
50
Followers
82.2K
Followers
185
Votes
1.6K
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 648
    Best package management system for javascript
  • 382
    Open-source
  • 327
    Great community
  • 148
    More packages than rubygems, pypi, or packagist
  • 112
    Nice people matter
Cons
  • 5
    Bad at package versioning and being deterministic
  • 5
    Problems with lockfiles
  • 3
    Node-gyp takes forever
  • 1
    Super slow
No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available
GitHub
GitHub
Travis CI
Travis CI

What are some alternatives to npm, Coverity Scan?

RequireJS

RequireJS

RequireJS loads plain JavaScript files as well as more defined modules. It is optimized for in-browser use, including in a Web Worker, but it can be used in other JavaScript environments, like Rhino and Node. It implements the Asynchronous Module API. Using a modular script loader like RequireJS will improve the speed and quality of your code.

Code Climate

Code Climate

After each Git push, Code Climate analyzes your code for complexity, duplication, and common smells to determine changes in quality and surface technical debt hotspots.

Browserify

Browserify

Browserify lets you require('modules') in the browser by bundling up all of your dependencies.

Codacy

Codacy

Codacy automates code reviews and monitors code quality on every commit and pull request on more than 40 programming languages reporting back the impact of every commit or PR, issues concerning code style, best practices and security.

Phabricator

Phabricator

Phabricator is a collection of open source web applications that help software companies build better software.

Yarn

Yarn

Yarn caches every package it downloads so it never needs to again. It also parallelizes operations to maximize resource utilization so install times are faster than ever.

PullReview

PullReview

PullReview helps Ruby and Rails developers to develop new features cleanly, on-time, and with confidence by automatically reviewing their code.

Gerrit Code Review

Gerrit Code Review

Gerrit is a self-hosted pre-commit code review tool. It serves as a Git hosting server with option to comment incoming changes. It is highly configurable and extensible with default guarding policies, webhooks, project access control and more.

SonarQube

SonarQube

SonarQube provides an overview of the overall health of your source code and even more importantly, it highlights issues found on new code. With a Quality Gate set on your project, you will simply fix the Leak and start mechanically improving.

RuboCop

RuboCop

RuboCop is a Ruby static code analyzer. Out of the box it will enforce many of the guidelines outlined in the community Ruby Style Guide.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana