StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Code Review
  4. Code Review
  5. Coverity Scan vs TSLint

Coverity Scan vs TSLint

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Coverity Scan
Coverity Scan
Stacks50
Followers185
Votes0
TSLint
TSLint
Stacks3.4K
Followers234
Votes0

Coverity Scan vs TSLint: What are the differences?

Introduction: In the context of software development, understanding the key differences between Coverity Scan and TSLint can help developers make informed decisions on the tools to use for code analysis and quality assurance.

  1. Static vs. Dynamic Analysis: Coverity Scan primarily focuses on static analysis, which involves analyzing the code without executing it, while TSLint is a static analysis tool specifically designed for TypeScript, a superset of JavaScript. TSLint checks the code against a set of predefined rules to identify potential errors or code smells, providing developers with feedback before runtime.

  2. Language Support: Coverity Scan supports a wide range of programming languages like C, C++, Java, and C#, making it versatile for different development environments. On the other hand, TSLint is specific to TypeScript, providing targeted analysis and recommendations for projects written in this language.

  3. Integration with Development Workflow: Coverity Scan can integrate with various continuous integration (CI) systems and development tools, enabling automatic code analysis and reporting within the development workflow. TSLint, as a standalone tool, needs to be configured separately within the development environment, potentially requiring additional setup steps for integration.

  4. Customization Options: Coverity Scan offers extensive customization options for defining analysis rules, thresholds, and reporting mechanisms to tailor the analysis process according to the project requirements. TSLint also provides configuration settings for rule customization, allowing developers to adjust the analysis based on the specific coding standards or practices of the project.

  5. Community Support and Maintenance: Coverity Scan is supported and maintained by Synopsys, a leading software security company, ensuring regular updates and technical support for users. TSLint, while widely used in the TypeScript community, has been deprecated in favor of ESLint, another popular static analysis tool, indicating a shift in focus towards newer technologies for code quality assurance.

In Summary, understanding the differences between Coverity Scan and TSLint can help developers choose the right tool for static code analysis based on language support, customization options, integration capabilities, and ongoing community support.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Coverity Scan, TSLint

Budi
Budi

Programmer

Aug 19, 2020

Review

I think you scan skip MongoDB for now and focussing on creating web component with Reactjs or Vue, I would also recommend to use TypeScript for type hinting support.

For styling, learn CSS first then upgrade to SASS/SCSS or LESS (pick one as mostly same concept) to make CSS more maintainable.

Also to improve your skill on both sectors, install linters if available. For TypeScipt, there are TSLint and for styling, i think there are Stylint. Linter will help you adapt to make a clean code and understand how other peoples usually styled their code.

41.6k views41.6k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Coverity Scan
Coverity Scan
TSLint
TSLint

Coverity's implementation of static analysis can follow all the possible paths of execution through source code (including interprocedurally) and find defects and vulnerabilities caused by the conjunction of statements that are not errors independent of each other.

An extensible static analysis tool that checks TypeScript code for readability, maintainability, and functionality errors. It is widely supported across modern editors & build systems and can be customized with your own lint rules, configurations, and formatters.

Test every line of code and potential execution path.;The root cause of each defect is clearly explained, making it easy to fix bugs;Integrates with GitHub and Travis CI
Extensive set of core rules; Custom lint rules; Custom formatters (failure reporters); Configuration presets; Composition; Automatic fixing of formatting & style violations
Statistics
Stacks
50
Stacks
3.4K
Followers
185
Followers
234
Votes
0
Votes
0
Integrations
GitHub
GitHub
Travis CI
Travis CI
Vim
Vim
Visual Studio Code
Visual Studio Code
TypeScript
TypeScript
Atom
Atom
WebStorm
WebStorm
Emacs
Emacs
gulp
gulp
Sublime Text
Sublime Text
Visual Studio
Visual Studio
Grunt
Grunt

What are some alternatives to Coverity Scan, TSLint?

Code Climate

Code Climate

After each Git push, Code Climate analyzes your code for complexity, duplication, and common smells to determine changes in quality and surface technical debt hotspots.

Codacy

Codacy

Codacy automates code reviews and monitors code quality on every commit and pull request on more than 40 programming languages reporting back the impact of every commit or PR, issues concerning code style, best practices and security.

Phabricator

Phabricator

Phabricator is a collection of open source web applications that help software companies build better software.

PullReview

PullReview

PullReview helps Ruby and Rails developers to develop new features cleanly, on-time, and with confidence by automatically reviewing their code.

Gerrit Code Review

Gerrit Code Review

Gerrit is a self-hosted pre-commit code review tool. It serves as a Git hosting server with option to comment incoming changes. It is highly configurable and extensible with default guarding policies, webhooks, project access control and more.

SonarQube

SonarQube

SonarQube provides an overview of the overall health of your source code and even more importantly, it highlights issues found on new code. With a Quality Gate set on your project, you will simply fix the Leak and start mechanically improving.

RuboCop

RuboCop

RuboCop is a Ruby static code analyzer. Out of the box it will enforce many of the guidelines outlined in the community Ruby Style Guide.

CodeFactor.io

CodeFactor.io

CodeFactor.io automatically and continuously tracks code quality with every GitHub or BitBucket commit and pull request, helping software developers save time in code reviews and efficiently tackle technical debt.

ESLint

ESLint

A pluggable and configurable linter tool for identifying and reporting on patterns in JavaScript. Maintain your code quality with ease.

Amazon CodeGuru

Amazon CodeGuru

It is a machine learning service for automated code reviews and application performance recommendations. It helps you find the most expensive lines of code that hurt application performance and keep you up all night troubleshooting, then gives you specific recommendations to fix or improve your code.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana