Coverity Scan vs Veracode

Overview

Coverity Scan

Stacks50

Followers185

Votes0

Veracode

Stacks66

Followers129

Votes0

Coverity Scan vs Veracode: What are the differences?

Static Application Security Testing (SAST) vs Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST): Coverity Scan primarily focuses on SAST, performing static code analysis to detect vulnerabilities in the source code. On the other hand, Veracode emphasizes DAST, which analyzes applications in a running state to identify security flaws, making it suitable for web applications.
Deployment Model: Coverity Scan is an open-source tool that can be integrated into the development process, allowing developers to run scans locally. In contrast, Veracode is a cloud-based service, providing a centralized platform for security testing without the need for additional setup.
Customization and Configuration: Veracode offers more customization options in terms of policies and compliance standards that can be tailored to specific project requirements. Coverity Scan, while powerful in its analysis capabilities, may have limited customization features compared to Veracode.
Reporting and Remediation: Veracode provides detailed reports with actionable remediation advice, helping developers understand and fix security issues effectively. Coverity Scan may have simpler reports compared to Veracode, which may require additional effort from developers to interpret and address identified vulnerabilities.
Scalability and Enterprise Support: Veracode is designed for enterprise-level usage, offering scalability features such as API integration, support for multiple languages, and dedicated customer support. Coverity Scan, as an open-source tool, may have limitations in scalability and enterprise-grade support.
Cost and Licensing: Coverity Scan being open-source is generally free to use, making it a cost-effective solution for small to medium-sized projects. Veracode, being a commercial product, involves licensing fees based on usage and features required, making it more suitable for larger organizations with budget allocations for security testing.

In Summary, the comparison between Coverity Scan and Veracode highlights differences in SAST vs DAST focus, deployment models, customization, reporting, scalability, and cost.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Coverity Scan	Veracode
Coverity's implementation of static analysis can follow all the possible paths of execution through source code (including interprocedurally) and find defects and vulnerabilities caused by the conjunction of statements that are not errors independent of each other.	It seamlessly integrates application security into the software lifecycle, effectively eliminating vulnerabilities during the lowest-cost point in the development/deployment chain, and blocking threats while in production.
Test every line of code and potential execution path.;The root cause of each defect is clearly explained, making it easy to fix bugs;Integrates with GitHub and Travis CI	Statice Application Security Scanning; Dynamic Application Security Scanning
Statistics
Stacks 50	Stacks 66
Followers 185	Followers 129
Votes 0	Votes 0
Integrations
GitHub Travis CI	Gradle Apache Maven Jenkins Bitbucket Travis CI Apache Ant Appveyor

What are some alternatives to Coverity Scan, Veracode?

Code Climate

After each Git push, Code Climate analyzes your code for complexity, duplication, and common smells to determine changes in quality and surface technical debt hotspots.

Codacy

Codacy automates code reviews and monitors code quality on every commit and pull request on more than 40 programming languages reporting back the impact of every commit or PR, issues concerning code style, best practices and security.

Phabricator

Phabricator is a collection of open source web applications that help software companies build better software.

Let's Encrypt

It is a free, automated, and open certificate authority brought to you by the non-profit Internet Security Research Group (ISRG).

PullReview

PullReview helps Ruby and Rails developers to develop new features cleanly, on-time, and with confidence by automatically reviewing their code.

Gerrit Code Review

Gerrit is a self-hosted pre-commit code review tool. It serves as a Git hosting server with option to comment incoming changes. It is highly configurable and extensible with default guarding policies, webhooks, project access control and more.

SonarQube

SonarQube provides an overview of the overall health of your source code and even more importantly, it highlights issues found on new code. With a Quality Gate set on your project, you will simply fix the Leak and start mechanically improving.

Sqreen

Sqreen is a security platform that helps engineering team protect their web applications, API and micro-services in real-time. The solution installs with a simple application library and doesn't require engineering resources to operate. Security anomalies triggered are reported with technical context to help engineers fix the code. Ops team can assess the impact of attacks and monitor suspicious user accounts involved.

RuboCop

RuboCop is a Ruby static code analyzer. Out of the box it will enforce many of the guidelines outlined in the community Ruby Style Guide.

Instant 2FA

Add a powerful, simple and flexible 2FA verification view to your login flow, without making any DB changes and just 3 API calls.

Related Comparisons

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana

Coverity Scan vs Veracode: What are the differences?

Static Application Security Testing (SAST) vs Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST): Coverity Scan primarily focuses on SAST, performing static code analysis to detect vulnerabilities in the source code. On the other hand, Veracode emphasizes DAST, which analyzes applications in a running state to identify security flaws, making it suitable for web applications.
Deployment Model: Coverity Scan is an open-source tool that can be integrated into the development process, allowing developers to run scans locally. In contrast, Veracode is a cloud-based service, providing a centralized platform for security testing without the need for additional setup.
Customization and Configuration: Veracode offers more customization options in terms of policies and compliance standards that can be tailored to specific project requirements. Coverity Scan, while powerful in its analysis capabilities, may have limited customization features compared to Veracode.
Reporting and Remediation: Veracode provides detailed reports with actionable remediation advice, helping developers understand and fix security issues effectively. Coverity Scan may have simpler reports compared to Veracode, which may require additional effort from developers to interpret and address identified vulnerabilities.
Scalability and Enterprise Support: Veracode is designed for enterprise-level usage, offering scalability features such as API integration, support for multiple languages, and dedicated customer support. Coverity Scan, as an open-source tool, may have limitations in scalability and enterprise-grade support.
Cost and Licensing: Coverity Scan being open-source is generally free to use, making it a cost-effective solution for small to medium-sized projects. Veracode, being a commercial product, involves licensing fees based on usage and features required, making it more suitable for larger organizations with budget allocations for security testing.

In Summary, the comparison between Coverity Scan and Veracode highlights differences in SAST vs DAST focus, deployment models, customization, reporting, scalability, and cost.