StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Code Review
  4. Code Review
  5. Credo vs Sider

Credo vs Sider

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Credo
Credo
Stacks28
Followers12
Votes0
GitHub Stars5.1K
Forks434
Sider
Sider
Stacks3
Followers2
Votes0

Credo vs Sider: What are the differences?

# Introduction
Credo and Sider are both code analysis tools used by software developers to maintain code quality and enhance productivity.

1. **Language Support**: Credo primarily focuses on Elixir code analysis, providing in-depth insights and recommendations for improving code quality within Elixir projects. On the other hand, Sider supports multiple languages such as Ruby, JavaScript, Python, and PHP, making it versatile and suitable for teams working on diverse projects.
2. **Integration Abilities**: Credo integrates seamlessly with popular Elixir development tools like Mix, making it convenient for developers to incorporate code analysis into their workflow. In contrast, Sider offers integration with a wide range of version control systems, CI/CD pipelines, and code hosting platforms, providing extensive support for various development environments.
3. **Customization Options**: Credo allows users to customize rulesets, configuration settings, and formatting options to align with specific project requirements, enabling personalized code analysis and enforcement. Conversely, Sider offers predefined rule sets and customization options but also provides automated suggestions for code improvements based on industry best practices.
4. **Static Code Analysis Capabilities**: Credo focuses on providing static code analysis to identify potential issues, enforce coding standards, and ensure code consistency within Elixir projects. Sider, on the other hand, offers static code analysis along with dynamic code analysis features, allowing developers to catch runtime errors and performance issues in addition to static code-related issues.
5. **Reporting and Visualization Tools**: While Credo provides detailed reports and visualizations to help developers understand code quality metrics and make informed decisions for code optimization, Sider offers interactive dashboards, trend analysis charts, and actionable insights to track code quality improvements over time and streamline the code review process effectively.
6. **Community Support and Documentation**: Credo boasts an active community of Elixir developers who contribute to the tool's development, offer support, and share best practices for utilizing the tool effectively. On the contrary, Sider provides comprehensive documentation, tutorials, and customer support to assist users in setting up, configuring, and maximizing the tool's capabilities for improving code quality in various programming languages.

In Summary, Credo and Sider differ in language support, integration abilities, customization options, static code analysis capabilities, reporting tools, and community support, catering to unique needs and preferences of software development teams.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Credo
Credo
Sider
Sider

credo can show you refactoring opportunities in your code, complex and duplicated code fragments, warn you about common mistakes, show inconsistencies in your naming scheme and - if needed - help you enforce a desired coding style.

It is a GitHub integrated tool that automatically analyzes pull request against custom per-project rulesets, as well as general best practices.

-
Share knowledge effectively; Prevent recurrence of known issues; Maintain consistency across the project
Statistics
GitHub Stars
5.1K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
434
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
28
Stacks
3
Followers
12
Followers
2
Votes
0
Votes
0
Integrations
Golang
Golang
Python
Python
JavaScript
JavaScript
PHP
PHP
Ruby
Ruby
Java
Java
C#
C#
GitHub
GitHub
Golang
Golang
Swift
Swift
C++
C++

What are some alternatives to Credo, Sider?

Code Climate

Code Climate

After each Git push, Code Climate analyzes your code for complexity, duplication, and common smells to determine changes in quality and surface technical debt hotspots.

Codacy

Codacy

Codacy automates code reviews and monitors code quality on every commit and pull request on more than 40 programming languages reporting back the impact of every commit or PR, issues concerning code style, best practices and security.

Phabricator

Phabricator

Phabricator is a collection of open source web applications that help software companies build better software.

PullReview

PullReview

PullReview helps Ruby and Rails developers to develop new features cleanly, on-time, and with confidence by automatically reviewing their code.

Gerrit Code Review

Gerrit Code Review

Gerrit is a self-hosted pre-commit code review tool. It serves as a Git hosting server with option to comment incoming changes. It is highly configurable and extensible with default guarding policies, webhooks, project access control and more.

SonarQube

SonarQube

SonarQube provides an overview of the overall health of your source code and even more importantly, it highlights issues found on new code. With a Quality Gate set on your project, you will simply fix the Leak and start mechanically improving.

RuboCop

RuboCop

RuboCop is a Ruby static code analyzer. Out of the box it will enforce many of the guidelines outlined in the community Ruby Style Guide.

CodeFactor.io

CodeFactor.io

CodeFactor.io automatically and continuously tracks code quality with every GitHub or BitBucket commit and pull request, helping software developers save time in code reviews and efficiently tackle technical debt.

ESLint

ESLint

A pluggable and configurable linter tool for identifying and reporting on patterns in JavaScript. Maintain your code quality with ease.

Amazon CodeGuru

Amazon CodeGuru

It is a machine learning service for automated code reviews and application performance recommendations. It helps you find the most expensive lines of code that hurt application performance and keep you up all night troubleshooting, then gives you specific recommendations to fix or improve your code.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana