StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Testing Frameworks
  4. Testing Frameworks
  5. Cucumber vs pytest

Cucumber vs pytest

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Cucumber
Cucumber
Stacks1.4K
Followers927
Votes36
pytest
pytest
Stacks4.0K
Followers306
Votes0
GitHub Stars13.2K
Forks2.9K

Cucumber vs pytest: What are the differences?

Key Differences between Cucumber and Pytest

Cucumber and Pytest are two popular testing frameworks used in software development. While both frameworks aim to simplify the process of writing and running tests, there are several key differences between them.

  1. Language: Cucumber is primarily used with the Gherkin language, a simple and human-readable format that allows for collaboration between technical and non-technical stakeholders. Pytest, on the other hand, is based on Python and offers a more traditional approach to test automation with its vast ecosystem and easy integration with other tools.

  2. Test Organization: Cucumber encourages behavior-driven development (BDD), with tests written in a step-based approach that aligns with the Given-When-Then structure. Pytest, on the other hand, allows for more flexibility in test organization, allowing developers to structure tests in a way that makes sense for their specific project requirements.

  3. Test Execution: Cucumber executes tests in a sequential manner, running each step of the scenario and reporting the results at the end. Pytest, on the other hand, follows a modular approach where tests can be executed independently, allowing for parallel execution and faster overall test execution time.

  4. Fixture Management: Cucumber offers limited support for fixtures, relying more on the Given-When-Then structure to set up and tear down test environments. Pytest, on the other hand, provides a robust fixture management system that allows for more fine-grained control over the test environment setup and teardown.

  5. Test Discovery: Cucumber relies on feature files to define tests, which can lead to slower test discovery and increased maintenance efforts as the number of feature files grows. Pytest, on the other hand, leverages Python's introspection capabilities to automatically discover tests, making it easier to maintain and scale test suites.

  6. Community and Ecosystem: Cucumber has a strong and active community, particularly in the domain of behavior-driven development, with a wide range of plugins and integrations. Pytest, on the other hand, benefits from the extensive Python ecosystem, allowing for easy integration with other tools and libraries used in the development process.

In summary, Cucumber and Pytest differ in their language choices, test organization approaches, execution models, fixture management capabilities, test discovery methods, and community support. The choice between the two frameworks largely depends on the specific needs and preferences of the development team.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Cucumber
Cucumber
pytest
pytest

Cucumber is a tool that supports Behaviour-Driven Development (BDD) - a software development process that aims to enhance software quality and reduce maintenance costs.

A framework makes it easy to write small tests, yet scales to support complex functional testing for applications and libraries. It is a mature full-featured Python testing tool.

-
Auto-discovery; Modular fixtures
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
13.2K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
2.9K
Stacks
1.4K
Stacks
4.0K
Followers
927
Followers
306
Votes
36
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 20
    Simple Syntax
  • 8
    Simple usage
  • 5
    Huge community
  • 3
    Nice report
No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available
PyCharm
PyCharm

What are some alternatives to Cucumber, pytest?

Robot Framework

Robot Framework

It is a generic test automation framework for acceptance testing and acceptance test-driven development. It has easy-to-use tabular test data syntax and it utilizes the keyword-driven testing approach. Its testing capabilities can be extended by test libraries implemented either with Python or Java, and users can create new higher-level keywords from existing ones using the same syntax that is used for creating test cases.

Karate DSL

Karate DSL

Combines API test-automation, mocks and performance-testing into a single, unified framework. The BDD syntax popularized by Cucumber is language-neutral, and easy for even non-programmers. Besides powerful JSON & XML assertions, you can run tests in parallel for speed - which is critical for HTTP API testing.

TestCafe

TestCafe

It is a pure node.js end-to-end solution for testing web apps. It takes care of all the stages: starting browsers, running tests, gathering test results and generating reports.

Spock Framework

Spock Framework

It is a testing and specification framework for Java and Groovy applications. What makes it stand out from the crowd is its beautiful and highly expressive specification language. It is compatible with most IDEs, build tools, and continuous integration servers.

Selenide

Selenide

It is a library for writing concise, readable, boilerplate-free tests in Java using Selenium WebDriver.

Capybara

Capybara

Capybara helps you test web applications by simulating how a real user would interact with your app. It is agnostic about the driver running your tests and comes with Rack::Test and Selenium support built in. WebKit is supported through an external gem.

PHPUnit

PHPUnit

PHPUnit is a programmer-oriented testing framework for PHP. It is an instance of the xUnit architecture for unit testing frameworks.

Detox

Detox

High velocity native mobile development requires us to adopt continuous integration workflows, which means our reliance on manual QA has to drop significantly. It tests your mobile app while it's running in a real device/simulator, interacting with it just like a real user.

Imagium

Imagium

Imagium provides AI based visual testing solution for various forms of testing. It makes the job easier for QA Automation, Mobile Testers, DevOps and Compliance teams. Imagium is easy to integrate with any programing language

Codeception

Codeception

Full-stack testing framework for PHP. Run browsers tests, framework tests, APIs tests, unit tests with ease.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana