Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Cucumber

982
926
+ 1
36
pytest

2K
303
+ 1
0
Add tool

Cucumber vs pytest: What are the differences?

Key Differences between Cucumber and Pytest

Cucumber and Pytest are two popular testing frameworks used in software development. While both frameworks aim to simplify the process of writing and running tests, there are several key differences between them.

  1. Language: Cucumber is primarily used with the Gherkin language, a simple and human-readable format that allows for collaboration between technical and non-technical stakeholders. Pytest, on the other hand, is based on Python and offers a more traditional approach to test automation with its vast ecosystem and easy integration with other tools.

  2. Test Organization: Cucumber encourages behavior-driven development (BDD), with tests written in a step-based approach that aligns with the Given-When-Then structure. Pytest, on the other hand, allows for more flexibility in test organization, allowing developers to structure tests in a way that makes sense for their specific project requirements.

  3. Test Execution: Cucumber executes tests in a sequential manner, running each step of the scenario and reporting the results at the end. Pytest, on the other hand, follows a modular approach where tests can be executed independently, allowing for parallel execution and faster overall test execution time.

  4. Fixture Management: Cucumber offers limited support for fixtures, relying more on the Given-When-Then structure to set up and tear down test environments. Pytest, on the other hand, provides a robust fixture management system that allows for more fine-grained control over the test environment setup and teardown.

  5. Test Discovery: Cucumber relies on feature files to define tests, which can lead to slower test discovery and increased maintenance efforts as the number of feature files grows. Pytest, on the other hand, leverages Python's introspection capabilities to automatically discover tests, making it easier to maintain and scale test suites.

  6. Community and Ecosystem: Cucumber has a strong and active community, particularly in the domain of behavior-driven development, with a wide range of plugins and integrations. Pytest, on the other hand, benefits from the extensive Python ecosystem, allowing for easy integration with other tools and libraries used in the development process.

In summary, Cucumber and Pytest differ in their language choices, test organization approaches, execution models, fixture management capabilities, test discovery methods, and community support. The choice between the two frameworks largely depends on the specific needs and preferences of the development team.

Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
Learn More
Pros of Cucumber
Pros of pytest
  • 20
    Simple Syntax
  • 8
    Simple usage
  • 5
    Huge community
  • 3
    Nice report
    Be the first to leave a pro

    Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

    - No public GitHub repository available -

    What is Cucumber?

    Cucumber is a tool that supports Behaviour-Driven Development (BDD) - a software development process that aims to enhance software quality and reduce maintenance costs.

    What is pytest?

    A framework makes it easy to write small tests, yet scales to support complex functional testing for applications and libraries. It is a mature full-featured Python testing tool.

    Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

    What companies use Cucumber?
    What companies use pytest?
    Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
    Learn More

    Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

    What tools integrate with Cucumber?
    What tools integrate with pytest?

    Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

    What are some alternatives to Cucumber and pytest?
    Selenium
    Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that. Boring web-based administration tasks can (and should!) also be automated as well.
    RSpec
    Behaviour Driven Development for Ruby. Making TDD Productive and Fun.
    TestNG
    It is a testing framework designed to simplify a broad range of testing needs, it covers all categories of tests: unit, functional, end-to-end, integration, etc.Run your tests in arbitrarily big thread pools with various policies available (all methods in their own thread, one thread per test class, etc.
    JUnit
    JUnit is a simple framework to write repeatable tests. It is an instance of the xUnit architecture for unit testing frameworks.
    Celery
    Celery is an asynchronous task queue/job queue based on distributed message passing. It is focused on real-time operation, but supports scheduling as well.
    See all alternatives