StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Testing Frameworks
  4. Testing Frameworks
  5. Cucumber vs Testsigma

Cucumber vs Testsigma

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Cucumber
Cucumber
Stacks1.4K
Followers927
Votes36
Testsigma
Testsigma
Stacks8
Followers29
Votes0

Cucumber vs Testsigma: What are the differences?

Introduction

When it comes to automated testing, two popular tools in the market are Cucumber and Testsigma. Both tools are widely used for their ease of use and efficiency in testing applications. However, there are key differences between the two that developers and testers should be aware of before choosing the right tool for their project.

  1. Language Support: Cucumber primarily supports Behavior Driven Development (BDD) using Gherkin syntax, which is plain English. On the other hand, Testsigma supports various programming languages such as Java, Python, and JavaScript, making it more versatile for developers with different language preferences.

  2. Reusability of Test Scenarios: In Cucumber, test scenarios can be reused across multiple features, making it efficient for maintaining and running tests. Testsigma, on the other hand, offers a feature called "flow design" that allows for reusability through modularization, making it easier to manage and maintain test scenarios.

  3. Integration with CI/CD Tools: Cucumber integrates well with popular Continuous Integration/Continuous Deployment (CI/CD) tools like Jenkins and Bamboo, making it seamless to incorporate automated testing into the development pipeline. Testsigma also offers integrations with CI/CD tools, but it provides a more user-friendly interface for setting up and managing these integrations.

  4. Parallel Test Execution: Cucumber does not have built-in support for parallel test execution out of the box, which can be a limitation for faster test runs on multiple environments. Testsigma, on the other hand, provides native support for parallel test execution, allowing for quicker feedback on test results across different environments.

  5. AI-driven Test Automation: One of the standout features of Testsigma is its AI-driven test automation capabilities, which help in self-healing tests, smart locators, and automatic maintenance of test scripts. Cucumber lacks these AI-driven features, making test maintenance manual and time-consuming in comparison.

  6. Community Support: Cucumber has a large and active community of users and contributors, providing a wealth of resources and support for developers and testers using the tool. While Testsigma also has a growing community, it may not be as extensive as Cucumber's, which could impact the availability of resources and solutions for users.

In Summary, while both Cucumber and Testsigma are powerful tools for automated testing, developers need to consider factors such as language support, reusability of test scenarios, integration with CI/CD tools, parallel test execution, AI-driven capabilities, and community support when choosing the right tool for their testing needs.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Cucumber
Cucumber
Testsigma
Testsigma

Cucumber is a tool that supports Behaviour-Driven Development (BDD) - a software development process that aims to enhance software quality and reduce maintenance costs.

A Unified platform for Web, Mobile apps and API services' Automated Testing, It is test automation ecosystem with all the essential elements required for Agile & Continuous Delivery teams. Automated tests are written in simple English & involves no complex coding but with the flexibility that enterprise teams need. The tests can be run in parallel on thousands of device/OS/browser combos and physical mobile devices on a massive device cloud as well as on your local machines. It lets you drill down to specific test environments and identify what failed and why.

-
AI-Driven Maintenance; Automated Regression Testing; Automated Data-Driven Testing; Automated Cross-Browser Testing; Automated Web Application Testing; Automated Mobile Apps(Android & iOS)Testing; Automated Web Services Testing; Reusable Step Groups; Test Data Management; Activity, history of your tests; Centralized Object/Element Repository; Global Test Data Management; Custom Functions; Parallel Test Execution; Cross-Platform Testing; Massive Real devices' cloud; Local Test Executions; Schedulers; Comprehensive Visual Reports; Integration with CI/CD tools, Collaboration tools; Test Management; Requirements Management; Team Collaboration; Test Development Trend; Version Control; Automatic Bug Reporting; Email and Slack Notifications
Statistics
Stacks
1.4K
Stacks
8
Followers
927
Followers
29
Votes
36
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 20
    Simple Syntax
  • 8
    Simple usage
  • 5
    Huge community
  • 3
    Nice report
No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available
Linux
Linux
iOS
iOS
Jenkins
Jenkins
Slack
Slack
BrowserStack
BrowserStack
Android OS
Android OS
CircleCI
CircleCI
Sauce Labs
Sauce Labs
Jira
Jira
Microsoft Edge
Microsoft Edge

What are some alternatives to Cucumber, Testsigma?

Robot Framework

Robot Framework

It is a generic test automation framework for acceptance testing and acceptance test-driven development. It has easy-to-use tabular test data syntax and it utilizes the keyword-driven testing approach. Its testing capabilities can be extended by test libraries implemented either with Python or Java, and users can create new higher-level keywords from existing ones using the same syntax that is used for creating test cases.

Karate DSL

Karate DSL

Combines API test-automation, mocks and performance-testing into a single, unified framework. The BDD syntax popularized by Cucumber is language-neutral, and easy for even non-programmers. Besides powerful JSON & XML assertions, you can run tests in parallel for speed - which is critical for HTTP API testing.

TestCafe

TestCafe

It is a pure node.js end-to-end solution for testing web apps. It takes care of all the stages: starting browsers, running tests, gathering test results and generating reports.

Spock Framework

Spock Framework

It is a testing and specification framework for Java and Groovy applications. What makes it stand out from the crowd is its beautiful and highly expressive specification language. It is compatible with most IDEs, build tools, and continuous integration servers.

Selenide

Selenide

It is a library for writing concise, readable, boilerplate-free tests in Java using Selenium WebDriver.

Capybara

Capybara

Capybara helps you test web applications by simulating how a real user would interact with your app. It is agnostic about the driver running your tests and comes with Rack::Test and Selenium support built in. WebKit is supported through an external gem.

PHPUnit

PHPUnit

PHPUnit is a programmer-oriented testing framework for PHP. It is an instance of the xUnit architecture for unit testing frameworks.

Detox

Detox

High velocity native mobile development requires us to adopt continuous integration workflows, which means our reliance on manual QA has to drop significantly. It tests your mobile app while it's running in a real device/simulator, interacting with it just like a real user.

Imagium

Imagium

Imagium provides AI based visual testing solution for various forms of testing. It makes the job easier for QA Automation, Mobile Testers, DevOps and Compliance teams. Imagium is easy to integrate with any programing language

Codeception

Codeception

Full-stack testing framework for PHP. Run browsers tests, framework tests, APIs tests, unit tests with ease.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana