Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
CyberArk vs Vault: What are the differences?
Introduction
This markdown code provides a comparison between CyberArk and Vault, outlining the key differences between these two security solutions.
Architecture: CyberArk follows a client-server architecture, where a central server manages the privileged accounts and access to them. In contrast, Vault operates using a server-cluster architecture, distributing secrets across several nodes and employing a decentralized approach to management.
Secrets Management: While both CyberArk and Vault offer secrets management capabilities, they differ in their approaches. CyberArk primarily focuses on managing privileged account credentials and offers comprehensive privileged access and session management features. Vault, on the other hand, is a broader secrets management tool, which includes features like dynamic secrets generation, secure key-value stores, and encryption-as-a-service.
Open Source vs. Proprietary: Vault is an open-source solution developed by HashiCorp, while CyberArk is a proprietary commercial product. The open-source nature of Vault allows for a more transparent and community-driven development process, making it attractive to organizations that prefer open-source technology.
Scalability and Performance: CyberArk is known for its scalability and robust performance, particularly when it comes to large-scale enterprise deployments. Vault, on the other hand, offers excellent scalability and performance, thanks to its distributed architecture and ability to handle high throughput.
Integration and Ecosystem: CyberArk has established itself as a market leader in the Privileged Access Management (PAM) space and provides a wide range of integrations with various systems, including popular third-party security solutions. Vault, being an open-source tool, benefits from a vibrant ecosystem of plugins and integrations, allowing it to integrate with an extensive array of tools and platforms.
Ease of Use: CyberArk offers a user-friendly interface and a comprehensive set of management tools, making it relatively straightforward to operate. Vault, while equally powerful, may require a higher level of technical expertise and familiarity with command-line interfaces due to its open-source nature.
In summary, CyberArk and Vault differ in their architecture, focus on secrets management, license type, scalability, integrations, and ease of use. CyberArk is widely recognized for its enterprise-grade privileged access management capabilities, while Vault's open-source nature and broader feature set make it appealing to organizations seeking a flexible and customizable secrets management solution.
Pros of CyberArk
Pros of Vault
- Secure17
- Variety of Secret Backends13
- Very easy to set up and use11
- Dynamic secret generation8
- AuditLog5
- Privilege Access Management3
- Leasing and Renewal3
- Easy to integrate with2
- Open Source2
- Consol integration2
- Handles secret sprawl2
- Variety of Auth Backends2
- Multicloud1