Cypress vs Juniper

Overview

Cypress

Stacks3.5K

Followers2.0K

Votes115

GitHub Stars49.4K

Forks3.4K

Juniper

Stacks23

Followers15

Votes0

Cypress vs Juniper: What are the differences?

Cypress vs Juniper: Architecture and Language: Cypress is a JavaScript-based end-to-end testing framework that runs directly in the browser, while Juniper is a network operating system built on a Linux kernel. Cypress uses Mocha and Chai for testing, whereas Juniper operates on a Junos OS based command-line interface (CLI).
Cypress vs Juniper: Testing Capabilities: Cypress is primarily designed for front-end testing and can interact with all aspects of the application under test in real time. It enables easy stubbing and spying on network requests. On the other hand, Juniper focuses on network automation and management, providing extensive capabilities for configuring, monitoring, and troubleshooting network devices.
Cypress vs Juniper: Test Execution Speed: Cypress offers built-in parallelization, allowing tests to be distributed across multiple machines to speed up execution. It also has a fast test runner with automatic reloading. Juniper lacks parallel execution capabilities, and tests are executed sequentially, which may result in longer test durations for complex network scenarios.
Cypress vs Juniper: Integration and Support: Cypress integrates well with popular web technologies and frameworks like React, Vue, and Angular, enabling developers to easily write and execute tests. It also provides an extensive documentation and an active community for support. Juniper, on the other hand, integrates with various network devices and protocols but may require more specialized networking knowledge. It offers comprehensive technical documentation and a dedicated customer support network.
Cypress vs Juniper: Testability and Debugging: Cypress provides powerful debugging capabilities, including interactive test execution and real-time debugging tools. It also offers access to the application's internal state and automatically takes screenshots and videos for easy debugging. Juniper, being a network operating system, may have limited debugging options compared to Cypress.
Cypress vs Juniper: Cost and Licensing: Cypress is an open-source framework released under MIT License, allowing users to freely use and modify it for their testing needs. Juniper is a commercial network operating system that requires licensing and may involve additional costs for support and updates.

In Summary, Cypress and Juniper differ in their architecture and language, testing capabilities, test execution speed, integration and support, testability and debugging options, as well as cost and licensing.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Cypress, Juniper

Dane

Feb 7, 2020

Needs adviceon

Cypress

Jest

As we all know testing is an important part of any application. To assist with our testing we are going to use both Cypress and Jest. We feel these tools complement each other and will help us get good coverage of our code. We will use Cypress for our end to end testing as we've found it quite user friendly. Jest will be used for our unit tests because we've seen how many larger companies use it with great success.

836k views836k

Comments

Yildiz

testmanager/automation tester at medicalservice

May 12, 2020

Needs adviceon

AngularJS

TypeScript

Cypress

In the company I will be building test automation framework and my new company develops apps mainly using AngularJS/TypeScript. I was planning to build Protractor-Jasmine framework but a friend of mine told me about Cypress and heard that its users are very satisfied with it. I am trying to understand the capabilities of Cypress and as the final goal to differentiate these two tools. Can anyone advice me on this in a nutshell pls...

277k views277k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Cypress	Juniper
Cypress is a front end automated testing application created for the modern web. Cypress is built on a new architecture and runs in the same run-loop as the application being tested. As a result Cypress provides better, faster, and more reliable testing for anything that runs in a browser. Cypress works on any front-end framework or website.	It provides high-performance networking & cybersecurity solutions to service providers, enterprise companies & public sector organizations.
Time Travel; Debuggability; Automatic Waiting; Spies, Stubs, and Clocks; Network Traffic Control; Consistent Results; Screenshots and Videos	High-performance networking & cybersecurity solutions; Identity and Policy Control
Statistics
GitHub Stars 49.4K	GitHub Stars -
GitHub Forks 3.4K	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 3.5K	Stacks 23
Followers 2.0K	Followers 15
Votes 115	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 29 Open source 22 Great documentation 20 Simple usage 18 Fast 10 Cross Browser testing Cons 21 Cypress is weak at cross-browser testing 14 Switch tabs : Cypress can'nt support 12 No iFrame support 9 No multiple domain support 9 No page object support	No community feedback yet

What are some alternatives to Cypress, Juniper?

Mocha

Mocha is a feature-rich JavaScript test framework running on node.js and the browser, making asynchronous testing simple and fun. Mocha tests run serially, allowing for flexible and accurate reporting, while mapping uncaught exceptions to the correct test cases.

Jasmine

Jasmine is a Behavior Driven Development testing framework for JavaScript. It does not rely on browsers, DOM, or any JavaScript framework. Thus it's suited for websites, Node.js projects, or anywhere that JavaScript can run.

Jest

Jest provides you with multiple layers on top of Jasmine.

Let's Encrypt

It is a free, automated, and open certificate authority brought to you by the non-profit Internet Security Research Group (ISRG).

CodeceptJS

It is a modern end to end testing framework with a special BDD-style syntax. The test is written as a linear scenario of user's action on a site. Each test is described inside a Scenario function with I object passed into it.

Sqreen

Sqreen is a security platform that helps engineering team protect their web applications, API and micro-services in real-time. The solution installs with a simple application library and doesn't require engineering resources to operate. Security anomalies triggered are reported with technical context to help engineers fix the code. Ops team can assess the impact of attacks and monitor suspicious user accounts involved.

Instant 2FA

Add a powerful, simple and flexible 2FA verification view to your login flow, without making any DB changes and just 3 API calls.

Protractor

Protractor is an end-to-end test framework for Angular and AngularJS applications. Protractor runs tests against your application running in a real browser, interacting with it as a user would.

AVA

Even though JavaScript is single-threaded, IO in Node.js can happen in parallel due to its async nature. AVA takes advantage of this and runs your tests concurrently, which is especially beneficial for IO heavy tests. In addition, test files are run in parallel as separate processes, giving you even better performance and an isolated environment for each test file.

Ghost Inspector

It lets you create and manage UI tests that check specific functionality in your website or application. We execute these automated browser tests continuously from the cloud and alert you if anything breaks.

Related Comparisons

Cypress vs Juniper: What are the differences?

Cypress vs Juniper: Architecture and Language: Cypress is a JavaScript-based end-to-end testing framework that runs directly in the browser, while Juniper is a network operating system built on a Linux kernel. Cypress uses Mocha and Chai for testing, whereas Juniper operates on a Junos OS based command-line interface (CLI).
Cypress vs Juniper: Testing Capabilities: Cypress is primarily designed for front-end testing and can interact with all aspects of the application under test in real time. It enables easy stubbing and spying on network requests. On the other hand, Juniper focuses on network automation and management, providing extensive capabilities for configuring, monitoring, and troubleshooting network devices.
Cypress vs Juniper: Test Execution Speed: Cypress offers built-in parallelization, allowing tests to be distributed across multiple machines to speed up execution. It also has a fast test runner with automatic reloading. Juniper lacks parallel execution capabilities, and tests are executed sequentially, which may result in longer test durations for complex network scenarios.
Cypress vs Juniper: Integration and Support: Cypress integrates well with popular web technologies and frameworks like React, Vue, and Angular, enabling developers to easily write and execute tests. It also provides an extensive documentation and an active community for support. Juniper, on the other hand, integrates with various network devices and protocols but may require more specialized networking knowledge. It offers comprehensive technical documentation and a dedicated customer support network.
Cypress vs Juniper: Testability and Debugging: Cypress provides powerful debugging capabilities, including interactive test execution and real-time debugging tools. It also offers access to the application's internal state and automatically takes screenshots and videos for easy debugging. Juniper, being a network operating system, may have limited debugging options compared to Cypress.
Cypress vs Juniper: Cost and Licensing: Cypress is an open-source framework released under MIT License, allowing users to freely use and modify it for their testing needs. Juniper is a commercial network operating system that requires licensing and may involve additional costs for support and updates.

Cypress vs Juniper

Overview