Cypress vs SuperTest

Overview

SuperTest

Stacks1.9K

Followers102

Votes0

Cypress

Stacks3.5K

Followers2.0K

Votes115

GitHub Stars49.4K

Forks3.4K

Cypress vs SuperTest: What are the differences?

1. Cypress: Cypress is a modern end-to-end testing framework that provides a comprehensive set of tools and features for testing web applications. It allows developers to write tests in JavaScript and execute them directly in the browser, making it easy to debug and troubleshoot issues. One key difference of Cypress is its ability to automatically wait for network requests, eliminating the need for manual timeouts or delays in tests.
2. SuperTest: SuperTest, on the other hand, is a high-level API for testing HTTP servers in Node.js. It provides a simple and intuitive interface for making HTTP requests and asserting responses. Unlike Cypress, SuperTest is specifically designed for testing APIs and does not support testing of user interfaces or front-end components.
3. Cypress: Cypress offers a unique feature called "time-travel" which allows developers to interact with their application at any point in time during the test execution. This enables them to inspect and interact with elements as they change over time, making it easier to debug and troubleshoot issues. SuperTest, on the other hand, does not have this capability as it focuses solely on testing HTTP servers.
4. SuperTest: SuperTest provides built-in assertion libraries that allow developers to easily validate the response received from the server. These assertion libraries include common methods such as .expect(), .toEqual(), and .toContain(), making it straightforward to verify the correctness of the API responses. In contrast, Cypress does not offer built-in assertion libraries and relies on external libraries like Chai or Jest for assertions.
5. Cypress: Cypress has a built-in feature for mocking and stubbing network requests, allowing developers to simulate different responses from the server without actually making the request. This is especially useful for testing different scenarios and handling edge cases. SuperTest, however, does not have native support for request mocking and stubbing and requires additional libraries or custom implementations.
6. SuperTest: SuperTest provides a fluent API for chaining multiple requests together, enabling developers to easily test complex workflows and scenarios involving multiple HTTP requests. This makes it easy to test and assert endpoints that depend on the behavior of other endpoints. Cypress, on the other hand, is primarily focused on testing the user interface and does not provide the same level of flexibility and ease of use for testing complex backend workflows.

In summary, Cypress is a comprehensive end-to-end testing framework that focuses on testing front-end web applications, while SuperTest is a high-level API specifically designed for testing HTTP servers in Node.js. Cypress offers features like automatic waiting for network requests and time-travel debugging, while SuperTest provides built-in assertion libraries and support for chaining multiple requests.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on SuperTest, Cypress

Dane

Feb 7, 2020

Needs adviceon

Cypress

Jest

As we all know testing is an important part of any application. To assist with our testing we are going to use both Cypress and Jest. We feel these tools complement each other and will help us get good coverage of our code. We will use Cypress for our end to end testing as we've found it quite user friendly. Jest will be used for our unit tests because we've seen how many larger companies use it with great success.

836k views836k

Comments

Yildiz

testmanager/automation tester at medicalservice

May 12, 2020

Needs adviceon

AngularJS

TypeScript

Cypress

In the company I will be building test automation framework and my new company develops apps mainly using AngularJS/TypeScript. I was planning to build Protractor-Jasmine framework but a friend of mine told me about Cypress and heard that its users are very satisfied with it. I am trying to understand the capabilities of Cypress and as the final goal to differentiate these two tools. Can anyone advice me on this in a nutshell pls...

277k views277k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

SuperTest	Cypress
It is a super-agent driven library for testing node.js HTTP servers using a fluent API. It provides a high-level abstraction for testing HTTP, while still allowing you to drop down to the lower-level API provided by superagent.	Cypress is a front end automated testing application created for the modern web. Cypress is built on a new architecture and runs in the same run-loop as the application being tested. As a result Cypress provides better, faster, and more reliable testing for anything that runs in a browser. Cypress works on any front-end framework or website.
HTTP assertions;Asynchronous;Promise support	Time Travel; Debuggability; Automatic Waiting; Spies, Stubs, and Clocks; Network Traffic Control; Consistent Results; Screenshots and Videos
Statistics
GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars 49.4K
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 3.4K
Stacks 1.9K	Stacks 3.5K
Followers 102	Followers 2.0K
Votes 0	Votes 115
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet	Pros 29 Open source 22 Great documentation 20 Simple usage 18 Fast 10 Cross Browser testing Cons 21 Cypress is weak at cross-browser testing 14 Switch tabs : Cypress can'nt support 12 No iFrame support 9 No multiple domain support 9 No page object support

What are some alternatives to SuperTest, Cypress?

Mocha

Mocha is a feature-rich JavaScript test framework running on node.js and the browser, making asynchronous testing simple and fun. Mocha tests run serially, allowing for flexible and accurate reporting, while mapping uncaught exceptions to the correct test cases.

Jasmine

Jasmine is a Behavior Driven Development testing framework for JavaScript. It does not rely on browsers, DOM, or any JavaScript framework. Thus it's suited for websites, Node.js projects, or anywhere that JavaScript can run.

Jest

Jest provides you with multiple layers on top of Jasmine.

CodeceptJS

It is a modern end to end testing framework with a special BDD-style syntax. The test is written as a linear scenario of user's action on a site. Each test is described inside a Scenario function with I object passed into it.

Protractor

Protractor is an end-to-end test framework for Angular and AngularJS applications. Protractor runs tests against your application running in a real browser, interacting with it as a user would.

AVA

Even though JavaScript is single-threaded, IO in Node.js can happen in parallel due to its async nature. AVA takes advantage of this and runs your tests concurrently, which is especially beneficial for IO heavy tests. In addition, test files are run in parallel as separate processes, giving you even better performance and an isolated environment for each test file.

Ghost Inspector

It lets you create and manage UI tests that check specific functionality in your website or application. We execute these automated browser tests continuously from the cloud and alert you if anything breaks.

QUnit

QUnit is a powerful, easy-to-use JavaScript unit testing framework. It's used by the jQuery, jQuery UI and jQuery Mobile projects and is capable of testing any generic JavaScript code, including itself!

Sorry-cypress

Open-source, self-hosted alternative Cypress Dashboard.

Baretest

It is a fast and simple JavaScript test runner. It offers near-instant performance and a brainless API. It makes testing tolerable.

Related Comparisons

Cypress vs SuperTest: What are the differences?

1. Cypress: Cypress is a modern end-to-end testing framework that provides a comprehensive set of tools and features for testing web applications. It allows developers to write tests in JavaScript and execute them directly in the browser, making it easy to debug and troubleshoot issues. One key difference of Cypress is its ability to automatically wait for network requests, eliminating the need for manual timeouts or delays in tests.
2. SuperTest: SuperTest, on the other hand, is a high-level API for testing HTTP servers in Node.js. It provides a simple and intuitive interface for making HTTP requests and asserting responses. Unlike Cypress, SuperTest is specifically designed for testing APIs and does not support testing of user interfaces or front-end components.
3. Cypress: Cypress offers a unique feature called "time-travel" which allows developers to interact with their application at any point in time during the test execution. This enables them to inspect and interact with elements as they change over time, making it easier to debug and troubleshoot issues. SuperTest, on the other hand, does not have this capability as it focuses solely on testing HTTP servers.
4. SuperTest: SuperTest provides built-in assertion libraries that allow developers to easily validate the response received from the server. These assertion libraries include common methods such as .expect(), .toEqual(), and .toContain(), making it straightforward to verify the correctness of the API responses. In contrast, Cypress does not offer built-in assertion libraries and relies on external libraries like Chai or Jest for assertions.
5. Cypress: Cypress has a built-in feature for mocking and stubbing network requests, allowing developers to simulate different responses from the server without actually making the request. This is especially useful for testing different scenarios and handling edge cases. SuperTest, however, does not have native support for request mocking and stubbing and requires additional libraries or custom implementations.
6. SuperTest: SuperTest provides a fluent API for chaining multiple requests together, enabling developers to easily test complex workflows and scenarios involving multiple HTTP requests. This makes it easy to test and assert endpoints that depend on the behavior of other endpoints. Cypress, on the other hand, is primarily focused on testing the user interface and does not provide the same level of flexibility and ease of use for testing complex backend workflows.

Cypress vs SuperTest

Overview