StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Code Collaboration
  4. Code Collaboration Version Control
  5. Deployer vs GitLab

Deployer vs GitLab

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

GitLab
GitLab
Stacks63.4K
Followers54.5K
Votes2.5K
GitHub Stars0
Forks0
Deployer
Deployer
Stacks49
Followers74
Votes21
GitHub Stars10.9K
Forks1.5K

Deployer vs GitLab: What are the differences?

# Key Differences between Deployer and GitLab

Deployer and GitLab are both popular tools used in software development, but they have key differences that set them apart. Below are the main distinctions between Deployer and GitLab:

1. **Purpose**: Deployer is a deployment tool designed specifically for automating the deployment process of PHP applications, making it easier for developers to deploy code changes to servers. On the other hand, GitLab is a complete DevOps platform that not only offers version control with Git repositories but also includes features for CI/CD pipelines, issue tracking, and more.
   
2. **Workflow Integration**: Deployer is primarily focused on deployment tasks and integrating with various deployment workflows, ensuring smooth code deployment processes. GitLab, on the other hand, provides an all-in-one solution for managing the entire software development lifecycle, streamlining collaboration, testing, and deployment in a single platform.

3. **Version Control**: GitLab excels in version control capabilities, offering powerful features for branching, merging, and code review workflows within its Git repository management system. While Deployer does not directly handle version control, it can be integrated with version control systems to facilitate the deployment of changes.

4. **User Interface**: GitLab provides a user-friendly web interface that allows easy navigation through various project management tools, issue tracking, and CI/CD pipelines. In contrast, Deployer is more command-line driven and is often used by developers who prefer CLI interactions for deployment tasks.

5. **Community Support**: GitLab has a larger and active community of users and contributors who continuously improve the platform, providing extensive documentation, support, and resources for users. Deployer, while popular in the PHP community, may have a smaller community size and limited additional resources compared to GitLab.

6. **Scalability**: GitLab is designed to support large-scale enterprise projects, offering robust scalability options, high availability, and support for multiple teams working on complex software projects. Deployer, while efficient for smaller to medium-sized projects, may not be as scalable or comprehensive for enterprise-level deployments.

In Summary, Deployer is a specialized tool focusing on PHP deployment automation, while GitLab is a comprehensive DevOps platform encompassing version control, CI/CD pipelines, project management, and collaboration features for a complete software development lifecycle management.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on GitLab, Deployer

Anonymous
Anonymous

May 25, 2020

Decided

Gitlab as A LOT of features that GitHub and Azure DevOps are missing. Even if both GH and Azure are backed by Microsoft, GitLab being open source has a faster upgrade rate and the hosted by gitlab.com solution seems more appealing than anything else! Quick win: the UI is way better and the Pipeline is way easier to setup on GitLab!

624k views624k
Comments
Weverton
Weverton

CTO at SourceLevel

Jul 28, 2020

Review

Using an inclusive language is crucial for fostering a diverse culture. Git has changed the naming conventions to be more language-inclusive, and so you should change. Our development tools, like GitHub and GitLab, already supports the change.

SourceLevel deals very nicely with repositories that changed the master branch to a more appropriate word. Besides, you can use the grep linter the look for exclusive terms contained in the source code.

As the inclusive language gap may happen in other aspects of our lives, have you already thought about them?

944k views944k
Comments
Weverton
Weverton

CTO at SourceLevel

Aug 3, 2020

Review

Do you review your Pull/Merge Request before assigning Reviewers?

If you work in a team opening a Pull Request (or Merge Request) looks appropriate. However, have you ever thought about opening a Pull/Merge Request when working by yourself? Here's a checklist of things you can review in your own:

  • Pick the correct target branch
  • Make Drafts explicit
  • Name things properly
  • Ask help for tools
  • Remove the noise
  • Fetch necessary data
  • Understand Mergeability
  • Pass the message
  • Add screenshots
  • Be found in the future
  • Comment inline in your changes

Read the blog post for more detailed explanation for each item :D

What else do you review before asking for code review?

1.19M views1.19M
Comments

Detailed Comparison

GitLab
GitLab
Deployer
Deployer

GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.

A deployment tool written in PHP with support for popular frameworks out of the box

Manage git repositories with fine grained access controls that keep your code secure;Perform code reviews and enhance collaboration with merge requests;Each project can also have an issue tracker and a wiki;Used by more than 100,000 organizations, GitLab is the most popular solution to manage git repositories on-premises;Completely free and open source (MIT Expat license);Powered by Ruby on Rails
Simple setup process and a minimal learning curve;Ready to use recipes for most frameworks;Parallel execution without extensions;Something went wrong? Rollback to the previous release;Agentless, it's just SSH;Zero downtime deployments;
Statistics
GitHub Stars
0
GitHub Stars
10.9K
GitHub Forks
0
GitHub Forks
1.5K
Stacks
63.4K
Stacks
49
Followers
54.5K
Followers
74
Votes
2.5K
Votes
21
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 508
    Self hosted
  • 431
    Free
  • 339
    Has community edition
  • 242
    Easy setup
  • 240
    Familiar interface
Cons
  • 28
    Slow ui performance
  • 9
    Introduce breaking bugs every release
  • 6
    Insecure (no published IP list for whitelisting)
  • 2
    Built-in Docker Registry
  • 1
    Review Apps feature
Pros
  • 8
    Simply to use
  • 7
    Easy to customize
  • 6
    Easy setup
Integrations
No integrations available
Zend Framework
Zend Framework
Yii
Yii
New Relic
New Relic
Drupal
Drupal
WordPress
WordPress
Magento
Magento
Slack
Slack
CodeIgniter
CodeIgniter
Symfony
Symfony
Laravel
Laravel

What are some alternatives to GitLab, Deployer?

GitHub

GitHub

GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together.

Bitbucket

Bitbucket

Bitbucket gives teams one place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private Git repositories. Teams choose Bitbucket because it has a superior Jira integration, built-in CI/CD, & is free for up to 5 users.

Buddy

Buddy

Git platform for web and software developers with Docker-based tools for Continuous Integration and Deployment.

RhodeCode

RhodeCode

RhodeCode provides centralized control over distributed code repositories. Developers get code review tools and custom APIs that work in Mercurial, Git & SVN. Firms get unified security and user control so that their CTOs can sleep at night

AWS CodeCommit

AWS CodeCommit

CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.

Gogs

Gogs

The goal of this project is to make the easiest, fastest and most painless way to set up a self-hosted Git service. With Go, this can be done in independent binary distribution across ALL platforms that Go supports, including Linux, Mac OS X, and Windows.

Gitea

Gitea

Git with a cup of tea! Painless self-hosted all-in-one software development service, including Git hosting, code review, team collaboration, package registry and CI/CD. It published under the MIT license.

Cloud 66

Cloud 66

Cloud 66 gives you everything you need to build, deploy and maintain your applications on any cloud, without the headache of dealing with "server stuff". Frameworks: Ruby on Rails, Node.js, Jamstack, Laravel, GoLang, and more.

DeployBot

DeployBot

DeployBot makes it simple to deploy your work anywhere. You can compile or process your code in a Docker container on our infrastructure, and we'll copy it to your servers once everything has been successfully built.

Upsource

Upsource

Upsource summarizes recent changes in your repository, showing commit messages, authors, quick diffs, links to detailed diff views and associated code reviews. A commit graph helps visualize the history of commits, branches and merges in your repository.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana