Docker Compose vs Gatekeeper

Overview

Docker Compose

Stacks22.3K

Followers16.5K

Votes501

GitHub Stars36.4K

Forks5.5K

Gatekeeper

Stacks16

Followers18

Votes0

GitHub Stars4.0K

Forks824

Docker Compose vs Gatekeeper: What are the differences?

Networking: Docker Compose allows you to create custom networks for your services, enabling secure and isolated communication between containers. In contrast, Gatekeeper focuses on policy enforcement and access control for Kubernetes clusters, restricting network access based on predefined rules.
Resource Management: Docker Compose is primarily used for orchestrating containers at the development stage, facilitating easy setup and configuration. On the other hand, Gatekeeper focuses on managing Kubernetes resources, ensuring compliance with security policies and best practices within the cluster.
Scope: Docker Compose is suitable for smaller-scale projects where container orchestration is needed, while Gatekeeper is designed for enterprise-level Kubernetes deployments that require robust governance and compliance mechanisms.
Customization: Docker Compose offers more flexibility in defining container configurations and dependencies, allowing for greater customization based on specific project requirements. In comparison, Gatekeeper provides predefined policies and constraints that need to be adhered to, limiting the level of customization available.
Integration: Docker Compose seamlessly integrates with Docker Swarm and other Docker tools, providing a holistic container management solution. In contrast, Gatekeeper is specifically tailored for Kubernetes environments, offering deep integration with the Kubernetes API and ecosystem for enhanced cluster security and compliance.
Security Focus: While Docker Compose emphasizes container orchestration and management, Gatekeeper places a stronger emphasis on security aspects such as policy enforcement, access control, and compliance validation within Kubernetes clusters. This focus on security makes Gatekeeper a preferred choice for organizations with stringent security requirements in their containerized environments.

In Summary, Docker Compose and Gatekeeper differ in networking capabilities, resource management focus, scope, customization options, integration with other tools, and their emphasis on security within container environments.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Docker Compose	Gatekeeper
With Compose, you define a multi-container application in a single file, then spin your application up in a single command which does everything that needs to be done to get it running.	It is a simple to use, open-source, web-based tool to see the OPA Gatekeeper's policies deployed in your cluster and their status.
-	An extensible, parameterized policy library; Native Kubernetes CRDs for instantiating the policy library; Native Kubernetes CRDs for extending the policy library; Audit functionality
Statistics
GitHub Stars 36.4K	GitHub Stars 4.0K
GitHub Forks 5.5K	GitHub Forks 824
Stacks 22.3K	Stacks 16
Followers 16.5K	Followers 18
Votes 501	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 123 Multi-container descriptor 110 Fast development environment setup 79 Easy linking of containers 68 Simple yaml configuration 60 Easy setup Cons 9 Tied to single machine 5 Still very volatile, changing syntax often	No community feedback yet
Integrations
Docker	Kubernetes

What are some alternatives to Docker Compose, Gatekeeper?

Kubernetes

Kubernetes is an open source orchestration system for Docker containers. It handles scheduling onto nodes in a compute cluster and actively manages workloads to ensure that their state matches the users declared intentions.

Rancher

Rancher is an open source container management platform that includes full distributions of Kubernetes, Apache Mesos and Docker Swarm, and makes it simple to operate container clusters on any cloud or infrastructure platform.

Docker Swarm

Swarm serves the standard Docker API, so any tool which already communicates with a Docker daemon can use Swarm to transparently scale to multiple hosts: Dokku, Compose, Krane, Deis, DockerUI, Shipyard, Drone, Jenkins... and, of course, the Docker client itself.

Tutum

Tutum lets developers easily manage and run lightweight, portable, self-sufficient containers from any application. AWS-like control, Heroku-like ease. The same container that a developer builds and tests on a laptop can run at scale in Tutum.

Portainer

It is a universal container management tool. It works with Kubernetes, Docker, Docker Swarm and Azure ACI. It allows you to manage containers without needing to know platform-specific code.

Codefresh

Automate and parallelize testing. Codefresh allows teams to spin up on-demand compositions to run unit and integration tests as part of the continuous integration process. Jenkins integration allows more complex pipelines.

CAST.AI

It is an AI-driven cloud optimization platform for Kubernetes. Instantly cut your cloud bill, prevent downtime, and 10X the power of DevOps.

k3s

Certified Kubernetes distribution designed for production workloads in unattended, resource-constrained, remote locations or inside IoT appliances. Supports something as small as a Raspberry Pi or as large as an AWS a1.4xlarge 32GiB server.

Flocker

Flocker is a data volume manager and multi-host Docker cluster management tool. With it you can control your data using the same tools you use for your stateless applications. This means that you can run your databases, queues and key-value stores in Docker and move them around as easily as the rest of your app.

Kitematic

Simple Docker App management for Mac OS X

Related Comparisons

Docker Compose vs Gatekeeper: What are the differences?

Networking: Docker Compose allows you to create custom networks for your services, enabling secure and isolated communication between containers. In contrast, Gatekeeper focuses on policy enforcement and access control for Kubernetes clusters, restricting network access based on predefined rules.
Resource Management: Docker Compose is primarily used for orchestrating containers at the development stage, facilitating easy setup and configuration. On the other hand, Gatekeeper focuses on managing Kubernetes resources, ensuring compliance with security policies and best practices within the cluster.
Scope: Docker Compose is suitable for smaller-scale projects where container orchestration is needed, while Gatekeeper is designed for enterprise-level Kubernetes deployments that require robust governance and compliance mechanisms.
Customization: Docker Compose offers more flexibility in defining container configurations and dependencies, allowing for greater customization based on specific project requirements. In comparison, Gatekeeper provides predefined policies and constraints that need to be adhered to, limiting the level of customization available.
Integration: Docker Compose seamlessly integrates with Docker Swarm and other Docker tools, providing a holistic container management solution. In contrast, Gatekeeper is specifically tailored for Kubernetes environments, offering deep integration with the Kubernetes API and ecosystem for enhanced cluster security and compliance.
Security Focus: While Docker Compose emphasizes container orchestration and management, Gatekeeper places a stronger emphasis on security aspects such as policy enforcement, access control, and compliance validation within Kubernetes clusters. This focus on security makes Gatekeeper a preferred choice for organizations with stringent security requirements in their containerized environments.

Docker Compose vs Gatekeeper

Overview