StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Container Registry
  4. Container Tools
  5. Docker Compose vs Harbor

Docker Compose vs Harbor

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Docker Compose
Docker Compose
Stacks22.3K
Followers16.5K
Votes501
GitHub Stars36.4K
Forks5.5K
Harbor
Harbor
Stacks183
Followers185
Votes11
GitHub Stars26.8K
Forks5.0K

Docker Compose vs Harbor: What are the differences?

Introduction

Docker Compose and Harbor are both tools used in the containerization ecosystem, but they serve different purposes and have distinct features. Understanding their key differences is important in order to choose the right tool for specific needs.

  1. Orchestration vs. Container Registry: Docker Compose is an orchestration tool that allows users to define and run multi-container Docker applications, while Harbor is a container registry that provides a place to store and distribute container images.

  2. Deployment Flexibility: Docker Compose is primarily used for local development or staging environments, where it facilitates the deployment and management of multi-container applications on a single host. On the other hand, Harbor is designed for production use and enables the distribution of container images across multiple environments, making it suitable for deploying containerized applications across different clusters or cloud providers.

  3. Security and Access Control: Harbor provides advanced security features such as vulnerability scanning and image signing, which allow users to verify the authenticity and integrity of container images. It also offers fine-grained access control, enabling administrators to define user roles, permissions, and quotas. Docker Compose, on the other hand, does not provide built-in security features or access control as it focuses on simplifying the deployment and management of containers.

  4. Registry Management: Harbor includes additional features for managing container image repositories, such as replication and synchronization across multiple instances. It also supports image retention and garbage collection policies, allowing administrators to optimize storage usage. Docker Compose, being an orchestration tool, does not offer built-in registry management capabilities.

  5. UI and Web Interface: Harbor comes with a user-friendly web interface that provides an intuitive way to manage container images and access control settings. It offers a dashboard for monitoring the status of repositories and the health of images. Docker Compose, being a command-line tool, does not have a built-in web interface and is primarily operated through the command line.

  6. Extensibility and Integration: Docker Compose is highly extensible and can be integrated with various other tools and frameworks, such as monitoring systems, logging platforms, and service discovery mechanisms. Harbor, being a standalone container registry, is not as extensible and does not offer built-in integration with external systems.

In summary, Docker Compose is an orchestration tool for managing multi-container applications locally, while Harbor is a container registry intended for secure storage and distribution of container images across multiple environments. Docker Compose focuses on simplicity and flexibility in deployment, while Harbor provides advanced security features, access control, and additional functionalities specific to container image management.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Docker Compose
Docker Compose
Harbor
Harbor

With Compose, you define a multi-container application in a single file, then spin your application up in a single command which does everything that needs to be done to get it running.

Harbor is an open source cloud native registry that stores, signs, and scans container images for vulnerabilities. Harbor solves common challenges by delivering trust, compliance, performance, and interoperability. It fills a gap for organ

-
Multi-tenant content signing and validation;Image replication between instances;Extensible API and graphical UI;Security and vulnerability analysis;Identity integration and role-based access control;Internationalization
Statistics
GitHub Stars
36.4K
GitHub Stars
26.8K
GitHub Forks
5.5K
GitHub Forks
5.0K
Stacks
22.3K
Stacks
183
Followers
16.5K
Followers
185
Votes
501
Votes
11
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 123
    Multi-container descriptor
  • 110
    Fast development environment setup
  • 79
    Easy linking of containers
  • 68
    Simple yaml configuration
  • 60
    Easy setup
Cons
  • 9
    Tied to single machine
  • 5
    Still very volatile, changing syntax often
Pros
  • 4
    Good on-premises container registry
  • 1
    Perfect for Teams and Organizations
  • 1
    Nice UI
  • 1
    Container Replication
  • 1
    Supports LDAP/Active Directory
Integrations
Docker
Docker
Docker
Docker
Kubernetes
Kubernetes
Helm
Helm

What are some alternatives to Docker Compose, Harbor?

Kubernetes

Kubernetes

Kubernetes is an open source orchestration system for Docker containers. It handles scheduling onto nodes in a compute cluster and actively manages workloads to ensure that their state matches the users declared intentions.

Rancher

Rancher

Rancher is an open source container management platform that includes full distributions of Kubernetes, Apache Mesos and Docker Swarm, and makes it simple to operate container clusters on any cloud or infrastructure platform.

Docker Swarm

Docker Swarm

Swarm serves the standard Docker API, so any tool which already communicates with a Docker daemon can use Swarm to transparently scale to multiple hosts: Dokku, Compose, Krane, Deis, DockerUI, Shipyard, Drone, Jenkins... and, of course, the Docker client itself.

Tutum

Tutum

Tutum lets developers easily manage and run lightweight, portable, self-sufficient containers from any application. AWS-like control, Heroku-like ease. The same container that a developer builds and tests on a laptop can run at scale in Tutum.

Portainer

Portainer

It is a universal container management tool. It works with Kubernetes, Docker, Docker Swarm and Azure ACI. It allows you to manage containers without needing to know platform-specific code.

Codefresh

Codefresh

Automate and parallelize testing. Codefresh allows teams to spin up on-demand compositions to run unit and integration tests as part of the continuous integration process. Jenkins integration allows more complex pipelines.

CAST.AI

CAST.AI

It is an AI-driven cloud optimization platform for Kubernetes. Instantly cut your cloud bill, prevent downtime, and 10X the power of DevOps.

k3s

k3s

Certified Kubernetes distribution designed for production workloads in unattended, resource-constrained, remote locations or inside IoT appliances. Supports something as small as a Raspberry Pi or as large as an AWS a1.4xlarge 32GiB server.

Flocker

Flocker

Flocker is a data volume manager and multi-host Docker cluster management tool. With it you can control your data using the same tools you use for your stateless applications. This means that you can run your databases, queues and key-value stores in Docker and move them around as easily as the rest of your app.

Kitematic

Kitematic

Simple Docker App management for Mac OS X

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana