StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Container Registry
  4. Container Tools
  5. Docker Compose vs Jib

Docker Compose vs Jib

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Docker Compose
Docker Compose
Stacks22.3K
Followers16.5K
Votes501
GitHub Stars36.4K
Forks5.5K
Jib
Jib
Stacks17
Followers43
Votes2
GitHub Stars14.1K
Forks1.5K

Docker Compose vs Jib: What are the differences?

Introduction

In the world of containerization and building and deploying applications, Docker Compose and Jib are two popular tools that serve different purposes. Docker Compose is a tool that allows you to define and run multi-container Docker applications, while Jib is a Java containerizer for building optimized Docker and OCI images.

1. Deployment Methodology:

Docker Compose focuses on deploying applications through a YAML file that defines the services and their configurations, allowing for complex setups and configurations. On the other hand, Jib aims to simplify the build and deployment process by integrating directly with your build system, making it easier to create container images without the need for Dockerfiles.

2. Build Process:

With Docker Compose, developers typically write Dockerfiles to define the build process and then use Docker Compose to orchestrate the deployment of multiple containers. Jib, on the other hand, eliminates the need for Dockerfiles altogether by directly packaging the application and its dependencies into a container image during the build process.

3. Dependency Management:

Docker Compose relies on external tools and platforms (such as Docker Hub) for managing and resolving dependencies during the build and deployment process. In contrast, Jib handles dependency management internally by fetching dependencies from remote repositories and packaging them directly into the container image.

4. Ease of Use:

Docker Compose provides a robust and feature-rich solution for managing complex, multi-container applications. However, it requires a certain level of familiarity with Docker and the Docker Compose syntax. Jib, on the other hand, aims to simplify the process by seamlessly integrating with build tools such as Maven or Gradle, making it more accessible for Java developers.

5. Continuous Integration:

Docker Compose is commonly used in conjunction with continuous integration and deployment platforms to automate the build and deployment process. Jib, on the other hand, integrates directly with the build tools used in the CI/CD pipeline, making it easier to incorporate containerization into the existing development workflows.

6. Build Time vs Runtime:

Docker Compose focuses on the deployment and runtime aspect of containerization, allowing developers to define the runtime behavior of the containers. Jib, on the other hand, primarily addresses the build-time phase by streamlining the process of creating container images, ensuring optimized and reproducible builds.

In Summary, Docker Compose is a tool for managing multi-container Docker applications, while Jib is a Java containerizer that simplifies the build process by directly packaging the application and its dependencies.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Docker Compose, Jib

Michael
Michael

CEO at asencis Ltd

Jan 5, 2021

Needs advice

We develop rapidly with docker-compose orchestrated services, however, for production - we utilise the very best ideas that Kubernetes has to offer: SCALE! We can scale when needed, setting a maximum and minimum level of nodes for each application layer - scaling only when the load balancer needs it. This allowed us to reduce our devops costs by 40% whilst also maintaining an SLA of 99.87%.

272k views272k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Docker Compose
Docker Compose
Jib
Jib

With Compose, you define a multi-container application in a single file, then spin your application up in a single command which does everything that needs to be done to get it running.

Jib builds Docker and OCI images for your Java applications and is available as plugins for Maven and Gradle.

-
Fast - Deploy your changes fast. Jib separates your application into multiple layers, splitting dependencies from classes. Now you don’t have to wait for Docker to rebuild your entire Java application - just deploy the layers that changed.; Reproducible - Rebuilding your container image with the same contents always generates the same image. Never trigger an unnecessary update again.; Daemonless - Reduce your CLI dependencies. Build your Docker image from within Maven or Gradle and push to any registry of your choice. No more writing Dockerfiles and calling docker build/push.
Statistics
GitHub Stars
36.4K
GitHub Stars
14.1K
GitHub Forks
5.5K
GitHub Forks
1.5K
Stacks
22.3K
Stacks
17
Followers
16.5K
Followers
43
Votes
501
Votes
2
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 123
    Multi-container descriptor
  • 110
    Fast development environment setup
  • 79
    Easy linking of containers
  • 68
    Simple yaml configuration
  • 60
    Easy setup
Cons
  • 9
    Tied to single machine
  • 5
    Still very volatile, changing syntax often
Pros
  • 2
    No docker files to maintain
  • 0
    Native
  • 0
    Coder friendly with Maven and Gradle plugins
  • 0
    Build is faster than Docker
Integrations
Docker
Docker
Apache Maven
Apache Maven
Java
Java
Gradle
Gradle

What are some alternatives to Docker Compose, Jib?

Kubernetes

Kubernetes

Kubernetes is an open source orchestration system for Docker containers. It handles scheduling onto nodes in a compute cluster and actively manages workloads to ensure that their state matches the users declared intentions.

Rancher

Rancher

Rancher is an open source container management platform that includes full distributions of Kubernetes, Apache Mesos and Docker Swarm, and makes it simple to operate container clusters on any cloud or infrastructure platform.

Docker Swarm

Docker Swarm

Swarm serves the standard Docker API, so any tool which already communicates with a Docker daemon can use Swarm to transparently scale to multiple hosts: Dokku, Compose, Krane, Deis, DockerUI, Shipyard, Drone, Jenkins... and, of course, the Docker client itself.

Tutum

Tutum

Tutum lets developers easily manage and run lightweight, portable, self-sufficient containers from any application. AWS-like control, Heroku-like ease. The same container that a developer builds and tests on a laptop can run at scale in Tutum.

Portainer

Portainer

It is a universal container management tool. It works with Kubernetes, Docker, Docker Swarm and Azure ACI. It allows you to manage containers without needing to know platform-specific code.

Codefresh

Codefresh

Automate and parallelize testing. Codefresh allows teams to spin up on-demand compositions to run unit and integration tests as part of the continuous integration process. Jenkins integration allows more complex pipelines.

CAST.AI

CAST.AI

It is an AI-driven cloud optimization platform for Kubernetes. Instantly cut your cloud bill, prevent downtime, and 10X the power of DevOps.

k3s

k3s

Certified Kubernetes distribution designed for production workloads in unattended, resource-constrained, remote locations or inside IoT appliances. Supports something as small as a Raspberry Pi or as large as an AWS a1.4xlarge 32GiB server.

Flocker

Flocker

Flocker is a data volume manager and multi-host Docker cluster management tool. With it you can control your data using the same tools you use for your stateless applications. This means that you can run your databases, queues and key-value stores in Docker and move them around as easily as the rest of your app.

Kitematic

Kitematic

Simple Docker App management for Mac OS X

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana