Docker Compose vs Okteto

Overview

Docker Compose

Stacks22.3K

Followers16.5K

Votes501

GitHub Stars36.4K

Forks5.5K

Okteto

Stacks14

Followers42

Votes0

Docker Compose vs Okteto: What are the differences?

Deployment Method: Docker Compose is primarily focused on defining and running multi-container Docker applications, allowing developers to define a single YAML file to manage the services and networks of their application. On the other hand, Okteto is designed for developers to easily test and debug their applications directly in Kubernetes without the need to build Docker images or manage complex Kubernetes manifests.
Development Workflow: Docker Compose is suitable for local development environments, enabling developers to define services, networks, and volumes. Okteto, however, provides a seamless development experience by allowing developers to sync their local code changes directly to a running Kubernetes pod, enabling rapid iteration and testing in a Kubernetes environment.
Integrated Tools: Docker Compose includes a basic set of tools for managing multi-container applications on a single host, whereas Okteto offers a range of tools and features specifically designed to streamline the development process on Kubernetes, such as hot reloading, interactive debugging, and terminal access to running containers.
Supported Environments: While Docker Compose is compatible with Docker Engine, Okteto integrates directly with Kubernetes, making it a suitable choice for developers working with Kubernetes clusters. Okteto's focus on Kubernetes-native development tools provides a more seamless integration into Kubernetes workflows compared to Docker Compose.
Collaboration and Sharing: Docker Compose offers limited support for collaboration and sharing of development environments, while Okteto provides features that enhance collaboration among team members by allowing developers to easily share and reproduce development environments in Kubernetes through the use of Okteto Stacks.
Scalability: Docker Compose is mainly intended for local development and testing, whereas Okteto can be used for debugging, testing, and scaling applications in a Kubernetes context, offering a more comprehensive set of tools and features to facilitate development in a production-like environment.

In Summary, Docker Compose is tailored for managing multi-container applications locally, while Okteto streamlines development workflows on Kubernetes with features like seamless local-to-cluster integration and collaboration tools.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Docker Compose	Okteto
With Compose, you define a multi-container application in a single file, then spin your application up in a single command which does everything that needs to be done to get it running.	An application development platform for Kubernetes that helps developers to quickly iterate and improve their test decision time by 4x.
-	Reduce integration efforts; Team Collaboration; Lighter-weight dev machines; Use your own tools
Statistics
GitHub Stars 36.4K	GitHub Stars -
GitHub Forks 5.5K	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 22.3K	Stacks 14
Followers 16.5K	Followers 42
Votes 501	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 123 Multi-container descriptor 110 Fast development environment setup 79 Easy linking of containers 68 Simple yaml configuration 60 Easy setup Cons 9 Tied to single machine 5 Still very volatile, changing syntax often	No community feedback yet
Integrations
Docker	Docker Kubernetes

What are some alternatives to Docker Compose, Okteto?

Kubernetes

Kubernetes is an open source orchestration system for Docker containers. It handles scheduling onto nodes in a compute cluster and actively manages workloads to ensure that their state matches the users declared intentions.

Rancher

Rancher is an open source container management platform that includes full distributions of Kubernetes, Apache Mesos and Docker Swarm, and makes it simple to operate container clusters on any cloud or infrastructure platform.

Docker Swarm

Swarm serves the standard Docker API, so any tool which already communicates with a Docker daemon can use Swarm to transparently scale to multiple hosts: Dokku, Compose, Krane, Deis, DockerUI, Shipyard, Drone, Jenkins... and, of course, the Docker client itself.

Tutum

Tutum lets developers easily manage and run lightweight, portable, self-sufficient containers from any application. AWS-like control, Heroku-like ease. The same container that a developer builds and tests on a laptop can run at scale in Tutum.

Portainer

It is a universal container management tool. It works with Kubernetes, Docker, Docker Swarm and Azure ACI. It allows you to manage containers without needing to know platform-specific code.

Codefresh

Automate and parallelize testing. Codefresh allows teams to spin up on-demand compositions to run unit and integration tests as part of the continuous integration process. Jenkins integration allows more complex pipelines.

CAST.AI

It is an AI-driven cloud optimization platform for Kubernetes. Instantly cut your cloud bill, prevent downtime, and 10X the power of DevOps.

k3s

Certified Kubernetes distribution designed for production workloads in unattended, resource-constrained, remote locations or inside IoT appliances. Supports something as small as a Raspberry Pi or as large as an AWS a1.4xlarge 32GiB server.

Flocker

Flocker is a data volume manager and multi-host Docker cluster management tool. With it you can control your data using the same tools you use for your stateless applications. This means that you can run your databases, queues and key-value stores in Docker and move them around as easily as the rest of your app.

Kitematic

Simple Docker App management for Mac OS X

Related Comparisons

Docker Compose vs Okteto: What are the differences?

Deployment Method: Docker Compose is primarily focused on defining and running multi-container Docker applications, allowing developers to define a single YAML file to manage the services and networks of their application. On the other hand, Okteto is designed for developers to easily test and debug their applications directly in Kubernetes without the need to build Docker images or manage complex Kubernetes manifests.
Development Workflow: Docker Compose is suitable for local development environments, enabling developers to define services, networks, and volumes. Okteto, however, provides a seamless development experience by allowing developers to sync their local code changes directly to a running Kubernetes pod, enabling rapid iteration and testing in a Kubernetes environment.
Integrated Tools: Docker Compose includes a basic set of tools for managing multi-container applications on a single host, whereas Okteto offers a range of tools and features specifically designed to streamline the development process on Kubernetes, such as hot reloading, interactive debugging, and terminal access to running containers.
Supported Environments: While Docker Compose is compatible with Docker Engine, Okteto integrates directly with Kubernetes, making it a suitable choice for developers working with Kubernetes clusters. Okteto's focus on Kubernetes-native development tools provides a more seamless integration into Kubernetes workflows compared to Docker Compose.
Collaboration and Sharing: Docker Compose offers limited support for collaboration and sharing of development environments, while Okteto provides features that enhance collaboration among team members by allowing developers to easily share and reproduce development environments in Kubernetes through the use of Okteto Stacks.
Scalability: Docker Compose is mainly intended for local development and testing, whereas Okteto can be used for debugging, testing, and scaling applications in a Kubernetes context, offering a more comprehensive set of tools and features to facilitate development in a production-like environment.

Docker Compose vs Okteto

Overview