Docker Hub vs k3s

Overview

Docker Hub

Stacks224

Followers262

Votes7

k3s

Stacks97

Followers252

Votes16

Docker Hub vs k3s: What are the differences?

Key differences between Docker Hub and k3s

Orchestration Framework: One key difference between Docker Hub and k3s is that Docker Hub primarily focuses on container image management and distribution, while k3s is designed as a lightweight Kubernetes distribution with a built-in container runtime.
Resource Usage: Docker Hub tends to consume more resources as it includes not just the container runtime and orchestration tools, but also the registry service for storing images, whereas k3s is optimized for resource efficiency by offering a stripped-down version of Kubernetes tailored for smaller environments.
Minimum System Requirements: In terms of system requirements, Docker Hub can be more resource-intensive and demanding on the underlying infrastructure, making it more suitable for larger-scale deployments, while k3s is designed to run on edge devices and low-resource environments with minimal hardware requirements.
Accessibility and Ease of Use: Docker Hub is a centralized platform managed by Docker, providing a user-friendly interface for easily managing container images and accessing a vast repository of pre-built images, whereas k3s offers a streamlined setup process and simplifies Kubernetes deployment, especially for those looking for a lightweight and efficient solution.
Customization and Extensibility: While Docker Hub offers a comprehensive platform for container management, it has limitations in terms of extensibility and customization beyond the features provided by Docker, whereas k3s allows for greater customization and flexibility, enabling users to tailor their Kubernetes deployment to specific requirements.
Community and Support: Docker Hub benefits from a large and active community, providing a wealth of resources, tutorials, and support for users, while k3s, being a newer project, is rapidly gaining popularity and building its community around lightweight Kubernetes deployments, with growing support and contributions from the open-source community.

In Summary, Docker Hub and k3s differ in their focus, resource efficiency, system requirements, accessibility, customization options, and community support, catering to diverse needs and preferences in container management and orchestration.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Docker Hub	k3s
It is the world's easiest way to create, manage, and deliver your teams' container applications. It is the perfect home for your teams' applications.	Certified Kubernetes distribution designed for production workloads in unattended, resource-constrained, remote locations or inside IoT appliances. Supports something as small as a Raspberry Pi or as large as an AWS a1.4xlarge 32GiB server.
-	ARM64 and ARMv7 support; Simplified installation; SQLite3 support; etcd support; Automatic Manifest and Helm Chart management; containerd, CoreDNS, Flannel support
Statistics
Stacks 224	Stacks 97
Followers 262	Followers 252
Votes 7	Votes 16
Pros & Cons
Pros 2 Uses a very familiar collaboration model as GitHub, the 1 Security scanning available 1 Quickly creates organizations, add users or create grou 1 Allows users to set permissions to restrict access or s 1 Provides public and private repositories Cons 1 Lacks fine grain access control 1 Does not provide any insight into the registry usage 1 Lacks LDAP, SAML and OAuth support	Pros 6 Lightweight 4 Easy 2 Replication Controller 2 Scale Services 2 Open Source
Integrations
No integrations available	Kubernetes SQLite

What are some alternatives to Docker Hub, k3s?

Kubernetes

Kubernetes is an open source orchestration system for Docker containers. It handles scheduling onto nodes in a compute cluster and actively manages workloads to ensure that their state matches the users declared intentions.

Rancher

Rancher is an open source container management platform that includes full distributions of Kubernetes, Apache Mesos and Docker Swarm, and makes it simple to operate container clusters on any cloud or infrastructure platform.

Docker Compose

With Compose, you define a multi-container application in a single file, then spin your application up in a single command which does everything that needs to be done to get it running.

Docker Swarm

Swarm serves the standard Docker API, so any tool which already communicates with a Docker daemon can use Swarm to transparently scale to multiple hosts: Dokku, Compose, Krane, Deis, DockerUI, Shipyard, Drone, Jenkins... and, of course, the Docker client itself.

Tutum

Tutum lets developers easily manage and run lightweight, portable, self-sufficient containers from any application. AWS-like control, Heroku-like ease. The same container that a developer builds and tests on a laptop can run at scale in Tutum.

Portainer

It is a universal container management tool. It works with Kubernetes, Docker, Docker Swarm and Azure ACI. It allows you to manage containers without needing to know platform-specific code.

Codefresh

Automate and parallelize testing. Codefresh allows teams to spin up on-demand compositions to run unit and integration tests as part of the continuous integration process. Jenkins integration allows more complex pipelines.

CAST.AI

It is an AI-driven cloud optimization platform for Kubernetes. Instantly cut your cloud bill, prevent downtime, and 10X the power of DevOps.

Flocker

Flocker is a data volume manager and multi-host Docker cluster management tool. With it you can control your data using the same tools you use for your stateless applications. This means that you can run your databases, queues and key-value stores in Docker and move them around as easily as the rest of your app.

Kitematic

Simple Docker App management for Mac OS X

Related Comparisons

Docker Hub vs k3s: What are the differences?

Key differences between Docker Hub and k3s

Orchestration Framework: One key difference between Docker Hub and k3s is that Docker Hub primarily focuses on container image management and distribution, while k3s is designed as a lightweight Kubernetes distribution with a built-in container runtime.
Resource Usage: Docker Hub tends to consume more resources as it includes not just the container runtime and orchestration tools, but also the registry service for storing images, whereas k3s is optimized for resource efficiency by offering a stripped-down version of Kubernetes tailored for smaller environments.
Minimum System Requirements: In terms of system requirements, Docker Hub can be more resource-intensive and demanding on the underlying infrastructure, making it more suitable for larger-scale deployments, while k3s is designed to run on edge devices and low-resource environments with minimal hardware requirements.
Accessibility and Ease of Use: Docker Hub is a centralized platform managed by Docker, providing a user-friendly interface for easily managing container images and accessing a vast repository of pre-built images, whereas k3s offers a streamlined setup process and simplifies Kubernetes deployment, especially for those looking for a lightweight and efficient solution.
Customization and Extensibility: While Docker Hub offers a comprehensive platform for container management, it has limitations in terms of extensibility and customization beyond the features provided by Docker, whereas k3s allows for greater customization and flexibility, enabling users to tailor their Kubernetes deployment to specific requirements.
Community and Support: Docker Hub benefits from a large and active community, providing a wealth of resources, tutorials, and support for users, while k3s, being a newer project, is rapidly gaining popularity and building its community around lightweight Kubernetes deployments, with growing support and contributions from the open-source community.

Docker Hub vs k3s

Overview