StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Container Registry
  4. Container Tools
  5. Docker Hub vs Portainer

Docker Hub vs Portainer

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Docker Hub
Docker Hub
Stacks224
Followers262
Votes7
Portainer
Portainer
Stacks507
Followers842
Votes146

Docker Hub vs Portainer: What are the differences?

Introduction

Docker Hub and Portainer are both popular tools used in the containerization ecosystem. While both serve a similar purpose, there are key differences between the two. This markdown will outline and compare these differences.

  1. Container Orchestration vs Container Management: Docker Hub takes on the role of a registry for Docker images, providing a platform for publishing and sharing container images. On the other hand, Portainer is a container management tool that allows for easy container deployment, management, and monitoring across Docker hosts.

  2. User Interface: Docker Hub primarily operates through a web-based user interface that allows users to search for, pull, and push Docker images. Portainer, however, provides a more comprehensive and feature-rich graphical user interface (GUI) that offers a simplified and intuitive way to manage containers and Docker environments.

  3. Functionality and Extensibility: Docker Hub focuses on image storage and distribution, offering collaboration features, automated builds, and image versioning. Portainer, in addition to image management, provides a wide range of functionality for managing Docker containers, volumes, networks, and deploying container stacks. Portainer can also integrate with external tools and platforms, allowing for more extensive extensibility.

  4. Access Control and Security: Docker Hub provides access controls through repositories, allowing users to manage who can view and pull images. However, Docker Hub lacks granular access controls and fine-grained user management. Portainer, on the other hand, offers more robust access control and security features. It allows administrators to define roles and grants permissions at a more granular level, ensuring secure access to Docker environments.

  5. On-premises Deployment: Docker Hub is a cloud-based service that is primarily hosted and managed by Docker. Portainer, on the other hand, can be deployed both in the cloud and on-premises. This allows organizations to have greater control and customization over their container management infrastructure, making it a preferable choice for those who require more flexibility in their deployment options.

In summary, Docker Hub primarily focuses on being a registry for Docker images, while Portainer provides a comprehensive container management tool with a user-friendly interface. Portainer offers more functionality, extensibility, and access control options compared to Docker Hub. Additionally, Portainer allows for on-premises deployment, offering greater flexibility and customization.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Docker Hub
Docker Hub
Portainer
Portainer

It is the world's easiest way to create, manage, and deliver your teams' container applications. It is the perfect home for your teams' applications.

It is a universal container management tool. It works with Kubernetes, Docker, Docker Swarm and Azure ACI. It allows you to manage containers without needing to know platform-specific code.

-
Docker management; Docker UI; Docker cluster management; Swarm visualizer; Authentication; User Access Control; Docker container management; Docker service management; Docker overview; Docker console; Docker swarm status; Docker image management; Docker network management; Docker dashboard; Remote HTTP API; Automation
Statistics
Stacks
224
Stacks
507
Followers
262
Followers
842
Votes
7
Votes
146
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 2
    Uses a very familiar collaboration model as GitHub, the
  • 1
    Fairly inexpensive with usage based pricing
  • 1
    Allows users to set permissions to restrict access or s
  • 1
    Quickly creates organizations, add users or create grou
  • 1
    Security scanning available
Cons
  • 1
    Does not provide any insight into the registry usage
  • 1
    Lacks LDAP, SAML and OAuth support
  • 1
    Lacks fine grain access control
Pros
  • 36
    Simple
  • 27
    Great UI
  • 19
    Friendly
  • 12
    Easy to setup, gives a practical interface for Docker
  • 11
    Because it just works, super simple yet powerful
Integrations
No integrations available
Docker Swarm
Docker Swarm
Docker Secrets
Docker Secrets
Auth0
Auth0
Kubernetes
Kubernetes
Docker
Docker

What are some alternatives to Docker Hub, Portainer?

Kubernetes

Kubernetes

Kubernetes is an open source orchestration system for Docker containers. It handles scheduling onto nodes in a compute cluster and actively manages workloads to ensure that their state matches the users declared intentions.

Rancher

Rancher

Rancher is an open source container management platform that includes full distributions of Kubernetes, Apache Mesos and Docker Swarm, and makes it simple to operate container clusters on any cloud or infrastructure platform.

Docker Compose

Docker Compose

With Compose, you define a multi-container application in a single file, then spin your application up in a single command which does everything that needs to be done to get it running.

Docker Swarm

Docker Swarm

Swarm serves the standard Docker API, so any tool which already communicates with a Docker daemon can use Swarm to transparently scale to multiple hosts: Dokku, Compose, Krane, Deis, DockerUI, Shipyard, Drone, Jenkins... and, of course, the Docker client itself.

Tutum

Tutum

Tutum lets developers easily manage and run lightweight, portable, self-sufficient containers from any application. AWS-like control, Heroku-like ease. The same container that a developer builds and tests on a laptop can run at scale in Tutum.

Codefresh

Codefresh

Automate and parallelize testing. Codefresh allows teams to spin up on-demand compositions to run unit and integration tests as part of the continuous integration process. Jenkins integration allows more complex pipelines.

CAST.AI

CAST.AI

It is an AI-driven cloud optimization platform for Kubernetes. Instantly cut your cloud bill, prevent downtime, and 10X the power of DevOps.

k3s

k3s

Certified Kubernetes distribution designed for production workloads in unattended, resource-constrained, remote locations or inside IoT appliances. Supports something as small as a Raspberry Pi or as large as an AWS a1.4xlarge 32GiB server.

Flocker

Flocker

Flocker is a data volume manager and multi-host Docker cluster management tool. With it you can control your data using the same tools you use for your stateless applications. This means that you can run your databases, queues and key-value stores in Docker and move them around as easily as the rest of your app.

Kitematic

Kitematic

Simple Docker App management for Mac OS X

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana