Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Docker Swarm vs Nomad: What are the differences?
Docker Swarm vs Nomad
Docker Swarm and Nomad are both container orchestration tools that help manage and automate the deployment, scaling, and management of containers. While they serve a similar purpose, there are key differences between the two tools.
Architecture: Docker Swarm follows a swarm-mode architecture, where a swarm manager is responsible for managing and distributing workloads across a cluster of Docker nodes. On the other hand, Nomad follows a client-server architecture, where a Nomad server manages workloads across a cluster of Nomad clients.
Supported Container Runtimes: Docker Swarm is tightly integrated with the Docker ecosystem and supports only Docker containers as the runtime environment. In contrast, Nomad supports multiple container runtimes such as Docker, rkt, and even non-containerized workloads like virtual machines.
Scheduling Strategy: Docker Swarm uses a declarative scheduling strategy, where the user specifies the desired state of the swarm and Docker Swarm orchestrates the necessary actions to reach that state. Nomad, on the other hand, uses an imperative scheduling strategy, where the user directly schedules tasks and specifies the constraints and requirements for each task.
Service Discovery: Docker Swarm integrates with Docker's built-in service discovery mechanism, which allows services to discover and communicate with each other using service names. Nomad, on the other hand, requires external service discovery mechanisms like Consul for service discovery and communication.
Ecosystem Integration: Docker Swarm benefits from its tight integration with the Docker ecosystem, allowing seamless integration with other Docker tools and services. Nomad, while being independent of any specific ecosystem, provides a wide range of integrations with different tools and services, making it more flexible in terms of ecosystem choices.
Scalability: Docker Swarm is well-suited for small to medium-sized deployments, offering simplicity and ease of use. Nomad, on the other hand, is designed for large-scale and complex deployments, providing more advanced features such as multi-region support, federated clusters, and hierarchical scheduling.
In summary, Docker Swarm provides a simple and tightly integrated orchestration solution specifically for Docker containers, while Nomad offers a more flexible and scalable approach with support for multiple container runtimes and a wide range of integrations.
Hello, we have a bunch of local hosts (Linux and Windows) where Docker containers are running with bamboo agents on them. Currently, each container is installed as a system service. Each host is set up manually. I want to improve the system by adding some sort of orchestration software that should install, update and check for consistency in my docker containers. I don't need any clouds, all hosts are local. I'd prefer simple solutions. What orchestration system should I choose?
If you just want the basic orchestration between a set of defined hosts, go with Docker Swarm. If you want more advanced orchestration + flexibility in terms of resource management and load balancing go with Kubernetes. In both cases, you can make it even more complex while making the whole architecture more understandable and replicable by using Terraform.
Our whole DevOps stack consists of the following tools:
- GitHub (incl. GitHub Pages/Markdown for Documentation, GettingStarted and HowTo's) for collaborative review and code management tool
- Respectively Git as revision control system
- SourceTree as Git GUI
- Visual Studio Code as IDE
- CircleCI for continuous integration (automatize development process)
- Prettier / TSLint / ESLint as code linter
- SonarQube as quality gate
- Docker as container management (incl. Docker Compose for multi-container application management)
- VirtualBox for operating system simulation tests
- Kubernetes as cluster management for docker containers
- Heroku for deploying in test environments
- nginx as web server (preferably used as facade server in production environment)
- SSLMate (using OpenSSL) for certificate management
- Amazon EC2 (incl. Amazon S3) for deploying in stage (production-like) and production environments
- PostgreSQL as preferred database system
- Redis as preferred in-memory database/store (great for caching)
The main reason we have chosen Kubernetes over Docker Swarm is related to the following artifacts:
- Key features: Easy and flexible installation, Clear dashboard, Great scaling operations, Monitoring is an integral part, Great load balancing concepts, Monitors the condition and ensures compensation in the event of failure.
- Applications: An application can be deployed using a combination of pods, deployments, and services (or micro-services).
- Functionality: Kubernetes as a complex installation and setup process, but it not as limited as Docker Swarm.
- Monitoring: It supports multiple versions of logging and monitoring when the services are deployed within the cluster (Elasticsearch/Kibana (ELK), Heapster/Grafana, Sysdig cloud integration).
- Scalability: All-in-one framework for distributed systems.
- Other Benefits: Kubernetes is backed by the Cloud Native Computing Foundation (CNCF), huge community among container orchestration tools, it is an open source and modular tool that works with any OS.
Pros of Docker Swarm
- Docker friendly55
- Easy to setup46
- Standard Docker API40
- Easy to use38
- Native23
- Free22
- Clustering made easy13
- Simple usage12
- Integral part of docker11
- Cross Platform6
- Labels and annotations5
- Performance5
- Easy Networking3
- Shallow learning curve3
Pros of Nomad
- Built in Consul integration7
- Easy setup6
- Bult-in Vault integration4
- Built-in federation support3
- Self-healing2
- Autoscaling support2
- Bult-in Vault inegration1
- Stable1
- Simple1
- Nice ACL1
- Managable by terraform1
- Open source1
- Multiple workload support1
- Flexible1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Docker Swarm
- Low adoption9
Cons of Nomad
- Easy to start with3
- HCL language for configuration, an unpopular DSL1
- Small comunity1