Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Docker vs GraalVM: What are the differences?
Introduction
In this article, we will explore the key differences between Docker and GraalVM. Both Docker and GraalVM are widely used in the software development industry, but they have distinct characteristics and purposes.
Containerization Technology: Docker is primarily a containerization platform that allows you to package applications and all their dependencies into standardized units called containers. These containers can be easily deployed and run on any machine that has Docker installed. On the other hand, GraalVM is a high-performance runtime that provides support for multiple languages and allows you to compile applications into native executables or standalone binaries.
Isolation Level: Docker provides a higher level of isolation by encapsulating an application and its dependencies in a container. This ensures that the application runs consistently across different environments. In contrast, GraalVM uses ahead-of-time (AOT) compilation to produce native executables that have very low overhead and are highly optimized, but they do not provide the same level of isolation as Docker containers.
Compatibility: Docker containers are platform-agnostic and can run on any operating system or cloud platform that supports Docker. This makes it easy to deploy applications across different environments without worrying about compatibility issues. On the other hand, GraalVM supports multiple languages and can be used to compile applications for different platforms, but it may require additional configuration and adjustments to optimize performance on specific platforms.
Resource Utilization: Docker containers are lightweight and share the host machine's operating system kernel, which results in better resource utilization and scalability. Additionally, Docker provides built-in tools for managing and monitoring containers, making it easier to manage resources efficiently. In contrast, GraalVM's native executables eliminate the need for an additional runtime, resulting in reduced resource usage and faster startup times for applications.
Development Workflow: Docker simplifies the development workflow by providing a consistent environment for developers to build, test, and deploy applications. With Docker, developers can easily package their applications along with all the required dependencies into containers, ensuring consistent behavior across different development environments. GraalVM, on the other hand, offers the advantage of AOT compilation, which enables developers to create native executables that can be easily distributed and run without requiring the GraalVM runtime.
Supported Languages: Docker is language-agnostic and supports running applications written in any programming language, as long as the language runtime is available within the container. In contrast, GraalVM provides support for multiple programming languages, including Java, JavaScript, Python, Ruby, and R. GraalVM's polyglot capabilities allow developers to mix and match languages within the same application and leverage the high-performance optimizations provided by GraalVM.
In summary, Docker is primarily a containerization platform that offers isolated and consistent environments for running applications across different platforms, whereas GraalVM is a high-performance runtime that enables ahead-of-time compilation and provides support for multiple languages. Docker focuses on ease of deployment and scalability, while GraalVM emphasizes performance optimization and native executable generation.
lxd/lxc and Docker aren't congruent so this comparison needs a more detailed look; but in short I can say: the lxd-integrated administration of storage including zfs with its snapshot capabilities as well as the system container (multi-process) approach of lxc vs. the limited single-process container approach of Docker is the main reason I chose lxd over Docker.
Pros of Docker
- Rapid integration and build up823
- Isolation691
- Open source521
- Testability and reproducibility505
- Lightweight460
- Standardization218
- Scalable185
- Upgrading / downgrading / application versions106
- Security88
- Private paas environments85
- Portability34
- Limit resource usage26
- Game changer17
- I love the way docker has changed virtualization16
- Fast14
- Concurrency12
- Docker's Compose tools8
- Easy setup6
- Fast and Portable6
- Because its fun5
- Makes shipping to production very simple4
- Highly useful3
- It's dope3
- Very easy to setup integrate and build2
- HIgh Throughput2
- Package the environment with the application2
- Does a nice job hogging memory2
- Open source and highly configurable2
- Simplicity, isolation, resource effective2
- MacOS support FAKE2
- Its cool2
- Docker hub for the FTW2
- Super2
- Asdfd0
Pros of GraalVM
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Docker
- New versions == broken features8
- Unreliable networking6
- Documentation not always in sync6
- Moves quickly4
- Not Secure3