Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Docusaurus

239
413
+ 1
35
Gitbook

219
349
+ 1
10
Add tool

Docusaurus vs Gitbook: What are the differences?

Introduction:

Docusaurus and Gitbook are two popular documentation tools used to create and manage websites. Both platforms have their own set of features and benefits, catering to different needs. Understanding the key differences between Docusaurus and Gitbook can help you make an informed decision on which tool suits your requirements best.

1. Customization Options: Docusaurus provides a higher level of customization options compared to Gitbook. With Docusaurus, you have more control over the appearance and layout of your website. You can easily customize the theme, add plugins, and manipulate the site's structure to fit your specific needs. On the other hand, Gitbook has a more limited range of customization options, making it less flexible for advanced customization.

2. Hosting Options: Docusaurus allows you to host your documentation website on any static file hosting provider or on platforms like GitHub Pages or Vercel. This gives you the freedom to choose the hosting solution that best fits your requirements. Gitbook, on the other hand, provides its own hosting platform, which simplifies the deployment process but limits your choices when it comes to hosting providers.

3. Markdown Support: Both Docusaurus and Gitbook support Markdown for content creation. However, Docusaurus provides a richer Markdown support with additional features like custom Markdown components, enabling you to create more complex and customized content structures. Gitbook, while supporting Markdown, has a more basic implementation, which may limit the flexibility of your content creation.

4. Community and Ecosystem: Docusaurus has a larger and more active community compared to Gitbook. This means that you will find more resources, tutorials, and plugins developed by the community to enhance your Docusaurus experience. Gitbook, while still having a supportive community, doesn't have the same level of activity and resources as Docusaurus.

5. Versioning and Collaboration: Gitbook provides better support for versioning and collaboration workflows compared to Docusaurus. With Gitbook, you can easily manage different versions of your documentation, collaborate with team members, and track changes using Git version control. Docusaurus, while it supports versioning and collaboration, may require additional setup and configuration to achieve similar functionalities.

6. Popularity and Adoption: Docusaurus is gaining popularity rapidly and has been widely adopted by many companies and open-source projects. It has been designed and used by Facebook, which adds to its credibility and usage. Gitbook, though widely used, may not have the same level of adoption and community support as Docusaurus.

In Summary, Docusaurus offers more customization options, supports a wider range of hosting options, has a richer Markdown support, has a larger and more active community, while Gitbook provides better versioning and collaboration support and is widely adopted. Choose Docusaurus if you prioritize customization and flexibility, while Gitbook may be a better choice if you prioritize version control and collaboration features.

Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
Learn More
Pros of Docusaurus
Pros of Gitbook
  • 8
    Open Source
  • 7
    Self Hosted
  • 3
    Free to use
  • 3
    React
  • 3
    Easy customization
  • 3
    Jamstack
  • 3
    MDX
  • 3
    I18n
  • 2
    Versioning
  • 6
    Prueba
  • 4
    Integrated high-quality editor

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of Docusaurus
Cons of Gitbook
    Be the first to leave a con
    • 1
      No longer Git or Open
    • 1
      Just sync with GitHub

    Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

    - No public GitHub repository available -

    What is Docusaurus?

    Docusaurus is a project for easily building, deploying, and maintaining open source project websites.

    What is Gitbook?

    It is a modern documentation platform where teams can document everything from products, to APIs and internal knowledge-bases. It is a place to think and track ideas for you & your team.

    Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

    What companies use Docusaurus?
    What companies use Gitbook?
    Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
    Learn More

    Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

    What tools integrate with Docusaurus?
    What tools integrate with Gitbook?

    Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

    What are some alternatives to Docusaurus and Gitbook?
    Confluence
    Capture the knowledge that's too often lost in email inboxes and shared network drives in Confluence instead – where it's easy to find, use, and update.
    MkDocs
    It builds completely static HTML sites that you can host on GitHub pages, Amazon S3, or anywhere else you choose. There's a stack of good looking themes available. The built-in dev-server allows you to preview your documentation as you're writing it. It will even auto-reload and refresh your browser whenever you save your changes.
    VuePress
    A minimalistic static site generator with a Vue-powered theming system, and a default theme optimized for writing technical documentation. It was created to support the documentation needs of Vue's own sub projects.
    Hugo
    Hugo is a static site generator written in Go. It is optimized for speed, easy use and configurability. Hugo takes a directory with content and templates and renders them into a full html website. Hugo makes use of markdown files with front matter for meta data.
    Sphinx
    It lets you either batch index and search data stored in an SQL database, NoSQL storage, or just files quickly and easily — or index and search data on the fly, working with it pretty much as with a database server.
    See all alternatives