StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Platform as a Service
  4. Platform As A Service
  5. Dokku vs OpenShift

Dokku vs OpenShift

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Stacks1.6K
Followers1.4K
Votes517
GitHub Stars885
Forks510
Dokku
Dokku
Stacks180
Followers216
Votes69
GitHub Stars31.4K
Forks2.0K

Dokku vs OpenShift: What are the differences?

<Write Introduction here>
  1. Deployment Methods: Dokku is designed to be a simple and lightweight platform that utilizes Git push deployments, while OpenShift offers more flexibility with various deployment methods such as source-to-image (S2I), Docker Images, and Kubernetes-based deployments.
  2. Scaling: Dokku is more suitable for small to medium-sized applications as it lacks the robust scaling features provided by OpenShift, which allows for horizontal and vertical scaling of applications to meet increased demand without manual intervention.
  3. Community Support: OpenShift, being an enterprise-grade platform from Red Hat, has a larger community and professional support compared to Dokku, which is community-driven and may have limited support resources.
  4. Development Complexity: Dokku simplifies the development process by focusing on ease of use and straightforward deployment configurations, whereas OpenShift's advanced features and capabilities can result in a steeper learning curve for developers.
  5. Resource Management: OpenShift offers advanced resource management features such as monitoring, logging, and automation tools, while Dokku may require additional configurations or third-party tools for comprehensive resource management.
  6. Commercial Support: OpenShift provides paid commercial support options for enterprises that require SLA-backed support and services, while Dokku is primarily supported through community forums and documentation resources.

In Summary, Dokku is a lightweight and straightforward platform suitable for small projects, while OpenShift offers advanced capabilities and enterprise-grade support for larger-scale applications.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Dokku
Dokku

OpenShift is Red Hat's Cloud Computing Platform as a Service (PaaS) offering. OpenShift is an application platform in the cloud where application developers and teams can build, test, deploy, and run their applications.

It is an extensible, open source Platform as a Service that runs on a single server of your choice. It helps you build and manage the lifecycle of applications from building to scaling.

Built-in support for Node.js, Ruby, Python, PHP, Perl, and Java (the standard in today's Enterprise);OpenShift is extensible with a customizable cartridge functionality that allows developers to add any other language they wish. We've seen everything from Clojure to Cobol running on OpenShift;OpenShift supports frameworks ranging from Spring, to Rails, to Play;Autoscaling- OpenShift can scale your application by adding additional instances of your application and enabling clustering. Alternatively, you can manually scale the amount of resources with which your application is deployed when needed;OpenShift by Red Hat is built on open-source technologies (Red Hat Enterprise Linux- RHEL);One Click Deployment- Deploying to the OpenShift platform is as easy a clicking a button or entering a "Git push" command
Open source PAAS alternative to Heroku; No vendor lock-in; Getting started is extremely easy; Extensible & customizable
Statistics
GitHub Stars
885
GitHub Stars
31.4K
GitHub Forks
510
GitHub Forks
2.0K
Stacks
1.6K
Stacks
180
Followers
1.4K
Followers
216
Votes
517
Votes
69
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 99
    Good free plan
  • 63
    Open Source
  • 47
    Easy setup
  • 43
    Nodejs support
  • 42
    Well documented
Cons
  • 2
    Decisions are made for you, limiting your options
  • 2
    License cost
  • 1
    Behind, sometimes severely, the upstreams
Pros
  • 23
    Simple
  • 12
    Open Source
  • 11
    Free
  • 11
    Built on Docker
  • 4
    Git deploy
Integrations
No integrations available
Ubuntu
Ubuntu
Semaphore
Semaphore
Drone.io
Drone.io
CloudBees
CloudBees
Arch Linux
Arch Linux
GitLab CI
GitLab CI
Travis CI
Travis CI
CircleCI
CircleCI
GitHub Actions
GitHub Actions
Debian
Debian

What are some alternatives to Red Hat OpenShift, Dokku?

Heroku

Heroku

Heroku is a cloud application platform – a new way of building and deploying web apps. Heroku lets app developers spend 100% of their time on their application code, not managing servers, deployment, ongoing operations, or scaling.

Clever Cloud

Clever Cloud

Clever Cloud is a polyglot cloud application platform. The service helps developers to build applications with many languages and services, with auto-scaling features and a true pay-as-you-go pricing model.

Google App Engine

Google App Engine

Google has a reputation for highly reliable, high performance infrastructure. With App Engine you can take advantage of the 10 years of knowledge Google has in running massively scalable, performance driven systems. App Engine applications are easy to build, easy to maintain, and easy to scale as your traffic and data storage needs grow.

AWS Elastic Beanstalk

AWS Elastic Beanstalk

Once you upload your application, Elastic Beanstalk automatically handles the deployment details of capacity provisioning, load balancing, auto-scaling, and application health monitoring.

Render

Render

Render is a unified platform to build and run all your apps and websites with free SSL, a global CDN, private networks and auto deploys from Git.

Hasura

Hasura

An open source GraphQL engine that deploys instant, realtime GraphQL APIs on any Postgres database.

Cloud 66

Cloud 66

Cloud 66 gives you everything you need to build, deploy and maintain your applications on any cloud, without the headache of dealing with "server stuff". Frameworks: Ruby on Rails, Node.js, Jamstack, Laravel, GoLang, and more.

Jelastic

Jelastic

Jelastic is a Multi-Cloud DevOps PaaS for ISVs, telcos, service providers and enterprises needing to speed up development, reduce cost of IT infrastructure, improve uptime and security.

PythonAnywhere

PythonAnywhere

It's somewhat unique. A small PaaS that supports web apps (Python only) as well as scheduled jobs with shell access. It is an expensive way to tinker and run several small apps.

CapRover

CapRover

It is an extremely easy to use app/database deployment & web server manager for your NodeJS, Python, PHP, ASP.NET, Ruby, MySQL, MongoDB, Postgres, WordPress (and etc...) applications! It's blazingly fast and very robust as it uses Docker, nginx, LetsEncrypt and NetData under the hood behind its simple-to-use interface.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase