.NET Core vs Redwood

Overview

.NET Core

Stacks7.0K

Followers2.6K

Votes155

GitHub Stars21.7K

Forks4.9K

Redwood

Stacks28

Followers50

Votes6

.NET Core vs Redwood: What are the differences?

Platform Compatibility: One key difference between .NET Core and Redwood is their platform compatibility. .NET Core is a cross-platform framework, meaning it can run on Windows, macOS, and Linux, while Redwood is solely focused on web development, making it more limited in terms of platform support. This difference makes .NET Core a more versatile option for developers who need to build applications for various operating systems.
Language Support: Another significant difference is the language support provided by these frameworks. .NET Core supports a variety of languages such as C#, Visual Basic, and F#, while Redwood is primarily focused on JavaScript and TypeScript. This difference in language support can impact the developer's choice based on their preferred programming language and expertise.
Ecosystem and Community: .NET Core has a larger ecosystem and community compared to Redwood. This translates to a wider range of libraries, tools, and resources available for developers using .NET Core, making it easier to find solutions to problems and collaborate with other developers. Redwood, being a newer and more specialized framework, may have a smaller ecosystem, which could potentially limit the support available.
Performance: .NET Core is known for its performance optimization, making it a faster option for certain types of applications. Redwood, on the other hand, focuses more on developer experience and productivity, which may result in slightly lower performance compared to .NET Core for specific use cases. This difference in performance can be a crucial factor when choosing between the two frameworks for a particular project.

In Summary, the key differences between .NET Core and Redwood include platform compatibility, language support, ecosystem and community, and performance optimization.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on .NET Core, Redwood

Anonymous

Dec 16, 2019

Review

There has been a lot of buzz around having PostgreSQL for ASP.NET Core 3.1 web apps. But Configuring Identity Server 4 with PostgreSQL is a real challenge. I've made a simple video to configure the ASP.NET Core 3.1 based Web application that uses AngualrJS as front end with Single Page App capabilities with Identity Server 4 talking to the PostgreSQL database. Check out this Video tutorial on how to do that in detail http://bit.ly/2EkotL5 You can access the entire code here on github http://bit.ly/35okpFj

210k views210k

Comments

Jakub

Jan 2, 2020

Decided

I was researching multiple high performance, concurent//parallel languages for the needs of authentication and authorization server, to be built on microservice architecture and Linux OS. Node.js with its asynchronous behavior and event loop suits the case best. Python Django & Flash turns to be slower and .NET Core & Framework wasn't the best choice for the Linux environment at the time (summer 2018).

I also tested Go lang and Rust, although they didn't meet the quick prototyping criteria as both languages are young and lacking libraries or battle-tested ORM.

377k views377k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

.NET Core	Redwood
Cross-platform (supporting Windows, macOS, and Linux) and can be used to build device, cloud, and IoT applications.	It is an opinionated, full-stack, serverless web application framework that will allow you to build and deploy JAMstack applications with ease. Imagine a React frontend, statically delivered by CDN, that talks via GraphQL to your backend running on AWS Lambdas around the world, all deployable with just a git push—that's Redwood.
Cross-platform; Consistent across architectures; Command-line tools; Flexible deployment; Compatible with .NET Framework, Xamarin and Mono, via .NET Standard; Open source; Supported by Microsoft	Opinionated defaults for formatting, file organization, webpack, Babel, and more; Simple but powerful routing (all routes defined in one file) with dynamic (typed) parameters, constraints, and named route functions (to generate correct URLs); Automatic page-based code-splitting; Boilerplate-less GraphQL API construction; Cells: a declarative way to fetch data from the backend API; Generators for pages, layouts, cells, SDL, services, etc; Scaffold generator for CRUD operations around a specific DB table; Forms with easy client- and/or server-side validation and error handling; Hot module replacement (HMR) for faster development; Database migrations (via Prisma 2); First class JAMstack-style deployment to Netlify
Statistics
GitHub Stars 21.7K	GitHub Stars -
GitHub Forks 4.9K	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 7.0K	Stacks 28
Followers 2.6K	Followers 50
Votes 155	Votes 6
Pros & Cons
Pros 30 Perfect to do any backend ( and a fast frontend) stuff 27 Fast 26 Cross-platform 25 Great performance 18 All Platform (Mac, Linux, Windows)	Pros 2 Cells 2 React+Prisma+GraphQL 1 Storybook integrated development 1 Easy setup + generators
Integrations
Linux C# Visual Studio Code Sublime Text .NET Visual Studio ASP.NET Vim Visual Basic F#	React AWS Lambda Netlify GraphQL

What are some alternatives to .NET Core, Redwood?

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Android SDK

Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.

Related Comparisons

.NET Core vs Redwood: What are the differences?

Platform Compatibility: One key difference between .NET Core and Redwood is their platform compatibility. .NET Core is a cross-platform framework, meaning it can run on Windows, macOS, and Linux, while Redwood is solely focused on web development, making it more limited in terms of platform support. This difference makes .NET Core a more versatile option for developers who need to build applications for various operating systems.
Language Support: Another significant difference is the language support provided by these frameworks. .NET Core supports a variety of languages such as C#, Visual Basic, and F#, while Redwood is primarily focused on JavaScript and TypeScript. This difference in language support can impact the developer's choice based on their preferred programming language and expertise.
Ecosystem and Community: .NET Core has a larger ecosystem and community compared to Redwood. This translates to a wider range of libraries, tools, and resources available for developers using .NET Core, making it easier to find solutions to problems and collaborate with other developers. Redwood, being a newer and more specialized framework, may have a smaller ecosystem, which could potentially limit the support available.
Performance: .NET Core is known for its performance optimization, making it a faster option for certain types of applications. Redwood, on the other hand, focuses more on developer experience and productivity, which may result in slightly lower performance compared to .NET Core for specific use cases. This difference in performance can be a crucial factor when choosing between the two frameworks for a particular project.

In Summary, the key differences between .NET Core and Redwood include platform compatibility, language support, ecosystem and community, and performance optimization.

.NET Core vs Redwood

Overview