Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Dropwizard vs Jersey: What are the differences?
Introduction:
This article will highlight the key differences between Dropwizard and Jersey, two popular frameworks used for building web applications. Dropwizard is a Java-based framework that combines multiple libraries, including Jersey, to simplify the development of RESTful web services. Jersey, on the other hand, is a full-featured, open-source framework specifically designed for building RESTful Web Services in Java.
Dropwizard architecture: Dropwizard follows a holistic approach to building web applications. It combines several pre-existing libraries, such as Jersey for RESTful web services, Jetty for HTTP server capabilities, Jackson for JSON processing, and more. Dropwizard provides a comprehensive and integrated development stack, making it easier for developers to work on various aspects of a web application simultaneously.
Jersey as a standalone framework: Jersey, as its name suggests, is primarily focused on providing a robust framework for developing RESTful web services. Unlike Dropwizard, it does not include additional libraries for aspects like web server or database connectivity out-of-the-box. Jersey can be used as a standalone framework, allowing developers the flexibility to choose the supporting libraries according to their requirements and preferences.
Configuration management: Dropwizard provides built-in configuration management capabilities, allowing developers to externalize configuration settings from the application code. Dropwizard uses YAML files for configuration, making it easy to change settings without modifying the code. This separation of configuration from code promotes better maintainability and allows for easier deployment across different environments.
Limited customization in Dropwizard: While Dropwizard provides a comprehensive development stack, it comes with limited customization options. Dropwizard follows a convention-over-configuration approach, making some decisions for the developers to streamline the development process. However, this can be limiting for projects requiring extensive customization or unique architectural choices.
Extensive customization in Jersey: Jersey, being a standalone framework, offers developers more flexibility and control over the customizations of their web services. Developers can choose the specific libraries and configurations they want to use with Jersey, allowing for a more tailored approach to building RESTful web services. This increased flexibility can be beneficial for projects with specific requirements or complex architectures.
Ease of getting started: Dropwizard provides a comprehensive, opinionated setup for building web applications, making it easier for developers to get started quickly. It simplifies the initial project setup by providing sensible defaults and integrates the required libraries seamlessly. In contrast, Jersey, being a standalone framework, requires developers to make choices and set up the necessary components manually. This may require additional effort and time to get started with a basic web application.
In summary, Dropwizard is an opinionated framework that combines multiple libraries to simplify the development of web applications, while Jersey is a standalone framework designed specifically for building RESTful web services. Dropwizard provides a holistic approach and built-in configuration management, but with limited customization options. Jersey offers extensive customization and flexibility, but requires more manual setup and decision-making.
Pros of Dropwizard
- Quick and easy to get a new http service going27
- Health monitoring23
- Metrics integration20
- Easy setup20
- Good conventions18
- Good documentation14
- Lightweight14
- Java Powered13
- Good Testing frameworks10
- Java powered, lightweight7
- Simple5
- Scalable4
- Great performance, Good in prod3
- Open source2
- All in one-productive-production ready-makes life easy2
Pros of Jersey
- Lightweight4
- Fast Performance With Microservices1
- Java standard1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Dropwizard
- Slightly more confusing dependencies2
- Not on ThoughtWorks radar since 20141