Get Advice Icon

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Dropwizard
Dropwizard

208
170
+ 1
162
Play
Play

566
312
+ 1
461
Add tool

Dropwizard vs Play: What are the differences?

Developers describe Dropwizard as "Java framework for developing ops-friendly, high-performance, RESTful web services". Dropwizard is a sneaky way of making fast Java web applications. Dropwizard pulls together stable, mature libraries from the Java ecosystem into a simple, light-weight package that lets you focus on getting things done. On the other hand, Play is detailed as "The High Velocity Web Framework For Java and Scala". Play Framework makes it easy to build web applications with Java & Scala. Play is based on a lightweight, stateless, web-friendly architecture. Built on Akka, Play provides predictable and minimal resource consumption (CPU, memory, threads) for highly-scalable applications.

Dropwizard and Play belong to "Frameworks (Full Stack)" category of the tech stack.

"Quick and easy to get a new http service going" is the top reason why over 23 developers like Dropwizard, while over 73 developers mention "Scala" as the leading cause for choosing Play.

Dropwizard and Play are both open source tools. Play with 11.2K GitHub stars and 3.77K forks on GitHub appears to be more popular than Dropwizard with 7.25K GitHub stars and 3.04K GitHub forks.

According to the StackShare community, Play has a broader approval, being mentioned in 112 company stacks & 47 developers stacks; compared to Dropwizard, which is listed in 51 company stacks and 12 developer stacks.

What is Dropwizard?

Dropwizard is a sneaky way of making fast Java web applications. Dropwizard pulls together stable, mature libraries from the Java ecosystem into a simple, light-weight package that lets you focus on getting things done.

What is Play?

Play Framework makes it easy to build web applications with Java & Scala. Play is based on a lightweight, stateless, web-friendly architecture. Built on Akka, Play provides predictable and minimal resource consumption (CPU, memory, threads) for highly-scalable applications.
Get Advice Icon

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Why do developers choose Dropwizard?
Why do developers choose Play?

Sign up to add, upvote and see more prosMake informed product decisions

What companies use Dropwizard?
What companies use Play?

Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

What tools integrate with Dropwizard?
What tools integrate with Play?
What are some alternatives to Dropwizard and Play?
Spring Boot
Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.
Spring
A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.
Dropwizard Metrics
It is a Java library which gives you insight into what your code does in production. It provides a powerful toolkit of ways to measure the behavior of critical components in your production environment. It provides you with full-stack visibility.
Node.js
Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.
ASP.NET
.NET is a developer platform made up of tools, programming languages, and libraries for building many different types of applications.
See all alternatives
Decisions about Dropwizard and Play
Alex A
Alex A
Founder at PRIZ Guru · | 3 upvotes · 124.9K views
atPRIZ GuruPRIZ Guru
Grails
Grails
Play
Play
Scala
Scala
Groovy
Groovy
Gradle
Gradle

Some may wonder why did we choose Grails ? Really good question :) We spent quite some time to evaluate what framework to go with and the battle was between Play Scala and Grails ( Groovy ). We have enough experience with both and, to be honest, I absolutely in love with Scala; however, the tipping point for us was the potential speed of development. Grails allows much faster development pace than Play , and as of right now this is the most important parameter. We might convert later though. Also, worth mentioning, by default Grails comes with Gradle as a build tool, so why change?

See more
Interest over time
Reviews of Dropwizard and Play
No reviews found
How developers use Dropwizard and Play
Avatar of datapile
datapile uses PlayPlay

Play is a central framework/component/library (not sure what to call things these days) in Scala. We <3 Scala, and therefore we <3 Play.

Play is on of several frameworks we are prototyping and vetting for various public-facing websites, and may ultimately be the framework behind the main datapile.io website.

Avatar of Stanislaus Madueke
Stanislaus Madueke uses PlayPlay

I used Play to build a configuration UI for the service, which let you create and manage the menus (a hierarchical tree of options and actions).

Avatar of Ascendify
Ascendify uses PlayPlay

Moving some micro services to Play Framework with Scala

Avatar of papaver
papaver uses PlayPlay

used play at talenthouse. uber powerful backend.

Avatar of Jovi Kao
Jovi Kao uses PlayPlay

API server framework

How much does Dropwizard cost?
How much does Play cost?
Pricing unavailable
Pricing unavailable
News about Dropwizard
More news
News about Play
More news