StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Build Automation
  4. Front End Package Manager
  5. Duo vs FortiAuthenticator

Duo vs FortiAuthenticator

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Duo
Duo
Stacks24
Followers43
Votes1
GitHub Stars3.4K
Forks115
FortiAuthenticator
FortiAuthenticator
Stacks4
Followers11
Votes0

Duo vs FortiAuthenticator: What are the differences?

Introduction

Duo and FortiAuthenticator are both authentication solutions that provide secure access to protected resources. However, they have key differences that distinguish them from each other.

  1. Deployment Model: Duo is a cloud-based solution that is hosted and managed by Duo Security, whereas FortiAuthenticator is an on-premises solution that is deployed and managed by the organization. This difference in deployment models allows organizations to choose the solution that best aligns with their infrastructure and security requirements.

  2. Integration Capabilities: Duo has a wide range of integrations with various applications and services, making it compatible with different systems and platforms. On the other hand, FortiAuthenticator is designed to integrate primarily with Fortinet's network security solutions, providing a seamless authentication experience within the Fortinet ecosystem. This difference in integration capabilities enables organizations to choose the solution that aligns with their existing technology stack.

  3. Authentication Methods: Duo offers a variety of authentication methods, including push notifications, SMS passcodes, phone callback, hardware tokens, and biometric authentication. FortiAuthenticator, on the other hand, supports a range of authentication methods such as one-time passwords (OTP), certificates, and smart cards. This difference in supported authentication methods allows organizations to choose the solution that aligns with their preferred user authentication mechanisms.

  4. User Experience: Duo provides a user-friendly experience with its intuitive interface and quick authentication methods like push notifications. It focuses on simplicity and ease of use for both end-users and administrators. In contrast, FortiAuthenticator offers more advanced features and customization options, making it suitable for organizations with complex authentication requirements. This difference in user experience allows organizations to choose the solution that best suits their user base and operational needs.

  5. Reporting and Analytics: Duo provides detailed reporting and analytics on user authentication data, helping organizations monitor and analyze security events and user behavior effectively. FortiAuthenticator also offers reporting capabilities, but it is more focused on providing network security information and analytics within the Fortinet ecosystem. This difference in reporting and analytics capabilities allows organizations to choose the solution that aligns with their specific reporting and compliance requirements.

  6. Licensing Model: Duo operates based on a subscription model, where organizations pay for the number of users they authenticate. FortiAuthenticator, on the other hand, is typically licensed as part of a broader Fortinet network security solution package. This difference in licensing models allows organizations to choose the solution that best fits their budgeting and procurement processes.

In summary, Duo and FortiAuthenticator differ in their deployment models, integration capabilities, supported authentication methods, user experience, reporting and analytics features, and licensing models. Organizations should evaluate these differences to select the authentication solution that aligns with their specific needs and requirements.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Duo
Duo
FortiAuthenticator
FortiAuthenticator

Duo is a next-generation package manager that blends the best ideas from Component, Browserify and Go to make organizing and writing front-end code quick and painless.

It provides services which are key in creating effective security policy, strengthening security by ensuring only the right person at the right time can access your sensitive networks and data.

has first-class support for Javascript, HTML and CSS;exposes a unix-y command line interface;pulls source directly from GitHub with semantic versioning;supports source transforms, like Coffeescript or Sass;does not require a manifest
Ability to transparently identify network users and enforce identity-driven policy on a Fortinet-enabled enterprise network; Seamless secure two-factor/OTP authentication across the organization in conjunction with FortiToken; Certificate management for enterprise wireless and VPN deployment; Guest management for wired and wireless network security; Single Sign On capabilities for both internal and cloud networks
Statistics
GitHub Stars
3.4K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
115
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
24
Stacks
4
Followers
43
Followers
11
Votes
1
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 1
    Lean and efficient
No community feedback yet

What are some alternatives to Duo, FortiAuthenticator?

npm

npm

npm is the command-line interface to the npm ecosystem. It is battle-tested, surprisingly flexible, and used by hundreds of thousands of JavaScript developers every day.

RequireJS

RequireJS

RequireJS loads plain JavaScript files as well as more defined modules. It is optimized for in-browser use, including in a Web Worker, but it can be used in other JavaScript environments, like Rhino and Node. It implements the Asynchronous Module API. Using a modular script loader like RequireJS will improve the speed and quality of your code.

Browserify

Browserify

Browserify lets you require('modules') in the browser by bundling up all of your dependencies.

Auth0

Auth0

A set of unified APIs and tools that instantly enables Single Sign On and user management to all your applications.

Yarn

Yarn

Yarn caches every package it downloads so it never needs to again. It also parallelizes operations to maximize resource utilization so install times are faster than ever.

Stormpath

Stormpath

Stormpath is an authentication and user management service that helps development teams quickly and securely build web and mobile applications and services.

Keycloak

Keycloak

It is an Open Source Identity and Access Management For Modern Applications and Services. It adds authentication to applications and secure services with minimum fuss. No need to deal with storing users or authenticating users. It's all available out of the box.

Devise

Devise

Devise is a flexible authentication solution for Rails based on Warden

Firebase Authentication

Firebase Authentication

It provides backend services, easy-to-use SDKs, and ready-made UI libraries to authenticate users to your app. It supports authentication using passwords, phone numbers, popular federated identity providers like Google,

Amazon Cognito

Amazon Cognito

You can create unique identities for your users through a number of public login providers (Amazon, Facebook, and Google) and also support unauthenticated guests. You can save app data locally on users’ devices allowing your applications to work even when the devices are offline.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp