StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Templating Languages & Extensions
  4. Templating Languages And Extensions
  5. Dust vs Mustache

Dust vs Mustache

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Mustache
Mustache
Stacks2.4K
Followers415
Votes50
GitHub Stars16.7K
Forks2.4K
Dust
Dust
Stacks11
Followers19
Votes0
GitHub Stars1.4K
Forks123

Dust vs Mustache: What are the differences?

  1. Syntax Flexibility: Dust allows for more intricate logic and functionality in its syntax, such as conditionals, partials, and blocks, making it more suitable for complex template tasks. Mustache, on the other hand, follows a strict and minimalistic syntax that emphasizes simplicity and ease of use.

  2. Template Inheritance: Dust offers template inheritance, which enables the reuse and extension of templates through a hierarchical structure. Mustache does not natively support template inheritance, requiring developers to implement workarounds for similar functionality.

  3. Escaping HTML: Dust by default escapes HTML content, promoting security by preventing cross-site scripting attacks. Mustache does not automatically escape HTML, putting the burden on developers to manually escape content, which can lead to potential security vulnerabilities.

  4. Partials and Blocks: Dust provides built-in support for partials and blocks, allowing for modular and reusable template components. Mustache lacks native support for partials and blocks, necessitating additional tools or custom implementations for similar behavior.

  5. Error Handling: Dust includes more robust error handling features, providing detailed error messages that aid in debugging and troubleshooting. Mustache's error handling is relatively basic, offering less detailed feedback in case of syntax or logic errors.

  6. Whitespace Control: Dust offers more control over whitespace handling, allowing developers to control how whitespace is handled within templates. Mustache has limited whitespace control options, which can sometimes lead to unexpected rendering issues.

In Summary, Dust offers more advanced features and flexibility compared to Mustache, making it a preferred choice for complex templating tasks.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Mustache
Mustache
Dust
Dust

Mustache is a logic-less template syntax. It can be used for HTML, config files, source code - anything. It works by expanding tags in a template using values provided in a hash or object. We call it "logic-less" because there are no if statements, else clauses, or for loops. Instead there are only tags. Some tags are replaced with a value, some nothing, and others a series of values.

Dust is a JavaScript templating engine designed to provide a clean separation between presentation and logic without sacrificing ease of use. It is particularly well-suited for asynchronous and streaming applications.

Statistics
GitHub Stars
16.7K
GitHub Stars
1.4K
GitHub Forks
2.4K
GitHub Forks
123
Stacks
2.4K
Stacks
11
Followers
415
Followers
19
Votes
50
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 29
    Dead simple templating
  • 12
    Open source
  • 8
    Small
  • 1
    Support in lots of languages
No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available
Node.js
Node.js

What are some alternatives to Mustache, Dust?

TypeScript

TypeScript

TypeScript is a language for application-scale JavaScript development. It's a typed superset of JavaScript that compiles to plain JavaScript.

Pug

Pug

This project was formerly known as "Jade." Pug is a high performance template engine heavily influenced by Haml and implemented with JavaScript for Node.js and browsers.

Handlebars.js

Handlebars.js

Handlebars.js is an extension to the Mustache templating language created by Chris Wanstrath. Handlebars.js and Mustache are both logicless templating languages that keep the view and the code separated like we all know they should be.

Slim Lang

Slim Lang

Slim is a template language whose goal is to reduce the view syntax to the essential parts without becoming cryptic. It started as an exercise to see how much could be removed from a standard html template (<, >, closing tags, etc...). As more people took an interest in Slim, the functionality grew and so did the flexibility of the syntax.

RactiveJS

RactiveJS

Ractive was originally created at theguardian.com to produce news applications. Ractive takes your Mustache templates and transforms them into a lightweight representation of the DOM – then when your data changes, it intelligently updates the real DOM.

EJS

EJS

It is a simple templating language that lets you generate HTML markup with plain JavaScript. No religiousness about how to organize things. No reinvention of iteration and control-flow. It's just plain JavaScript.

Jinja

Jinja

It is a full featured template engine for Python. It has full unicode support, an optional integrated sandboxed execution environment, widely used and BSD licensed.

Twig

Twig

It is a modern template engine for PHP. It is flexible, fast, and secure. Its syntax originates from Jinja and Django templates.

Nunjucks

Nunjucks

Rich Powerful language with block inheritance, autoescaping, macros, asynchronous control, and more. Heavily inspired by jinja2. It supports all modern browsers.

Hogan.js

Hogan.js

Hogan.js is a 3.4k JS templating engine developed at Twitter. Use it as a part of your asset packager to compile templates ahead of time or include it in your browser to handle dynamic templates.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase